Understanding amputation care in England and Scotland: a qualitative exploration of patient stories posted on an online patient feedback site

References

• Hughes W, Goodall R, Salciccioli JD, et al. Editor's choice – trends in lower extremity amputation incidence in European Union 15+ countries 1990–2017. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(4):602–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffen A, Pepper CJ, Sayers RD, et al. Protocol: epidemiology of major lower limb amputation using routinely collected electronic health data in the UK: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e037053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCEPOD [Internet]. Lower limb amputation: working together. 2004. Available from: http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2014report2/downloads/WorkingTogetherFullReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad N, Thomas GN, Gill P, et al. Lower limb amputation in England: prevalence, regional variation and relationship with revascularisation, deprivation and risk factors. A retrospective review of hospital data. J R Soc Med. 2014;107(12):483–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues BT, Vangaveti VN, Malabu UH. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic lower limb amputation: a clinic-based case control study. J Diabetes Res. 2016;2016:5941957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer LA, Sevelda F, Fraberger G, et al. Body image and self-esteem in lower-limb amputees. PLOS One. 2014;9(3):e92943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado S, Briggs T, Fulton J, et al. Patient experience after lower extremity amputation for sarcoma in England: a national survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(12):1171–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torbjörnsson E, Ottosson C, Blomgren L, et al. The patient's experience of amputation due to peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Nurs. 2017;35(2):57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Columbo JA, Nolan BW, Stucke RS, et al. Below-knee amputation failure and poor functional outcomes are higher than predicted in contemporary practice. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2016;50(8):554–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedlow H, Cormier A, Provost M, et al. Patient perspectives on information needs for amputation secondary to vascular surgery: what, when, why, and how much? J Vasc Nurs. 2014;32(3):88–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradway JK, Malone JM, Racy J, et al. Psychological adaptation to amputation: an overview. Orthot Prosthet. 1984;38(3):46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Forshaw MJ. The experience of amputation and prosthesis use for adults: a metasynthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(14):1133–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14–15):837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk B, Edwards R, Behel J. Diversity in adjustment to a leg amputation: case illustrations of common themes. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14–15):944–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senra H, Oliveira RA, Leal I, et al. Beyond the body image: a qualitative study on how adults experience lower limb amputation. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(2):180–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atherton R, Robertson N. Psychological adjustment to lower limb amputation amongst prosthesis users. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(19):1201–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey LP, Sheard L, Lawton R, et al. How do healthcare staff respond to patient experience feedback online? A typology of responses published on care opinion. Patient Experience Journal. 2019;6(2):42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets RV. The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J Market Res. 2002;39(1):61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locock L, Skea Z, Alexander G, et al. Anonymity, veracity and power in online patient feedback: a quantitative and qualitative analysis of staff responses to patient comments on the ‘Care Opinion’ platform in Scotland. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207619899520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V. Thematic analysis [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://fnm.tums.ac.ir/userfiles/iao/workshop/5-thematicanalysisslides-prof.braun.pdf
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. Ethics guidelines for internet mediated research [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/Ethics%20Guidelines%20for%20Internet-mediated%20Research%20%282017%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna E. The emotional labour of researching sensitive topics online: considerations and implications. Qual Res. 2019;19(5):524–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel TR, Petroski GF, Kruse RL. Impact of amputation level and comorbidities on functional status of nursing home residents after lower extremity amputation. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(5):1323–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone W, Van De Mortel TF, Taylor B. A path of perpetual resilience: exploring the experience of a diabetes-related amputation through grounded theory. Contemp Nurse. 2011;39(1):20–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aravind M, Shauver MJ, Chung KC. A qualitative analysis of the decision-making process for patients with severe lower leg trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2019–2029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell J, Atherton H, Williams V, et al. Using online patient feedback to improve NHS services: the INQUIRE multimethod study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2019;7(38):1–150.
   Google Scholar
• Robert G. Participatory action research: using experience-based co-design (EBCD) to improve health care services. In: Ziebland S, Calabrase J, Coulter A, Locock L, editors. Understanding and using experiences of health and illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gerteis M. Through the patient's eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Iles V. Why Reforming the NHS Doesn’t Work. The importance of understanding how good people offer bad care [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.reallylearning.com/Free_Resources/MakingStrategyWork/reforming.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Murrells T, Robert G, Adams M, et al. Measuring relational aspects of hospital care in England with the ‘patient evaluation of emotional care during hospitalisation’ (PEECH) survey questionnaire. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e002211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attree M. Patients' and relatives' experiences and perspectives of ‘Good’ and ‘Not so Good’ quality care. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(4):456–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodosius C. Emotional labour in health care: the unmanaged heart of nursing. London: Routledge; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado C, Upton D, Ranse K, et al. Nurses' resilience and the emotional labour of nursing work: an integrative review of empirical literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;70:71–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maben J, Adams M, Peccei R, et al. ‘Poppets and parcels’: the links between staff experience of work and acutely ill older peoples' experience of hospital care. Int J Older People Nurs. 2012;7(2):83–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Day G, Robert G, Rafferty AM. Gratitude in health care: a meta-narrative review. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(14):2303–2315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Prasad G. Long-term mortality after lower-limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40(5):545–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine D. Patients, professionalism, and revalidation. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1265–1268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNair RP. The case for educating health care students in professionalism as the core content of interprofessional education. Med Educ. 2005;39(5):456–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams M, Maben J, Robert G. ‘It's sometimes hard to tell what patients are playing at’: how healthcare professionals make sense of why patients and families complain about care. Health. 2018;22(6):603–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquina PF, Tsao JW, Collins DM, et al. Quality of medical care provided to service members with combat related limb amputations: report of patient satisfaction. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(7):953–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitzman R. “Patient-time”, “doctor-time”, and “institution-time”: perceptions and definitions of time among doctors who become patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;66(2):147–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatri S, Whiteley I, Gullick J, et al. Marking time: the temporal experience of gastrointestinal cancer. Contemp Nurse. 2012;41(2):146–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton J. Hospital discharge and the temporal regulation of bodies. Time Soc. 2001;10(1):93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locock L, Robert G, Meier N. 2019. Patients, families, and care settings. In: Meier N, Dopson S, editors. Context in action and how to study it: illustrations from health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Robert G, Donetto S. Whose data is it anyway? Patient experience and service improvement. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2020;25(3):139–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa A, Jones F, Kulnik S, et al. Doing nothing? An ethnography of patients’ (in)activity on an acute stroke unit. Health. 2021. DOI:10.1177/1363459320969784
   Google Scholar