Qualitative evaluation of a support group for women with children with Zika congenital syndrome in Southern Colombia

References

• Pacheco O, Beltrán M, Nelson CA, et al. Zika virus disease in Colombia – preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):e44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas EL, Tong VT, Rozo N, et al. Preliminary report of microcephaly potentially associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy – Colombia, January–November 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(49):1409–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):288–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler AC. Development of Infants With Congenital Zika syndrome: what do we know and what can we expect? Pediatrics. 2018;141(Suppl 2):S154–S60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuper H, Smythe T, Duttine A. Reflections on health promotion and disability in low and middle-income countries: case study of parent-support programmes for children with congenital Zika syndrome. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viens LJ, Fleck-Derderian S, Baez-Santiago MA, et al. Role of prenatal ultrasonography and amniocentesis in the diagnosis of congenital Zika syndrome: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):1185–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos Oliveira SJG, Dos Reis CL, Cipolotti R, et al. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in mothers of newborns with microcephaly and presumed congenital Zika virus infection: a follow-up study during the first year after birth. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017;20(3):473–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire IM, Pone SM, Ribeiro MDC, et al. Congenital Zika virus syndrome in infants: repercussions for the promotion of families' mental health. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34(9):e00176217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas PSS, Soares GB, Mocelin HJS, et al. How do mothers feel? Life with children with congenital Zika syndrome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;148(S2):20–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza WV, Albuquerque MFPM, Vazquez E, et al. Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuper H, Lopes Moreira ME, Barreto de Araújo TV, et al. The association of depression, anxiety, and stress with caring for a child with congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil; results of a cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(9):e0007768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carla da Silva Reis M, Araújo Carvalho AC, Souza Tavares CS, et al. Changes in occupational roles and common mental disorders in mothers of children with congenital Zika syndrome. Am J Occup Ther. 2020;74(1):7401345010p1–7401345010p5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams NA, Villachan-Lyra P, Marvin C, et al. Anxiety and depression among caregivers of young children with congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(15):2100–2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos TNC, Schiariti V, Gladstone M, et al. How congenital Zika virus impacted my child's functioning and disability: a Brazilian qualitative study guided by the ICF. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e038228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laza C, Rodríguez ME, Lasso J, et al. Experience of women with prenatal Zika virus infection who continued gestation in Colombia. Gac Sanit. 2020. DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.02.014.
   Google Scholar
• Kuper H, Lyra TM, Moreira MEL, et al. Social and economic impacts of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: study protocol and rationale for a mixed-methods study. Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smythe T, Duttine A, Vieira ACD, et al. Engagement of fathers in parent group interventions for children with congenital zika syndrome: a qualitative study. IJERPH. 2019;16(20):3862.
   Google Scholar
• Cole L, Kharwa Y, Khumalo N, et al. Caregivers of school-aged children with autism: social media as a source of support. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(12):3464–3475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuurmond M, Nyante G, Baltussen M, et al. A support programme for caregivers of children with disabilities in Ghana: understanding the impact on the wellbeing of caregivers. Child Care Health Dev. 2019;45(1):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin MAF, Ribeiro AF, Lee LC, et al. Social-emotional support group for parents of children and adolescents with Williams Syndrome. Cad Pós-Grad Distúrb Desenvolv. 2016;16:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bray L, Carter B, Sanders C, et al. Parent-to-parent peer support for parents of children with a disability: A mixed method study. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(8):1537–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piersol CV, Canton K, Connor SE, et al. Effectiveness of interventions for caregivers of people with Alzheimer's disease and related major neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71(5):7105180020p1–710518002p10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam AE, de Vugt ME, Klinkenberg IP, et al. A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: are they doing what they promise? Maturitas. 2016;85:117–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson C, Dow J, Gibson G, et al. Psychosocial intervention for carers of people with dementia: What components are most effective and when? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(1):31–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch H. Focused ethnography. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2005;6(3):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid M, Caine V, Goez H. The encounters and challenges of ethnography as a methodology in health research. Int J Qual Methods. 2015;14(5):160940691562142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz EV, Higginbottom G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research. Nurse Res. 2013;20(4):36–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, et al. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(6):843–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger R, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. London: Sage Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solli H, Bjørk IT, Hvalvik S, et al. Like an extended family: relationships that emerge when older caregivers use written messages to communicate in an ICT-based healthcare service. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018;43(2):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Roffeei SH, Abdullah N, Basar SKR. Seeking social support on Facebook for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(5):375–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez HM, Mejia C, Ocampo JA. A qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant women in accessing healthcare services during the Zika virus epidemic in Villavicencio, Colombia, 2015–2016. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;148(S2):29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muskat B, Salter R, Shindler S, et al. Here you feel like it's not taboo”: an evaluation of a pediatric hospital-based HIV support group. J HIV/AIDS Soc Serv. 2016;15(4):353–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipolletta S, Votadoro R, Faccio E. Online support for transgender people: an analysis of forums and social networks. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(5):1542–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipolletta S, Simonato C, Faccio E. The effectiveness of psychoeducational support groups for women with breast cancer and their caregivers: a mixed methods study. Front Psychol. 2019;10:288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey DB, Ventura LO. The likely impact of congenital Zika syndrome on families: considerations for family supports and services. Pediatrics. 2018;141(Suppl 2):S180–S7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cipolletta S, Gammino GR, Francescon P, et al. Mutual support groups for family caregivers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Italy: a pilot study. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(4):556–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg K, Sartore G, Cann W, et al. Barriers and promoters of participation in facilitated peer support groups for carers of children with special needs. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(4):775–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis K. Reclaiming women’s bodies: colonialist trope or critical epistemology? Sociol Rev. 2007;55(1_suppl):50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kruks S. Gender and subjectivity: Simone de Beauvoir and contemporary feminism. Signs. 1992;18(1):89–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Direct Prog Eval. 1986;1986(30):73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(9):1212–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cypress BS. Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: perspectives, strategies, reconceptualization, and recommendations. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36(4):253–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar