286
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

A psychometric validation of the motives for physical activity measure for youth with intellectual disabilities (MPAM-ID)

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 6841-6850 | Received 29 Jan 2021, Accepted 15 Aug 2021, Published online: 16 Sep 2021

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington (TX): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
  • Dairo YM, Collett J, Dawes H, et al. Physical activity levels in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:209–219.
  • Frey GC, Stanish HI, Temple VA. Physical activity of youth with intellectual disability: review and research agenda. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2008;25(2):95–117.
  • Hinckson EA, Curtis A. Measuring physical activity in children and youth living with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(1):72–86.
  • Temple VA, Frey GC, Stanish HI. Physical activity of adults with mental retardation: review and research needs. Am J Health Promot. 2006;21(1):2–12.
  • Phillips AC, Holland AJ. Assessment of objectively measured physical activity levels in individuals with intellectual disabilities with and without down’s syndrome. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28618.
  • Maïano C. Prevalence and risk factors of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Obes Rev. 2011;12(3):189–197.
  • Maïano C, Hue O, Morin AJS, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(7):599–611.
  • Oeseburg B, Dijkstra GJ, Groothoff JW, et al. Prevalence of chronic health conditions in children with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011;49(2):59–85.
  • Bondár RZ, di Fronso S, Bortoli L, et al. The effects of physical activity or sport-based interventions on psychological factors in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2020;64(2):69–92.
  • Chanias AK, Reid G, Hoover ML. Exercise effects on health-related physical fitness of individuals with an intellectual disability: a meta-analysis. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1998; 15(2):119–140.
  • Harris L, Hankey C, Murray H, et al. The effects of physical activity interventions on preventing weight gain and the effects on body composition in young adults with intellectual disabilities: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Obes. 2015;5(4):198–210.
  • Jeng SC, Chang CW, Liu WY, et al. Exercise training on skill-related physical fitness in adolescents with intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Health J. 2017;10(2):198–206.
  • Kapsal NJ, Dicke T, Morin AJS, et al. Effects of physical activity on the physical and psychosocial health of youth with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(12):1187–1195. Dec 1
  • Ma Y, Wang L, Li M, et al. meta-analysis of the effects of exercise programs in improving the balance ability of children with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2020;45(2):144–154.
  • Maïano C, Hue O, Morin AJS, et al. Exercise interventions to improve balance for young people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(4):406–418.
  • Ogg-Groenendaal M, Hermans H, Claessens B. A systematic review on the effect of exercise interventions on challenging behavior for people with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(7):1507–1517.
  • Shin IS, Park EY. meta-analysis of the effect of exercise programs for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2012;33(6):1937–1947.
  • McGarty AM, Downs SJ, Melville CA, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase physical activity in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(4):312–329.
  • Lotan M, Henderson CM, Merrick J. Physical activity for adolescents with intellectual disability. Minerva Pediatr. 2006;58(3):219–226.
  • Stanish HI, Frey GC. Promotion of physical activity in individuals with intellectual disability. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50 Suppl 2:S178–S84.
  • Bodde AE, Seo DC. A review of social and environmental barriers to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(2):57–66.
  • Bossink LWM, van der Putten AA, Vlaskamp C. Understanding low levels of physical activity in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;68:95–110.
  • Gourlan M, Bernard P, Bortolon C, et al. Efficacy of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):50–66.
  • Rhodes RE, McEwan D, Rebar AL. Theories of physical activity behaviour change: a history and synthesis of approaches. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;42:100–109.
  • Hutzler Y, Korsensky O. Motivational correlates of physical activity in persons with an intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54(9):767–786.
  • Shapiro DR, Yun J. Sport motivation questionnaire for persons with mental retardation. Ther Recreation J. 2003;37:315–325.
  • Reid G, Vallerand RJ, Poulin C, et al. The development and validation of the pictorial motivation scale in physical activity. Motiv Emot. 2009;33(2):161–172.
  • Markland D, Ingledew DK. Exercise participation motives: a self-determination theory perspective. In: Hagger MSD, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2007. p. 23–34.
  • Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol Rev. 1984;91(3):328–346.
  • Nicholls JG. The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University; 1989.
  • Vallerand RJ. Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Zanna M, editor. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1997. p. 271–360.
  • Vallerand RJ. A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In: Roberts G, editor. Advances in motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2001. p. 263–319.
  • Vallerand RJ. 2007. A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for sport and physical activity. In: Hagger MSD, Chatzisarantis NLD, editors. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in exercise and sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; p. 255–279.
  • Frederick CM, Ryan RM. Differences in motivation for sport and exercise and their relations with participation and mental health. J of Sport Behav. 1993;16:124–146.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York (NY): Guilford; 2017.
  • Ryan RM, Frederick CM, Lepes D, et al. Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. Int J Sport Psycho. 1997; 28:335–354.
  • Albuquerque MR, Lopes MC, de Paula JJ, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the MPAM-R to brazilian portuguese and proposal of a new method to calculate factor scores. Front Psychol. 2017;8:261.
  • Gonçalves MP, Alchieri JC. Adaptation and validation of the motives for physical activity measure (MPAM-R). Avaliação Psicológica. 2010;9(1):28–138.
  • Vašíčková J, Pernicová H. Motivace k pohybové aktivitě (MPAM-R): vnitřní konzistence a vnitřní validita české verze dotazníku [inner consistency and inner validity of the czech version of motives for physical activities measure – revised (MPAM-R)]. Telesna Kultura. 2019;41(2):74–81.
  • Battistelli A, Montani F, Guicciardi M, et al. Regulation of exercise behaviour and motives for physical activities: the Italian validation of BREQ and MPAM-R questionnaires. Psychol Française. 2016;61(4):333–348.
  • Murcia JAM, Gimeno EC, Camacho AM. Validación de la escala de medida de los motivos Para la actividad Física-Revisada en españoles: diferencias por motivos de participación. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology. 2007;23:167–176.
  • Célis-Merchán GA. Adaptación al español de la escala revisada de motivos Para la actividad física (MPAM-R) y el cuestionario de clima deportivo (SCQ). Avances en Medición. 2006;4:73–90.
  • Jakobsen AM, Evjen E. Gender differences in motives for participation in sports and exercise among norwegian adolescents. BJHPA. 2018;10(2):92–101.
  • Król-Zielińska M, Groffik D, Bronikowski M, et al. Understanding the motives of undertaking physical activity with different levels of intensity among adolescents: results of the INDARES study. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–8.
  • Vašíčková J, Hřebíčková H, Groffik D. Gender, age and body mass differences influencing the motivation for physical activity among polish youths. J Sports Sci. 2014;2:1–12.
  • Biddle SJ, Wang CK. Motivation and self-perception profiles and links with physical activity in adolescent girls. J Adolesc. 2003;26(6):687–701.
  • Labbrozzi D, Robazza C, Bertollo M, et al. Pubertal development, physical self-perception, and motivation toward physical activity in girls. J Adolesc. 2013;36(4):759–765.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed., text revised. Arlington (TX): American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
  • Weschler D. Weschler intelligence scale for children. 4th ed. London (UK): Pearson; 2003.
  • Roid G, Miller LJ. Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised. Chicago (IL): Stoelting; 1997.
  • Marsh HW, Tracey DK, Craven RG. Multidimensional self-concept structure for preadolescents with mild intellectual disabilities: a hybrid multigroup–MIMC approach to factorial invariance and latent mean differences. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(5):795–818.
  • Muthén LK, Muthén B. Mplus user’s guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles (CA): Muthén & Muthén; 2017.
  • Asparouhov T, Muthén BO, Morin AJS. Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. J Manag. 2015;41(6):1561–1577.
  • Mai Y, Zhang Z, Wen Z. Comparing exploratory structural equation modeling and existing approaches for multiple regression with latent variables. Struct Equ Model. 2018;25(5):737–479.
  • Guay F, Morin AJS, Litalien D, et al. Application of exploratory structural equation modeling to evaluate the academic motivation scale. J Exp Educ. 2015;83(1):51–82.
  • Litalien D, Gillet N, Gagné M, et al. Self-determined motivation profiles among undergraduate students: a robust test of profile similarity as a function of gender and age. Learn Individ Differ. 2019;70:39–52.
  • Litalien D, Guay F, Morin AJS. Motivation for PhD studies: scale development and validation. Learn Individ Differ. 2015;41:1–13.
  • Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model. 2009;16(3):397–438.
  • Browne MW. An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res. 2001;36(1):111–150.
  • McDonald RP. Theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970;23(1):1–21.
  • Hu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6(1):1–55.
  • Marsh HW, Hau K-T, Grayson D. Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In: Maydeu-Olivares A, McArdle J, editors. Contemporary psychometrics. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 2005. p. 275–340.
  • Millsap RE. Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York (NY): Routledge; 2011.
  • Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement. Struct Equ Model. 2007;14(3):464–504.
  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002;9(2):233–255.
  • Marsh HW, Nagengast B, Morin AJS. Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Dev Psychol. 2013;49(6):1194–1218.
  • Morin AJS, Marsh HW, Nagengast B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, eds. Structural equation modeling: a second course. 2nd ed. Charlotte (NC): Information Age; 2013. p. 395–438.
  • Morin AJS, Myers ND, Lee S. Modern factor analytic techniques: bifactor models, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor-ESEM. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund RC, editors. Handbook of sport psychology. 4th ed. London (UK): Wiley; 2020. p. 1044–1073.
  • Maïano C, Aimé A, Salvas M-C, et al. Prevalence and correlates of bullying perpetration and victimization among school-aged youth with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;49:181–195.
  • Harter S. Effectance motivation reconsidered. Toward a developmental model. Hum Dev. 1978;21(1):34–64.
  • Klint KA, Weiss MR. Perceived competence and motives for participating in youth sports: a test of Harter’s competence motivation theory. J Sport Psychol. 1987;9(1):55–65.
  • Weiss MR, Ebbeck V. Self-esteem and perceptions of competence in youth sport: theory, research, and enhancement strategies. In: Bar-Or O. editor. The encyclopaedia of sports medicine, volume VI, the child and adolescent athlete. Oxford (UK): Blackwell; 1996. p. 364–382.
  • Garn AC, Morin AJS. University students’ use of motivational regulation during one semester. Learn Instruct. 2021;74:101436.
  • Guay F, Morin AJS, Litalien D, et al. Trajectories of self-determined motivation during the secondary school: a growth mixture analysis. J Educ Psychol. 2021;113(2):390–410.
  • Taylor IM. Reciprocal effects of motivation in physical education and self-reported physical activity. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2017;31:131–138.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.