Patients’ and therapists’ experience and perception of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis

References

• Hankey GJ. Stroke. Lancet. 2017;389(10069):641–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arene N, Hidler J. Understanding motor impairment in the paretic lower limb after a stroke: a review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16(5):346–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(1):27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum ST, Chiu JKW, Tsang CPL, et al. Predicting walking function of patients one month poststroke using modified Rivermead mobility index on admission. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23(8):2117–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini I, Basílio ML, Polese JC, et al. Strength deficits of the paretic lower extremity muscles were the impairment variables that best explained restrictions in participation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(21):2158–2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrenelli E, Ippoliti E, Coccia M, et al. Features and predictors of activity limitations and participation restriction 2 years after intensive rehabilitation following first-ever stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51:575–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau-Pellicer M, Chamarro-Lusar A, Medina-Casanovas J, et al. Walking speed as a predictor of community mobility and quality of life after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26(5):349–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pournajaf S, Goffredo M, Agosti M, et al. Community ambulation of stroke survivors at 6 months follow-up: an observational study on sociodemographic and sub-acute clinical indicators. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;55(4):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Reynolds C, Mondal S, et al. Predicting home and community walking activity in people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(10):1582–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudberg AS, Berge E, Laska AC, et al. Stroke survivors’ priorities for research related to life after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;28(2):153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(4):459–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarin M, Sjöholm A, Nilsson ÅL, et al. A mapping study on physical activity in stroke rehabilitation: establishing the baseline. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(10):997–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacroix J, Daviet J-C, Borel B, et al. Physical activity level among stroke patients hospitalized in a rehabilitation unit. PM R. 2016;8(2):97–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gassert R, Dietz V. Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13:53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buesing C, Fisch G, O’Donnell M, et al. Effects of a wearable exoskeleton stride management assist system (SMA®) on spatiotemporal gait characteristics in individuals after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12(69):69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe H, Tanaka N, Inuta T, et al. Locomotion improvement using a hybrid assistive limb in recovery phase stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2006–2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshimoto T, Shimizu I, Hiroi Y, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: nonrandomized pilot study with concurrent control. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38(4):338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsurushima H, Mizukami M, Yoshikawa K, et al. Effectiveness of a walking program involving the hybrid assistive limb robotic exoskeleton suit for improving walking ability in stroke patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(10):e14001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Durocher M, et al. Exoskeleton for post-Stroke Recovery of Ambulation (ExStRA): study protocol for a mixed-methods study investigating the efficacy and acceptance of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D, Holloway CS, Morgado Ramirez DZ, et al. What are user perspectives of exoskeleton technology? A literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(2):160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, et al. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):409–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read E, Woolsey C, McGibbon CA, et al. Physiotherapists’ experiences using the Ekso bionic exoskeleton with patients in a neurological rehabilitation hospital: a qualitative study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2020;2020:2939573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Pysklywec A, Chau L, et al. Therapists’ experience of training and implementing an exoskeleton in a rehabilitation centre. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–7. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2020.1789765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie DR, Mortenson WB, Durocher M, et al. Efficacy of an exoskeleton-based physical therapy program for non-ambulatory patients during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2021. DOI:10.1186/s12984-021-00942-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turchetti G, Vitiello N, Trieste L, et al. Why effectiveness of robot-mediated neurorehabilitation does not necessarily influence its adoption. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;7:143–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark AM. The qualitative–quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to post-positivism and reconciliation. J Adv Nurs. 1998;27(6):1242–1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017;4:2333393617742282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient, 1: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27:425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Marconi VC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual Health Res. 2017;27(4):591–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, et al. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal. 2021;13(2):201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manns PJ, Hurd C, Yang JF. Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomassen GKK, Jørgensen V, Normann B. “Back at the same level as everyone else” – user perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5(1):103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cumming TB, Packer M, Kramer SF, et al. The prevalence of fatigue after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(9):968–977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asselin P, Knezevic S, Kornfeld S, et al. Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):147–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang SR, Kobetic R, Triolo RJ. Effect of exoskeletal joint constraint and passive resistance on metabolic energy expenditure: implications for walking in paraplegia. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molteni F, Gasperini G, Gaffuri M, et al. Wearable robotic exoskeleton for overground gait training in sub-acute and chronic hemiparetic stroke patients: preliminary results. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(5):676–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni MF, Melegari C, De Cola MC, et al. What does best evidence tell us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;48:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Elsner B, Werner C, et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD006185.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Jayaraman A, Mummidisetty CK, et al. Experience of robotic exoskeleton use at four spinal cord injury model systems centers. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(4):256–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar