“I used to call him a non-decision-maker - I never do that anymore”: parental reflections about training to support decision-making of their adult offspring with intellectual disabilities

References

• Article 12: Equal recognition before the law 2014 [Internet]. Geneva (Switzerland): United Nations Human Rights. Committee on the rights of persons with disabilities; 2014 [cited 2021 Feb 17]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/crpd/pages/gc.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake A. Restoring voice to people with cognitive disabilities: realizing the right to equal recognition before the law. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bach M, Kerzner LA. New paradigm for protecting autonomy and the right to legal capacity. Ontario (Canada): Law Commission of Ontario; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Then S-N, Carney T, Bigby C, et al. Supporting decision-making of adults with cognitive disabilities: the role of law reform agencies - recommendations, rationales and influence. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018;64:64–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn NA, Blumenthal JA, Campbell AT. Supported decision-making: a viable alternative to guardianship? Penn State Law Rev. 2014;117(4):1111–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Browning MJ. Developing an understanding of supported decision-making practice in Canada: the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities and their supporters [dissertation]. Melbourne (Australia): La Trobe University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Arstein-Kerslake A, Watson J, Browning M, et al. Future directions in supported decision-making. Disabil Stud Q. 2017;37(1).
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Douglas J, Carney T, et al. Delivering decision-making support to people with cognitive disability — what has been learned from pilot programs in Australia from 2010 to 2015. Aust J Soc Issues. 2017;52(3):222–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning M, Bigby C, Douglas J. A process of decision-making support: exploring supported decision-making practice in Canada. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020;46(2):138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Douglas J, Smith E, et al. Parental strategies that support adults with intellectual disabilities to explore decision preferences, constraints and consequences. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2021. DOI:10.3109/13668250.2021.1954481.
   Google Scholar
• Curryer B, Stancliffe RJ, Dew A. Self-determination: adults with intellectual disability and their family. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;40(4):394–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curryer B, Stancliffe RJ, Wiese MY, et al. The experience of mothers supporting self-determination of adult sons and daughters with intellectual disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020;33(3):373–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor WD, Cobigo V, Ouellette-Kuntz H. A family systems perspective on supporting self-determination in young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019;32(5):1116–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney T. Supported decision-making in Australia: meeting the challenge of moving from capacity to capacity-building? Law Context. 2017;35(2):44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. National disability insurance scheme act 2013. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Cukalevski E. Supporting choice and control—an analysis of the approach taken to legal capacity in australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme. Laws. 2019;8(2):8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C. Dedifferentiation and people with intellectual disabilities in the australian national disability insurance scheme: bringing research, politics and policy together. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020;45(4):309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tune D. Review of the national disability insurance scheme act 2013. Removing red tape and implementing the NDIS participant service guarantee. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bigby C. Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision-making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(3):434–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Douglas J. Supported decision-making. In: Stancliffe R, Wehmeyer P, Shrogran K, editors. Choice, preference, and disability: promoting self-determination across the lifespan. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Springer; 2020. p. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Douglas J. Examining the complexities of support for decision-making practice. In: Khemka I, Hickson L, editors. Decision-making by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: research and practice. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Springer; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant A, Charmaz K. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• The La Trobe Support for Decision-making Practice Framework. An online learning resource [Internet]. Melbourne (Australia): La Trobe University; 2018 [cited 2021 Feb 17]. Available from: www.supportfordecisionmakingresource.com.au
   Google Scholar
• King N. Template analysis. In: Symon G, Cassel C, editors. Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: a practical guide. London (UK): SAGE; 1998. p. 118–134.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Strategies of qualitative inquiry. 2nd ed. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE; 2003. p. 249–291.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Whiteside M, Douglas J. Supporting decision-making of adults with intellectual disabilities: perspectives of family members and workers in disability support services. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019;44(4):396–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney T, Bigby C, Then S-N, et al. Paternalism to empowerment: all in the eye of the beholder? Disabil Soc. 2021. DOI:10.1080/09687599.2021.1941781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I, Bigby C, Carney T, et al. The temporalities of supported decision-making by people with cognitive disability. Soc Cult Geogr. 2020. DOI:10.1080/14649365.2020.1829689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineur T, Tideman M, Mallander O. Self-advocacy in Sweden-an analysis of impact on daily life and identity of self-advocates with intellectual disability. Cogent Soc Sci. 2017;3(1)
   Google Scholar
• Anything is possible when your choice matters [Internet]. New South Wales (Australia): Council For Intellectual Disability; 2018. Available from: https://cid.org.au/our-stories/anything-is-possible-when-your-choice-matters/
   Google Scholar
• Burke KM, Shogren KA, Raley SK, et al. Implementing evidence-based practices to promote self-determination: lessons learned from a state-wide implementation of the self-determined learning model of instruction. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2019;54(1):18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien CL, O’Brien J. The origins of person centred planning: a community of practice perspective. In: O’Brien J, O’Brien CL, editors. Implementing person-centered planning: voices of experience. Toronto (Canada): Inclusion Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar