The value of social networks to individuals with a severe traumatic brain injury: a mixed methods approach

References

• Brown J, Hux K, Hey M, et al. Exploring cognitive support use and preference by college students with TBI: a mixed-methods study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;41(2):483–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Struchen MA, Yablon SA, et al. Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(6):678–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odgaard L, Poulsen I, Kammersgaard LP, Johnsen SP, et al. Surviving severe traumatic brain injury in Denmark: incidence and predictors of highly specialized rehabilitation. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Boland P, Taylor WJ, et al. Establishing a person-centred framework of self-identity after traumatic brain injury: a grounded theory study to inform measure development. BMJ Open. 2014;4(5):e004630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchos E, Easton A, Haak C, et al. Social factors predictive of social integration for adults with brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(17):2062–2069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: a review of research approaches and findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4 Suppl 2):S21–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström A, Lund ML. The complexity of participation in daily life: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Struchen MA. Interpersonal relationships and traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26(1):1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H, Pelchat D, Swaine B, et al. The experiences of individuals with a traumatic brain injury, families, physicians and health professionals regarding care provided throughout the continuum. Brain Inj. 2005;19(8):585–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L. Social Capital and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(4):478–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Lin N. Social Capital and health inequality: evidence from Taiwan. J Health Soc Behav. 2009;50(2):149–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch RJ, Ferry SM. Social networks as support interventions following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(1):11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diderichsen F, Andersen I, Manuel C, et al. Health inequality-determinants and policies. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8 Suppl):12–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bystrup MR, Hindhede AL. Conversion of social capital in the rehabilitation process of adolescents following an acquired brain injury. In: Harsløf I, Poulsen I, Larsen K, editors. New dynamics of disability and rehabilitation interdisciplinary perspectives. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. Analyzing social networks. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of cognitive functioning: rehabilitation of the head injured adult: comprehensive physical management. Dowey (CA): Professional Staff Association of The Rancho Los Amigos Hospital, Inc.; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer CS. What do we mean by ‘friend’? An inductive study. Social Networks. 1982;3(4):287–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke DA, Harris JK. Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28(1):69–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung KKS, Hossain L, David J. Exploring sociocentric and egocentric approaches for social network analysis. 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Management in Asia Pacific; Wellington, New Zealand Victoria University of Wellington; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Scheibelhofer E. Combining narration‐based interviews with topical interviews: methodological reflections on research practices. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2008;11(5):403–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke AE. Situational analyses: grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction. 2003;26(4):553–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz G. Odious comparisons: incommensurability, the case study, and “small N’s” in sociology. Sociol Theory. 2004;22(3):371–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin N. Social Capital: a theory of socal structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 41.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam S,B. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 2nd ed. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stake RE. Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Radley A, Chamberlain K. Health psychology and the study of the case: from method to analytic concern. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(3):321–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati P, Archer MS. The relational subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norup A, Perrin PB, Cuberos-Urbano G, et al. Family needs after brain injury: a cross cultural study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(2):203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon A, Lin J, Stergiou-Kita M. Family members facilitating community re-integration and return to productivity following traumatic brain injury – motivations, roles and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(5):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Clark A, Pappadis MR. What is community integration anyway? Defining meaning following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25(2):121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan SP. Social support, emotional distress, and vocational outcomes among persons with brain injuries. Rehabil Couns Bull. 1990;34(1):16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan SP. Psychosocial adjustment three years after traumatic brain injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 1991;5(4):360–369.
   Google Scholar
• Graff HJ, Christensen U, Poulsen I, et al. Patient perspectives on navigating the field of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a qualitative thematic analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(8):926–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldager R. Inequality in neurorehabilitation: different practices among patients and relatives during rehabilitation after stroke and severe traumatic brain injury: a qualitative study [PhD thesis]. Denmark: Aalborg University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bystrup MR. Social network relations in neurorehabilitation Trajectories – an entrance to studying inequality in the Danish welfare state [PhD thesis]. Denmark: Aalborg University; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Pow J, Gayen K, Elliott L, et al. Understanding complex interactions using social network analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(19–20):2772–2779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bidart C, Charbonneau J. How to generate personal networks: issues and tools for a sociological perspective. Field Methods. 2011;23(3):266–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadushin C. Who benefits from network analysis: ethics of social network research. Soc Netw Anal. 2005;27(2):139–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doser K, Poulsen I, Wuensch A, et al. Psychological outcome after severe traumatic brain injury in adolescents and young adults: the chronic phase. Brain Injury. 2018;32(1):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AW, Moessner AM, Mandrekar J, et al. A survey of very-long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury among members of a population-based incident cohort. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(2):167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti E. Qualitative networks: mixed methods in sociological research. London: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bidart C, Lavenu D. Evolutions of personal networks and life events. Socl Netw. 2005;27(4):359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar