The role of theory to develop and evaluate a toolkit to increase clinical measurement and interpretation of walking speed and distance in adults post-stroke

References

• Krueger H, Koot J, Hall RE, et al. Prevalence of individuals experiencing the effects of stroke in Canada: trends and projections. Stroke. 2015;46(8):2226–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):447–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global health estimates: disease burden and mortality estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016 [cited 2019 May 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/en/
   Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Salbach NM, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: rehabilitation, recovery, and community participation following stroke. Part one: rehabilitation and recovery following stroke, 6th edition update 2019. Int J Stroke. 2020;15(7):763–788.
   Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al.; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian clinical guidelines for stroke management: Stroke Foundation; 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 18]. Available from: https://strokefoundation.org.au/What-we-do/Treatment-programs/Clinical-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen EEH, van Peppen RPS, et al. KNGF clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with stroke; 2014 [cited 2020 Oct 27]. Available from: http://95.211.164.114/index.php/kngf-guidelines-in-english
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Horner RD, Reker DM, et al. Adherence to postacute rehabilitation guidelines is associated with functional recovery in stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(1):167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reker DM, Duncan PW, Horner BD, et al. Postacute stroke guideline compliance is associated with greater patient satisfaction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathoo C, Buren S, El-Haddad R, et al. Aerobic training in Canadians stroke rehabilitation programs. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(4):248–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon-Nair A, Korner-Bitensky N, Ogourtsova T. Occupational therapists' identification, assessment, and treatment of unilateral spatial neglect during stroke rehabilitation in Canada. Stroke. 2007;38(9):2556–2562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Desrosiers J. Actual vs best practice for families post-stroke according to three rehabilitation disciplines. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(7):513–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Guilcher SJ, Jaglal SB. Physical therapists' perceptions and use of standardized assessments of walking ability post-stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(6):543–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Wood-Dauphinee S, Desrosiers J, et al. Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salbach NM, Veinot P, Rappolt S, et al. Physical therapists' experiences updating the clinical management of walking rehabilitation after stroke: a qualitative study. Phys Ther. 2009;89(6):556–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane LJ, Olson CA, Murray S, et al. Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007;27(2):94–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research – Knowledge translation. 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 18]. Available from: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html
   Google Scholar
• Munce SEP, Graham ID, Salbach NM, et al. Perspectives of health care professionals on the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of a stroke rehabilitation guidelines cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennington L, Roddam H, Burton C, et al. Promoting research use in speech and language therapy: a cluster randomized controlled trial to compare the clinical effectiveness and costs of two training strategies. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzold A, Korner-Bitensky N, Salbach NM, et al. Increasing knowledge of best practices in occupational therapists treating post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: results of a knowledge-translation intervention study. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(2):118–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards CL, Malouin F, Nadeau S, et al. Development, implementation, and clinician adherence to a standardized assessment toolkit for sensorimotor rehabilitation after stroke. Physiother Can. 2019;71(1):43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Richards CL, et al. Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(19):1633–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada J, Shorkey A, Barwick M, et al. The effectiveness of toolkits as knowledge translation strategies for integrating evidence into clinical care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e006808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al.; Medical Research Council Guidance. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ. Clarity out of chaos: use of theory in implementation research. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strifler L, Cardoso R, McGowan J, et al. Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100:92–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley KM, Brooks D, Gardner P, et al. Development of a theory-based intervention to increase clinical measurement of reactive balance in adults at risk of falls. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40(2):100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, MacKay-Lyons M, Brooks D, et al. Effect of a toolkit on physical therapists' implementation of an evidence-informed approach to using the 10-metre and 6-minute walk tests post-stroke: a before-and-after study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;43(Suppl 1):I–II.
   Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field B, Booth A, Ilott I, et al. Using the Knowledge to Action Framework in practice: a citation analysis and systematic review. Implement Sci. 2014;9:172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, et al. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, et al. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley KM, Salbach NM. Applying knowledge translation theory to physical therapy research and practice in balance and gait assessment: case report. Phys Ther. 2015;95(4):579–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinkels RAHM, van Peppen RPS, Wittink H, et al. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the Netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):1–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salbach NM, Jaglal SB, Korner-Bitensky N, et al. Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87(10):1284–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Bacon K, Batty C, et al. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2003;83(9):786–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scurlock-Evans L, Upton P, Upton D. Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(3):208–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Oʼbrien KK, Brooks D, et al. Considerations for the selection of time-limited walk tests poststroke: a systematic review of test protocols and measurement properties. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017;41(1):3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng DK, Dagenais M, Alsbury K, et al. Distance-limited walk tests poststroke: a systematic review of protocols and measurement properties (under review). J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;41:3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, O'Brien K, Brooks D, et al. Speed and distance requirements for community ambulation: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(1):117–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, O'Brien KK, Brooks D, et al. Reference values for standardized tests of walking speed and distance: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2015;41(2):341–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall BJ, Gothe NP. Effect of aerobic exercise interventions on mobility among stroke patients: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(3):214–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French B, Thomas LH, Coupe J, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(11):CD006073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):459–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SS, Tsang WW, Cheung TH, et al. Walkway length, but not turning direction, determines the six-minute walk test distance in individuals with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(5):806–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SSM, Au KKC, Chan ELW, et al. Effect of acceleration and deceleration distance on the walking speed of people with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(8):666–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allet L, Leemann B, Guyen E, et al. Effect of different walking aids on walking capacity of patients with poststroke hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(8):1408–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Pugsley SO, Sullivan MJ, et al. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax. 1984;39(11):818–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Williams Andrews A. Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2011;97(3):182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill K, Wickerson LM, Woon LJ, et al. The 6-min walk test: responses in healthy Canadians aged 45 to 85 years. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36(5):643–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedestrian countdown signals: City of Toronto; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 18]. Available from: https://www.toronto.ca/services-payments/streets-parking-transportation/traffic-management/traffic-signals-street-signs/types-of-traffic-signals/pedestrian-countdown-timers/
   Google Scholar
• Canadian capacity guide for signalized intersections: Institute of Transportation Engineers, District 7 – Canada; 2008 [cited 2019 Dec 18]. Available from: http://www.tac-atc.ca/sites/tac-atc.ca/files/site/doc/resources/report-capacityguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56(1):27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Veinot P, Jaglal SB, et al. From continuing education to personal digital assistants: what do physical therapists need to support evidence-based practice in stroke management? J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(4):786–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison KM, Brooks D, Cameron JI, et al. Factors influencing physical therapists' use of standardized measures of walking capacity poststroke across the care continuum. Phys Ther. 2015;95(11):1507–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• iWalkAssess: the latest evidence-informed approach to walking assessment post-stroke. [cited 2020 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.iwalkassess.com/
   Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Solomon P, O'Brien KK, et al. Design features of a guideline implementation tool designed to increase awareness of a clinical practice guide to HIV rehabilitation: A qualitative process evaluation. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(4):648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, et al. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(4):20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(6):433–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback: effects of professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(6):CD000259..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysong SJ. Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care. 2009;47(3):356–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. 10 usability heuristics for user interface design. 1994 [cited 2020 19 October]. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
   Google Scholar
• iWalk educational video: administration of the 10-metre walk test and 6-minute walk test with a person post-stroke: YouTube; 2015 [updated 2020 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI_gERx5EmI&t=309s
   Google Scholar
• Virzi RA. Refining the test phase of usability evaluation – how many subjects is enough. Hum Factors. 1992;34(4):457–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, et al. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman J, Lannin N, Cook C, et al. Development and psychometric testing of the Clinician Readiness for Measuring Outcomes Scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(1):76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Urdan T, Pajares F, editors. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing; 2006. p. 307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sample size for McNemar test or paired changes in proportions program: StatsToDo; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 17]. Available from: http://www.statstodo.com/SSizMcNemar_Pgm.php
   Google Scholar
• Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, et al. Designing clinical research. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer – Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Guilcher SJT, Jaglal SB, et al. Determinants of research use in clinical decision making among physical therapists providing services post-stroke: a cross-sectional study. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng DK, Nelson M, Brooks D, et al. Validation of stroke-specific protocols for the 10-meter walk test and 6-minute walk test conducted using 15-meter and 30-meter walkways. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;21:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Callegaro M. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. London: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008 [cited 2019 Oct 29].
   Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014;39(5):356–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchholz A, Perry B, Weiss LB, et al. Smartphone use and perceptions among medical students and practicing physicians. J Mobile Tech Med. 2016;5(1):6.
   Google Scholar