When interactions are interruptions: an ethnographic study of information-sharing by speech and language therapists and nurses on stroke units

References

• Langhorne P, Ramachandra S, Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;(4):CD000197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudd AG, Bowen A, Young G, et al. National clinical guideline for stroke. 5th ed. Clinical medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016. Available from: https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/guidelines-policy/stroke-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Clarke DJ. Achieving teamwork in stroke units: the contribution of opportunistic dialogue. J Interprof Care. 2010; 24(3):285–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin S, Reeves S. Enacting 'team' and 'teamwork': using Goffman's theory of impression management to illuminate interprofessional practice on hospital wards. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(10):1595–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson SF, Burton L, McGovern A. Multi-disciplinary team meetings in stroke rehabilitation: an observation study and conceptual framework. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(12):1237–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton V, Hogden A, Long JC, et al. Clinicians perceptions of rounding processes and effectiveness of clinical communication. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26(3):801–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burm S, Boese K, Faden L, et al. Recognising the importance of informal communication events in improving collaborative care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(4):289–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard R, Jones J, Cruice M. Communication between therapists and nurses working in inpatient interprofessional teams: systematic review and meta-ethnography. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(10):1339–1349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke DJ. Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-ethnography. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(9–10):1201–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor J. A nursing perspective on the relationship between nursing and allied health in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(4):314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digby R, Bolster D, Perta A, et al. The perspective of allied health staff on the role of nurses in subacute care. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(21–22):4089–4099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller K, Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, et al. Nursing emotion work and interprofessional collaboration in general internal medicine wards: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2008;64(4):332–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg LM, Kallberg A, Ehrenberg A, et al. Factors influencing clinicians' perceptions of interruptions as disturbing or non-disturbing: a qualitative study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2016;27:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson SG, Wiegand DL. The culture contributing to interruptions in the nursing work environment: an ethnography. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23–24):5093–5102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGillis Hall L, Ferguson-Pare M, Peter E, et al. Going blank: factors contributing to interruptions to nurses' work and related outcomes. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18(8):1040–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. Australia: Stroke Foundation; 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 17]. Available from: https://informme.org.au/en/Guidelines/Clinical-Guidelines-for-Stroke-Management
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell C, Gittins M, Tyson  , et al. Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge. Aphasiology. 2020. DOI:10.1111/jep.13248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36(12):2756–2763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound C, Jensen LR. Humanising communication between nursing staff and patients with aphasia: Potential contributions of the humanisation values framework. Aphasiology. 2018;32(10):1225–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines S, Kynoch K, Munday J. Nursing interventions for identifying and managing acute dysphagia are effective for improving patient outcomes: a systematic review update. J Neurosci Nurs. 2016;48(4):214–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny T, Barr C, Laver K. Management of fever, hyperglycaemia, and dysphagia in an acute stroke unit. Rehabil Nurs. 2016;41:313–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe ST. Use of modified diets to prevent aspiration in oropharyngeal dysphagia: is current practice justified? BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter E, Liaschenko J. Perils of proximity: a spatiotemporal analysis of moral distress and moral ambiguity. Nurs Inq. 2004;11(4):218–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laustsen S, Brahe L. Coping with interruptions in clinical nursing – a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(7–8):1497–1506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight LK, Stetson PD, Bakken S. Perceived information needs and communication difficulties of inpatient physicians and nurses. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;9:64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long AF, Kneafsey R, Ryan J, et al. The role of the nurse within the multi-professional rehabilitation team. J Adv Nurs. 2002;37(1):70–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller K, Kontos PC. The intraprofessional and interprofessional relations of neurorehabilitation nurses: a negotiated order perspective. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(8):1797–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneviratne CC, Mather CM, Then KL. Understanding nursing on an acute stroke unit: perceptions of space, time and interprofessional practice. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(9):1872–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. Oxon; New York: Routledge; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rock P. Symbolic interactionism and ethnography. In Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, et al., editors. Handbook of ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2001. p. 26–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley M. What is ethnography? Can it survive? Should it? Ethnog Educ. 2018;13(1):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford J, Marcus G. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk A, Lelliott P, Seale C. The permeable institution: an ethnographic study of three acute psychiatric wards in London. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(8):2105–2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapley T. Interviews. In: Seale C, editor. Qualitative research practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004. p. 16–34.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures. New York (NY): Basic Books; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago (IL): Aldine; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Nvivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 11; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K, Mitchell RG. Grounded theory in ethnography. In Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, et al., editors. Handbook of ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2001. p. 160–174.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretative description. London (UK): Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln Y. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1993;16(2):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty M. The foundations of social research. London (UK): Sage; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor M. The ethnography of health and medicine. In Atkinson P, Coffey A, Delamont S, et al., editors. Handbook of ethnography. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2001. p. 177–187.
   Google Scholar
• Hall PM. Interactionism, social organization, and social processes: looking back and moving ahead. Symbolic Interactionism. 2003;26(1):33–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard R. Speech and language therapist and nurse information sharing: an ethnographic study on stroke units [dissertation]. London (UK): University of London; 2020. Available from: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/24392/
   Google Scholar
• Eldh AC, Arestedt L, Bertero C. Quotations in qualitative studies: reflections on constituents, custom and purpose. Int J Qual Methods. 2020. DOI:10.1177/1609406920969268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charon J. Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration. 10th ed. Boston (MA): Prentice Hall; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Allen D. Re-conceptualising holism in the contemporary nursing mandate: from individual to organisational relationships. Soc Sci Med. 2014;119:131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mind MG. Self and society. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Foster A, Worrall L, Rose M, et al. 'That doesn't translate': the role of evidence-based practice in disempowering speech pathologists in acute aphasia management. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015;50(4):547–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster A, O’Halloran R, Rose ML, et al. Communication is taking a back seat”: speech pathologists’ perceptions of aphasia management in acute hospital settings. Aphasiology. 2016;30(5):585–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Ferguson A, Power E, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: current practices, challenges and future directions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014;16(2):169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher M, Steel G, O’Halloran R, et al. Aphasia disrupts usual care: the stroke team’s perceptions of delivering healthcare to patients with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;11:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Clancy L, Povey R, Rodham K. “Living in a foreign country”: experiences of staff-patient communication in inpatient stroke settings for people with post-stroke aphasia and those supporting them. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;27(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson MB, Carlsson M, Sonnander K. Communication difficulties and the use of communication strategies: from the perspective of individuals with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012;47(2):144–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft MI, Martinsen B, Esbensen BA, et al. Call for human contact and support: an interview study exploring patients' experiences with inpatient stroke rehabilitation and their perception of nurses' and nurse assistants' roles and functions. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(4):396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loft MI, Poulsen I, Esbensen BA, et al. Nurses' and nurse assistants' beliefs, attitudes and actions related to role and function in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit – a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23–24):4905–4914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar