Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with arm–shoulder–hand disorders. A systematic review of the literature

References

• Wiitavaara B, Bjorklund M, Brulin C, et al. How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders? A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with neck disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(19):2227–2235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiitavaara B, Heiden M. Content and psychometric evaluations of questionnaires for assessing physical function in people with low back disorders. A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(2):163–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor AM, Phillips K, Patel KV, et al. Assessment of physical function and participation in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT/OMERACT recommendations. Pain. 2016;157(9):1836–1850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimeno-Santos E, Frei A, Dobbels F, et al. Validity of instruments to measure physical activity may be questionable due to a lack of conceptual frameworks: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alreni ASE, Harrop D, Lowe A, et al. Measures of upper limb function for people with neck pain. A systematic review of measurement and practical properties. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;29:155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bot SD, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(4):335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai AS, Dramis A, Hearnden AJ. Critical appraisal of subjective outcome measures used in the assessment of shoulder disability. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(1):9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19(10):1109–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(5):623–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA. A practical tool for evaluation of function: the simple shoulder test. In: Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, editors. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability. Rosemont (IL): American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1993. p. 501–518.
   Google Scholar
• McLean SJ, Balassoubramanien T, Kulkarnai M, et al. Measuring upper limb disability in non-specific neck pain: a clinical performance measure. Int J Phys Ther Rehab. 2010;1:44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lomond KV, Cote JN. Shoulder functional assessments in persons with chronic neck/shoulder pain and healthy subjects: Reliability and effects of movement repetition. Work. 2011;38:169–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lo IK, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: the Western Ontario osteoarthritis of the shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9(8):771–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollinshead RM, Mohtadi NG, Vande Guchte RA, et al. Two 6-year follow-up studies of large and massive rotator cuff tears: comparison of outcome measures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9(5):373–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(3):420–426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr KN, Aaronson NK, Alonso J, et al. Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria. Clin Ther. 1996;18(5):979–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Methodological considerations in functional assessment. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1987;14(Suppl 15):6–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, et al. Physical outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. Hamilton (ON); Baltimore (MD): BC Decker; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Fink A. Conducting research literature reviews. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Inc; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Short version; 2001 [cited 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual; 2012 [cited 2017 May 11]. Available from: http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/COSMIN%20checklist%20manual%20v9.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The upper extremity collaborative group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, et al. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden GJ, Leffers P, Bouter LM. Shoulder disability questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(1):29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, et al. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res. 1991;4(4):143–149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L'Insalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(5):738–748.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Stratford DM. Development and initial validation of the upper extremity functional index. Physiother Can. 2001;53:259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Feuerstein M, Himmelstein J, et al. Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders. Development and validation of the upper extremity function scale. J Occup Environ Med. 1997;39(12):1195–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Michener LA, Burkett B, et al. The upper limb functional index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Hand Ther. 2006;19(3):328–348; quiz 49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Michener LA, Melloh M, et al. Modification of the upper limb functional index to a three-point response improves clinimetric properties. J Hand Ther. 2010;23(1):41–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley SP, Cote MP, Swanson B, Tafuto V, et al. The shoulder pain and disability index: is it sensitive and responsive to immediate change? Manual Ther. 2015;20(3):494–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley SP, Tafuto V, Cote M, et al. Reliability and relationship of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire with the shoulder pain and disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with shoulder pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;35:464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerosch-Herold C, Chester R, Shepstone L, et al. An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):389–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoomes-de Graaf M, Scholten-Peeters W, Duijn E, et al. The responsiveness and interpretability of the shoulder pain and disability index. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(4):278–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL. Figuring out factors: the use and misuse of factor analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 1994;39(3):135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, et al. How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1043–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton D, Richards RR. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(6):565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesworth BM, Hamilton CB, Walton DM, et al. Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. Physiother Can. 2014;66(3):243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook KF, Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, et al. The measurement level and trait-specific reliability of 4 scales of shoulder functioning: an empiric investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(11):1558–1565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale LM, Strain-Riggs SR. Comparing responsiveness of the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand and the upper limb functional index. Work. 2013;46(3):243–250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton DE, Richards RR. Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(2):128–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(1):30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jester A, Harth A, Wind G, et al. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire: Determining functional activity profiles in patients with upper extremity disorders. J Hand Surg Br. 2005;30(1):23–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan ZJ, Smith CK, Silverstein BA. Responsiveness of the QuickDASH and SF-12 in workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: one-year follow-up. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):234–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoop N, Menendez ME, Mellema JJ, et al. The PROMIS global health questionnaire correlates with the QuickDASH in patients with upper extremity illness. Hand. 2018;13(1):118–121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chester R, Jerosch-Herold C, Lewis J, et al. The SPADI and QuickDASH are similarly responsive in patients undergoing physical therapy for shoulder pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47(8):538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Yelland M, Melloh M, et al. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi A, Menendez ME, Kachooei AR, et al. Update of the quick DASH questionnaire to account for modern technology. Hand. 2016;11(4):403–409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huisstede BM, Feleus A, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. Is the disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) also valid and responsive in patients with neck complaints. Spine. 2009;34(4):E130–E138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta S, Macdermid JC, Carlesso LC, et al. Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain. Spine. 2010;35:2150–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan ZJ, Smith CK, Silverstein BA. Assessing validity of the QuickDASH and SF-12 as surveillance tools among workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. J Hand Ther. 2008;21(4):354–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okochi J, Utsunomiya S, Takahashi T. Health measurement using the ICF: test-retest reliability study of ICF codes and qualifiers in geriatric care. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtaiş Y, Oztuna D, Küçükdeveci AA, et al. Reliability, construct validity and measurement potential of the ICF comprehensive core set for osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljunied M, Frederickson N. Utility of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) for educational psychologists’ work. Educ Psychol Pract. 2014;30(4):380–392.
   Google Scholar
• Thoomes-de Graaf M, Scholten-Peeters W, Karel Y, et al. One question might be capable of replacing the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) when measuring disability: a prospective cohort study. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(2):401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CL, Lester S, Taylor AW, et al. Factor structure and validity of the shoulder pain and disability index in a population-based study of people with shoulder symptoms. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachin K. The shoulder pain and disability index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The shoulder pain and disability index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther. 1997;77(10):1079–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JW Jr., Holleman DR Jr., Simel DL. Measuring shoulder function with the shoulder pain and disability index. J Rheumatol. 1995;22(4):727–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul A, Lewis M, Shadforth MF, et al. A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(10):1293–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Winter AF, van der Heijden GJ, Scholten RJ, et al. The shoulder disability questionnaire differentiated well between high and low disability levels in patients in primary care, in a cross-sectional study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(11):1156–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Windt DA, van der Heijden GJ, de Winter AF, et al. The responsiveness of the shoulder disability questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(2):82–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton CB, Chesworth BM. A Rasch-validated version of the upper extremity functional index for interval-level measurement of upper extremity function. Phys Ther. 2013;93(11):1507–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, et al. A comparison of the ability of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. J Hand Ther. 2010;23(1):31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar