Governing neurorehabilitation

References

• Wade D. Rehabilitation–a new approach. Overview and part one: the problems. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2015;29(11):1041–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson K, Gibson BE, Leplège A. Rethinking rehabilitation: theory, practice, history? And the future. Rethinking rehabilitation. rehabilitation science in practice series. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Leplege A, Gzil F, Cammelli M, et al. Person-centredness: conceptual and historical perspectives. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2007;29(20–21):1555–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE. Rehabilitation: a post-critical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, Ward T, Levack WMM, et al. A good lives model of clinical and community rehabilitation. Disabil Rehab. 2007;29(20–21):1604–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley V, Peters S, Swarbrick C, et al. What factors affect clinical decision-making about access to stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. Clin Rehab. 2019;33(2):304–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch EA, Luker JA, Cadilhac DA, et al. Inequities in access to rehabilitation: exploring how acute stroke unit clinicians decide who to refer to rehabilitation. Disab Rehab. 2016;38(14):1415–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch EA, Cadilhac DA, Luker JA, et al. Inequities in access to inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: an international scoping review. Topic Stroke Rehab . 2017;24(8):619–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part two: the underlying theories. Clin Rehab. 2015;29(12):1145–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part three: the implications of the theories. Clin Rehab. 2016;30(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor J, O'Connell B. Incongruence between nurses' and patients' understandings and expectations of rehabilitation. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(12):1766–1774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Boland P, Rutherford SJ, et al. Implementing a client-centred approach in rehabilitation: an autoethnography. Disabil Rehab. 2012;34(12):997–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupinski J, Seccades J, Shiraliyeva R. Towards effective neurorehabilitation for stroke patients. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;2:2–183
   Google Scholar
• van Hal L, Meershoek A, Nijhuis F, et al. A sociological perspective on "the unmotivated client": public accountability and professional work methods in vocational rehabilitation. Disabil Rehab. 2013;35(10):809–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönberger M, Humle F, Teasdale TW. Subjective outcome of brain injury rehabilitation in relation to the therapeutic working alliance, client compliance and awareness. Brain Inj. 2006;20(12):1271–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans CC, Sherer M, Nakase-Richardson R, et al. Evaulation of an interdisciplinary team intervention to improve therapeutic alliance in post-acute brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2008;23(5):329–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek J. At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(8):1140–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey N. Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis revisited. Psychol Women Quart. 2011;35(1):183–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AY, Mazzei LA. Plugging one text into another: thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2013;19(4):261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheek J. Postmodern and poststructural approaches to nursing research. Thousand Oaks C.A.: Sage; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Willig C. Discourse analysis and health psychology. In: Murray M, editor. Critical health psychology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004. p. 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Hall S. Foucault; power knowledge and discourse. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ, editors. Discourse Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2001. p. 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The subject and power. In: Dreyfus H, Rabinow P, editors. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1983. p. 208–226.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge. Oxon: Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall G, Wickham G. Using Foucault's Methods. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mills S. Michel Foucault. Eaglestone R, editor. London: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Society must be defended: lectures at the College de France 1975–76. In: Macey D, translator, Bertani M, Fontana A, editors.New York: Picador; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Technologies of the self. In: Luther HM, Huck G, Patrick HH, editors. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press; 1988. p. 16–49.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Waring J, Latif A. Of shepherds, sheep and sheepdogs? Governing the adherent self through complementary and competing ‘pastorates’. Sociology. 2018;52(5):1069–1086.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hook D. Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. Theory Psychol. 2001;11(4):521–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manias E, Street A. Possibilities for critical social theory and Foucault's work: a toolbox approach. Nurs Inquiry. 2000;7(1):50–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fadyl JK, Nicholls DA, McPherson KM. Interrogating discourse: the application of Foucault's methodological discussion to specific inquiry. Health. 2013;17(5):478–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills S. Discourse. London: Routledge; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description. Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton J. Secondary analysis of qualitative data: an overview. Historische Sozialforschung[Histor Social Res]. 2008;33(3):33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Berger R. Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qual Res. 2015;15(2):219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counties Manukau District Health Board. Adult rehabilitation services (Neurological); 2014. [accessed 2015 Feb 8]. Available from: http://www.healthpoint.co.nz/public/neurology/counties-manukau-health-adult-rehabilitation-1/.
   Google Scholar
• Rose NC. 2: Politics and life. The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2006. p. 41–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della FM, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Human technologies in rehabilitation: 'who' and 'how' we are with our clients. Disabil Rehab. 2012;34(22):1907–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part four: a new paradigm, and its implications. Clin Rehab. 2016;30(2):109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes C. Pastoral power and the confessing subject in patient-centred communication. Bioeth Inq. 2009;6(4):483–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The will to knowledge: the history of sexuality. Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Foth T, Holmes D. Neoliberalism and the government of nursing through competency-based education. Nurs Inq. 2017;24(2):e12154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring J, Martin G. Network leadership as pastoral power: the governance of quality improvement communities in the English National Health Service. In: Bevir M, editor. Governmentality after Neoliberalism. London: Routledge;  2018. p. 135–151.
   Google Scholar
• Perron A, Fluet C, Holmes D. Agents of care and agents of the state: bio-power and nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(5):536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar