Using the interviewer-administered version of Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) in Russia: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties in traumatic spinal cord injury

References

• Ivanova GE, Krylov VV, Cykunov MB, et al., editors. Reabilitaciya bol'nyh s travmaticheskoj bolezn'yu spinnogo mozga [Rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury]. Moscow: Moskovskie uchebniki i Kartolitografiya; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kosichkin MM, Grishina LP, Shapiro DM. Invalidnost' vsledstvie travmaticheskogo porazheniya spinnogo mozga, mediko-social'naya ekspertiza i reabilitaciya [Disability caused by traumatic spinal cord injury, medical and social evaluation and rehabilitation]. Med Soc Eval Rehabil. 1999;1:9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology of traumatic and nontraumatic spinal cord injury. In: Fehlings MG, editor. Critical care in spinal cord injury. London (UK): Future Medicine Ltd; 2013; p. 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ahuja C, Wilson J, Nori S, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontyev MA, Ovchinnikov OD. Izuchenie pokazanij k vosstanovleniyu lokomotornyh funkcij u pacientov s TBSM i prepyatstvuyushchih lokomocii faktorov [The study of the indications for recovery of locomotor functions in patients with TSCI and factors impeding locomotion]. Bull Kuzb Sci Cen. 2005;1:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Simonova IA, Kondakov EN. Kliniko-statisticheskaya harakteristika pozvonochno-spinnomozgovoj travmy [Clinical and statistical characteristics of spine and spinal cord injury]. Proceedings of the III Congress of Neurosurgeons of Russia; 2001 June 4–8; Saint Petersburg; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law N 197-FZ dated of 30.12.2001 (revised 16.12.2019). “Labour code of the Russian Federation”.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Khodairy AT, El Masry WS. Vocational rehabilitation and spinal cord injuries. In: Vocational rehabilitation. Collection de l’Académie européenne de médecine de réadaptation. Paris: Springer; 2006. p. 165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan CH, Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord inquiry: a qualitative study. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(1):3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuhrer MJ, Rintala DH, Hart KA, et al. Relationship of life satisfaction to impairment, disability, and handicap among persons with spinal cord injury living in the community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):552–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AB, Carnel CT, Ditunno JF, et al. Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(5):487–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, et al. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(8):877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen E, Rothenberg B, Zimmer JG. Assessing the health status of older adults. New York (NY): Springer; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wells GA, Russell AS, Haraoui B, et al. Validity of quality of life measurement tools-from generic to disease-specific. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2011;88:2–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Bostan C, et al. Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ): development and preliminary psychometric evidence of an ICF-based questionnaire for vocational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(3):498–510.
   Google Scholar
• Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire [Internet]. Swiss Paraplegic Research [cited 2019 Sep 23]. Available from: http://myworq.org/
   Google Scholar
• Husmann A, Escorpizo R, Finger ME. Examining work-related functioning in a physical therapy outpatient clinic: validity and reliability of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ). J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(2):156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Finger ME, Wicki-Roten V, Leger B, et al. Cross-Cultural adaptation of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) to French: a valid and reliable instrument to assess work functioning. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(2):350–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portmann Bergamaschi R, Escorpizo R, Staubli S, et al. Content validity of the work rehabilitation questionnaire-self-report version WORQ-SELF in a subgroup of spinal cord injury patients. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(3):225–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kievit AJ, Kuijer PP, Kievit RA, et al. A reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to score the impact of knee complaints on work following total knee arthroplasty: the WORQ. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1169–1175.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein J, Osborne RH, Elsworth GR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the health education impact questionnaire: experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):360–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 3-step cross cultural adaptation. Revised By Reuben Escorpizo 25.07.2015 Based on Epstein, Osborne, Elsworth, Beaton, & Guillemin 2015* Supplemented by: Beaton, Bombardier, Guillemin, & Ferraz. Spine; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinogradov VV. Leksikologiya i leksikografiya. Izbrannye trudy [Lexicology and lexicography. Selected works]. Moscow: Nauka; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Komissarov VN. Obshchaya teoriya perevoda [General theory of translation]. Moscow: CheRo; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar' [Linguistic encyclopaedic dictionary]. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopaedia; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kubryakova ES. Derivaciya, transpoziciya, konversiya [Derivation, transposition, conversion]. Moscow: Voprosy Yazykoznaniya; 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Komissarov VN. Komissarov teoriya perevoda (lingvisticheskie aspekty) [Theory of translation (linguistic aspects)]. Moscow: Vyssh. Shk.; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1995–2020 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/calque
   Google Scholar
• Escorpizo R. Conceptual framework: functioning and disability. In: Escorpizo R, Brage S, Homa D, et al., editors. Handbook of vocational rehabilitation and disability evaluation: application and implementation of the ICF. New York (NY): Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. PMID: 1593914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itzkovich M, Gelernter I, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1926–1933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalpakjian CZ, Scelza WM, Forchheimer MB, et al. Toussaint LL preliminary reliability and validity of a spinal cord injury secondary conditions scale. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(2):131–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, et al. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(5):531–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(6):535–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah CH, Brown JD. Reliability and validity of the short-form 12 item version 2 (SF-12v2) health-related quality of life survey and disutilities associated with relevant conditions in the U.S. Older adult population. J Clin Med. 2020;9(3):661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade MA, Reed KS, Krause JS. The impact of health behaviors and health management on employment after SCI: physical health and functioning. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016;22(1):39–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liese H, MacLeod L, Drews JR. Barriers to employment experienced by individuals with mobility impairment. SCI Psychosoc Process. 2002;15:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• New PW. Secondary conditions in a community sample of people with spinal cord damage. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39(6):665–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro CM, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H, et al. Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12(1):171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn G. Design and analysis of reliability studies. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Prel JB, Röhrig B, Hommel G, et al. Choosing statistical tests: part 12 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(19):343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. The chi-square test of independence. Biochem Med. 2013;23(2):143–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim CR, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set. BMJ Open. 2015;5(7):e007765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevor GB, Christine MF. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM2030; Interpreting RUMM Laboratory: Perth, Australia; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson JE. Testing and obtaining fit of data to the Rasch model. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1980;33(2):205–233.
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR-20 index and the Guttman scale response pattern. Educ Res Perspect. 1982;9(1):95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Tennant A. Measuring work-related functioning using the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(15):2795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritz R, Tennant A, Fellinghauer C, et al. The functional independence measure 18-item version can be reported as a unidimensional interval-scaled metric: internal construct validity revisited. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(3):193–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer H, Sireci SG, Thissen D. Differential testlet functioning: definitions and detection. J Educ Meas. 1991;28(3):197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen WM. Scaling performance assessments: strategies for managing local item dependence. J Educ Meas. 1993;30(3):187–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghaei P. Local dependency and Rasch measures. Rasch Meas Trans. 2008;21(3):1105–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy I, Tennant A, Young C. Rasch analysis of the WHOQOL-BREF in post-polio syndrome. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:873–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-08 [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Office ILO; 2012. ISBN 978-92-2-125953-7 [cited 2020 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/docs/publication08.pdf 
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1995–2020 [cited 2019 Sep 3]. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/intern
   Google Scholar
• Twiss J, McKenna SP, Graham J, et al. Applying Rasch analysis to evaluate measurement equivalence of different administration formats of the activity limitation scale of the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14:57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatov EV, Palatkin PP, F, SYu, et al. Znachenie oslozhnenij travmaticheskoj bolezni spinnogo mozga v dvigatel'noj reabilitacii pacientov [Significance of the traumatic spinal cord injury complications in motor rehabilitation of patients]. Med Kuzbasse. 2016;15(2):41–47.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilchenko E, Escorpizo R, Filatov E, et al. A descriptive study on the functioning profile of patients with spinal cord injury in a rehabilitation center in Russia. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(5):489–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen K, Woestyn M, Oostra K, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-VL). J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(3):514–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aran OT, Abaoğlu H, Ekici Çağlar G, et al. Cross-Cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of a Turkish version of the Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ-Turkish). J Occup Rehabil. 2020;31(2):285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar