Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Danish version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function

References

• Feigin VL, Krishnamurthi RV, Parmar P, et al. Update on the global burden of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in 1990–2013: the GBD 2013 study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):161–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet (London, England). 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendis S. Stroke disability and rehabilitation of stroke: World Health Organization perspective. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(1):3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(4):CD001920.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Neurology Section Task Force. Phys Ther. 2013;93(10):1383–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan Z, Liu H, Yan T, et al. The effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation based on a normal gait pattern on subjects with early stroke: a randomized controlled trial. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson HC, Opheim A, Lundgren-Nilsson A, et al. Upper extremity recovery after ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke: part of the SALGOT study. Eur Stroke J. 2016;1(4):310–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer VS, Freburger JK, Yin Z, et al. Recovery of paretic lower extremity loading ability and physical function in the first six months after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(8):1547–1555.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santisteban L, Teremetz M, Bleton JP, et al. Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, et al. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(3):110–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63(10):1606–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Lannin NA, Borschmann K, et al. Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(9):784–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster C, Hahn S, Ettlin T. Objectively-assessed outcome measures: a translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure applied to the Chedoke McMaster Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbosa NE, Forero SM, Galeano CP, et al. Translation and cultural validation of clinical observational scales – the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in Colombian Spanish. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(19):2317–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchi F, Carrabba C, Bertolucci F, et al. Transcultural translation and validation of Fugl-Meyer assessment to Italian. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11–12):565–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E. Different ranking approaches defining association and agreement measures of paired ordinal data. Stat Med. 2012;31(26):3104–3117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin AE. Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: the ABCs of reliability. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977;10(1):141–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson E, Holm S. Separation of systematic and random differences in ordinal rating scales. Stat Med. 1994;13(23–24):2437–2453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandinavian Stroke Study Group. Multicenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke – background and study protocol. Stroke. 1985;16(5):885–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández ED, Galeano CP, Barbosa NE, et al. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of Fugl-Meyer assessment of upper extremity in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(9):652–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaziani E, Couppé C, Siersma V, et al. Electrical somatosensory stimulation in early rehabilitation of arm paresis after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(10):899–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EE, et al. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: the EXPLICIT-Stroke Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(9):804–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter KL, Teasell RW, Foley NC, et al. Outcome assessment in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(12):1007–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogataj U, Gros N, Kljajic M, et al. Enhanced rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a case report of a therapeutic approach using multichannel functional electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1997;5(2):221–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lundquist CB, Maribo T. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(9):934–939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, et al. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15(1):80–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar