A scoping review of qualitative studies on parents’ perspectives on speech, language, and communication interventions

References

• Paul D, Roth FP. Guiding principles and clinical applications for speech-language pathology practice in early intervention. LSHSS. 2011;42(3):320–330.
   Google Scholar
• Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Evidence-based practice (EBP) [Internet]. Rockville (MD): ASHA; [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/research/ebp/
   Google Scholar
• Speech Pathology Australia. Professional standards for speech pathologists in Australia [Internet]. Melbourne (Australia): Speech Pathology Australia; 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: https://speechpathologyaustralia.cld.bz/Speech-Pathology-Australia-Professional-Standards-2020
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau KA, Bloom S, Van Cleave J, et al. Evidence for family-centered care for children with special health care needs: a systematic review. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(2):136–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Hamby D, Trivette CM, et al. Everyday family and community life and children’s naturally occurring learning opportunities. J Early Interv. 2000;23(3):151–164.
   Google Scholar
• Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB, et al. Evidence-based practice: step by step: the seven steps of evidence-based practice. Am J Nurs. 2010;110(1):51–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulstone S. Exploring the relationship between client perspectives, clinical expertise and research evidence. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17(3):211–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland P, McMillan S, McGillicuddy P, et al. What is “the patient perspective” in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories. Health. 2017;21(1):76–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velpry L. The patient’s view: issues of theory and practice. Cult Med Psychiatry. 2008;32(2):238–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. The seven pillars of quality. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990;114(11):1115–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico JS, Simmons-Mackie NN. Qualitative research and speech-language pathology: a tutorial for the clinical realm. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;12(2):131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin K, Meyer C, Scarinci N. What does “engagement” mean in early speech pathology intervention? A qualitative systematised review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(18):2665–2678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeat J, Roddam H. What do parents think about their involvement in speech-language pathology intervention? A qualitative critically appraised topic. Evid Based Commun Assess Interv [Internet]. 2019;13(1–2):15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh D, Downe S. Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005;50(2):204–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(4):365–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–2126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters M, Godfrey C, Mclnerney P, et al. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide (Australia): The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in early intervention: position statement [Internet]. Rockville (MD): ASHA; 2008 [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in early intervention: guidelines [Internet]. Rockville (MD): ASHA; 2008 [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: www.asha.org/policy/
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Core knowledge and skills in early intervention speech-language pathology practice [Internet]. Rockville (MD): ASHA; 2008 [cited 2021 Apr 5]. Available from: www.asha.org/policy/
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in early intervention: technical report [Internet]. Rockville (MD): ASHA; 2008 [cited 2021 Aug 16]. Available from: www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Employment Training and Youth Affairs Ministerial Council of Education. Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians [Internet]. Canberra (Australia): Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs Communiqué; 2008 [cited 2021 Aug 16]. Available from: http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/national_declaration_on_the_educational_goals_for_young_australians.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bercow J. A review of services for children and young people (0–19) with speech, language and communication needs [Internet]. UK: Department of Children, Schools and Families; 2008 [cited 2021 Aug 16]. Available from: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/8405/
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson R, Rheault W. Appraising and incorporating qualitative research in evidence-based practice. J Phys Ther Educ. 2004;18:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Milne J, Oberle K. Enhancing rigor in qualitative description: a case study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2005;32(6):413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen S, Crawford P, Mulla I. Exploring the acceptability of innovative technology: a pilot study using LENA with parents of young deaf children in the UK. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2017;33(2):117–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson KL, Balandin S, Stancliffe RJ. Alternative service delivery models for families with a new speech generating device: perspectives of parents and therapists. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;17(2):185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster JB, McCarthy JW. Designing augmentative and alternative communication applications: the results of focus groups with speech-language pathologists and parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunst CJ, Espe-Sherwindt M. Family-centered practices in early childhood intervention. Handbook of early child spec education. Cham (Switzerland): Springer; 2016. p. 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, et al. Family-centred service: a conceptual framework and research review. Fam Serv Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva (Switzerland): ICF; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Phoenix M, Jack SM, Rosenbaum PL, et al. A grounded theory of parents’ attendance, participation and engagement in children’s developmental rehabilitation services: part 2. The journey to child health and happiness. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(15):2151–2160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen de López KM, Feilberg J, Baena S, et al. “So, I told him to look for friends!” barriers and protecting factors that may facilitate inclusion for children with language disorder in everyday social settings: cross-cultural qualitative interviews with parents. Res Dev Disabil. 2021;115:103963. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422221001128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez M, Phoenix M, Saxena S, et al. Strategies used to engage hard-to-reach populations in childhood disability research: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(19):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie K, McAllister L, Davidson B, et al. Changing practice: implications of the world report on disability for responding to communication disability in under-served populations. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013;15(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason R. Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020;5(1):4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper C, Anderson KJ, Sanders P. Moderators of gender effects on parents’ talk to their children: a meta-analysis. Dev Psychol. 1998;34(1):3–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Simera I, Hoey J, et al. EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research. Open Med. 2008;2(2):e49–e50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munthe-Kaas H, Bohren MA, Glenton C, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agee J. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2009;22(4):431–447.
   Google Scholar
• Luciani M, Campbell K, Tschirhart H, et al. How to design a qualitative health research study. Part 1: design and purposeful sampling considerations come. Professini Inferm. 2019;72:152–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P. Family-centered theory: origins, development, barriers, and supports to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8):1618–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, King S, Rosenbaum P, et al. Family-centered caregiving and well- being of parents of children with … of parents of children with disabilities. J Pediatr Psychol. 1999;24(1):41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar