Exploring patient perspectives of barriers and facilitators to participating in hospital-based stroke rehabilitation

References

• Belagaje SR. Stroke Rehabilitation. Contin Lifelong Learn Neurol. 2017;23(1):238–253.
   Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Foley N, Hussein N, et al. Chapter 5: the efficacy of stroke rehabilitation. In: Evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation. 2018. www.ebrsr.com
   Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, et al. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ. 2000;321(7268):1051–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T, et al. Significance of poor patient participation in physical and occupational therapy for functional outcome and length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(10):1599–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Di Vita A, Massicci R, et al. Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48(3):455–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore ER, Whyte EM, Holm MB, et al. Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after Sstroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):203–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-Y, Kong KH. Level and predictors of participation in patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation. smedj. 2013;54(10):564–568.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilachis de Gialdino I. Ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2009;30(2):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald AG, Kayes MN, Bright F. Barriers and facilitators to engagement in rehabilitation for people with stroke: A review of the literature. New Zeal J Physiother. 2013;41(3):112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Alanko T, Karhula M, Kröger T, et al. Rehabilitees perspective on goal setting in rehabilitation – a phenomenological approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(19):2280–2288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Askim T, Balandin S, et al. Experiences of participation in goal setting for people with stroke-induced aphasia in Norway. A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(11):1122–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prout EC, Mansfield A, McIlroy WE, et al. Patients' perspectives on aerobic exercise early after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(7):684–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett L, Luker J, English C, et al. Stroke survivors' perspectives on two novel models of inpatient rehabilitation: seven-day a week individual therapy or five-day a week circuit class therapy. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(14):1397–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak P, Jawed H, Tirone C, et al. Incorporating research technology into the clinical assessment of balance and mobility: Perspectives of physiotherapists and people with stroke. Physiother Can. 2015;67(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl P, Gunnel C, Bunketorp Käll L, et al. Experiences from a multimodal rhythm and music-based rehabilitation program in late phase of stroke recovery - A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0204215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Bartley E, Janssen H, et al. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron J, Bastawrous M, Marsella A, et al. Stroke survivors', caregivers', and health care professionals' perspectives on the weekend pass to facilitate transition home. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(9):858–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White J, Janssen H, Jordan L, et al. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor's perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(13):1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady M, Jamieson K, Bugge C, et al. Caring for continence in stroke care settings: a qualitative study of patients' and staff perspectives on the implementation of a new continence care intervention. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(5):481–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin R, Stokes E, Cusack T. Family-mediated exercises (FAME): An exploration of participant's involvement in a novel form of exercise delivery after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(1):63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Field P-A. Nursing research: the application of qualitative approaches. Cheltenham (UK); Springer Nature; 1996. p. 208.
   Google Scholar
• Mason J. Qualitative researching. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 1996. p. 192.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive Description. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Kirkham SR, O'Flynn-Magee K. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(1):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hall RE, French E, Khan F, et al. Ontario Stroke Evaluation Report 2016: A Focus on Stroke Rehabilitation. Toronto (Ontario); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(19):CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• Sahely A. How do therapists understand and intend to implement practice guideline recommendations for rehabilitation of the uppper limb following stroke? [Master’s thesis]. McMaster University, Ontario, Canada; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description. 2nd ed. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press Inc; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Porock D, Li J. Resident outcomes of person-centered care in long-term care: a narrative review of interventional research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(10):1395–1415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Vol. 28, Sapporo Med J. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Medical Association. Patient-centred care. Ontario Medical Review. Toronto (Canada): Ontario Medical Association; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• The American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Person-Centered Care. Person-centered care: a definition and essential elements. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(1):15–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart M, Belle Brown J, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Family Practice. 2000;49:796–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechel DL, Myers WA, Smith DG. Does patient-centered care pay off? J Qual Improv. 2000;26(7):400–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picker Institute. Influence, Inspire, Empower: Impact report 2018–2019. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gerteis M. Through the patient’s eyes: Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Harper M, Cole P. Member checking: can benefits be gained similar to group therapy? Qual Rep. 2012;17:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba GE. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar