German version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-GE): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability

References

• Stevens RD, Marshall SA, Cornblath DR, et al. A framework for diagnosing and classifying intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10 Suppl.):S299–S308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. 2002;288(22):2859–2867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schefold JC, Bierbrauer J, Weber-Carstens S. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW) and muscle wasting in critically ill patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010;1(2):147–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson CL, Tipping CJ. Physiotherapy management of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. J Physiother. 2017;63(1):4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan E, Dowdy DW, Colantuoni E, et al. Physical complications in acute lung injury survivors: a two-year longitudinal prospective study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(4):849–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggmann S, Luder G, Verra ML, et al. Functional ability and quality of life in critical illness survivors with intensive care unit acquired weakness: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. PLOS One. 2020;15(3):e0229725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Hu W, Cai Z, et al. Early mobilization of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipping CJ, Harrold M, Holland A, et al. The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(2):171–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner EJ, Wood H, Englebretsen C, et al. The Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study. Physiotherapy. 2013;99(1):33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner EJ, Soni N, Handy JM, et al. Construct validity of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool: an observational study of recovery from critical illness. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Seguel F, Corner EJ, Merino-Osorio C. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health domains of 60 physical functioning measurement instruments used during the adult intensive care unit stay: a scoping review. Phys Ther. 2019;99(5):627–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry SM, Granger CL, Berney S, et al. Assessment of impairment and activity limitations in the critically ill: a systematic review of measurement instruments and their clinimetric properties. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(5):744–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans G, Clerckx B, Vanhullebusch T, et al. Interobserver agreement of Medical Research Council sum-score and handgrip strength in the intensive care unit. Muscle Nerve. 2012;45(1):18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson C, Needham D, Haines K, et al. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung. 2014;43(1):19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipping CJ, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R, et al. The ICU Mobility Scale has construct and predictive validity and is responsive. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(6):887–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts DG, de Keizer NF, Vroom MB, et al. Reliability and accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(9):1988–1993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, et al. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, et al. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(10):1338–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, et al. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn M. Sample size calculators. Clinical & Translational Science Institute UCSF; 2017 [cited 2017 Jan 5]. Available from: http://www.sample-size.net/correlation-sample-size/
   Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle W. psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University; 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych. Version = 2.0.12
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. J R Stat Soc Ser D (the Statistician). 1983;32(3):307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsen E, Dahan A, Borsboom G, et al. Improvements in the application and reporting of advanced Bland–Altman methods of comparison. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015;29(1):127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1033–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner EJ, Hichens LV, Attrill KM, et al. The responsiveness of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: an observational study. Burns. 2015;41(2):241–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdar U, Eriksson F, Siesage K, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the Swedish version of the Chelsea critical care assessment tool (CPAX-Swe) in critically ill patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Astrup K, Corner EJ, Hansen MG, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool into Danish. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;36(9):1027–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner EJ, Handy JM, Brett SJ. eLearning to facilitate the education and implementation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment: a novel measure of function in critical illness. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger D, Bloechlinger S, von Haehling S, et al. Dysfunction of respiratory muscles in critically ill patients on the intensive care unit. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(4):403–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteveen E, Wieske L, van der Poll T, et al. Increased early systemic inflammation in ICU-acquired weakness: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(6):972–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrush A, Rozek M, Dekerlegand JL. The clinical utility of the functional status score for the intensive care unit (FSS-ICU) at a long-term acute care hospital: a prospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2012;92(12):1536–1545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denehy L, de Morton NA, Skinner EH, et al. A physical function test for use in the intensive care unit: validity, responsiveness, and predictive utility of the physical function ICU test (scored). Phys Ther. 2013;93(12):1636–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggmann S, Verra ML, Luder G, et al. Effects of early, combined endurance and resistance training in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0207428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar