Cross cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of Central Sensitization Inventory in Arabic language

References

• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults – United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(36):1001–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth FM, March LM, Brnabic AJ, et al. Chronic pain in Australia: a prevalence study. Pain. 2001;89(2):127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain. 2019;160(1):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schappert SM, Burt CW. Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 2001–02. Vital Health Stat. 2006;13:1–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gureje O, Von Korff M, Simon GE, et al. Persistent pain and well-being: a World Health Organization study in primary care. JAMA. 1998;280(2):147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majlesi J. Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain of 3–6-month duration already have low levels of health-related quality of life and physical activity. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(11):81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schur EA, Afari N, Furberg H, et al. Feeling bad in more ways than one: comorbidity patterns of medically unexplained and psychiatric conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(6):818–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: uncovering the relation between pain and plasticity. Anesthesiology. 2007;106(4):864–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeser JD, Treede RD. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain. 2008;137(3):473–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimenti RL, Frey-Law LA, Sluka KA. A mechanism-based approach to physical therapist management of pain. Phys Ther. 2018;98(5):302–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs J, Van Houdenhove B, Oostendorp RA. Recognition of central sensitization in patients with musculoskeletal pain: application of pain neurophysiology in manual therapy practice. Man Ther. 2010;15(2):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latremoliere A, Woolf CJ. Central sensitization: a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural plasticity. J Pain. 2009;10(9):895–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunus MB. Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: the unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007;36(6):339–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardeh D, Mannion RJ, Woolf CJ. Toward a mechanism-based approach to pain diagnosis. J Pain. 2016;17(9 Suppl.):T50–T69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maihöfner C, Jesberger F, Seifert F, et al. Cortical processing of mechanical hyperalgesia: a MEG study. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(1):64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starkweather AR, Heineman A, Storey S, et al. Methods to measure peripheral and central sensitization using quantitative sensory testing: a focus on individuals with low back pain. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;29:237–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer TG, Neblett R, Cohen H, et al. The development and psychometric validation of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2012;12(4):276–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neblett R, Hartzell MM, Mayer TG, et al. Establishing clinically relevant severity levels for the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2017;17(2):166–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scerbo T, Colasurdo J, Dunn S, et al. Measurement properties of the Central Sensitization Inventory: a systematic review. Pain Pract. 2018;18(4):544–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Koh IJ, Kim CK, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for knee osteoarthritis. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0242912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neblett R, Cohen H, Choi Y, et al. The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): establishing clinically significant values for identifying central sensitivity syndromes in an outpatient chronic pain sample. J Pain. 2013;14(5):438–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noack R, Gamio L. The world’s languages, in 7 maps and charts. Washington Post. 2015;4:65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkawi A, Sullivan M, Abolkhair A, et al. Development and validation of Arabic version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(5):63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wilgen CP, Vuijk PJ, Kregel J, et al. Psychological distress and widespread pain contribute to the variance of the Central Sensitization Inventory: a cross-sectional study in patients with chronic pain. Pain Pract. 2018;18(2):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andias R, Silva AG. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the European Portuguese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in adolescents with musculoskeletal chronic pain. Pain Pract. 2020;20(5):480–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Nishigami T, Mibu A, et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Central Sensitization Inventory in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0188719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aburuz S, Bulatova N, Twalbeh M, et al. The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the EQ-5D: a study from Jordan. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(4):304–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemli J, Drira C, Felfel H, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life using a hybrid approach: Tunisian value set for the EQ-5D-3L. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(5):1445–1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-3L user guide; 2018. Available from: https://euroqol.org/publications/user-guides
   Google Scholar
• Mikkonen J, Luomajoki H, Airaksinen O, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Finnish version of the Central Sensitization Inventory and its relationship with dizziness and postural control. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide K, Yasuda T, Hasegawa T, et al. Evaluation of the Central Sensitization Inventory score in elderly adults with musculoskeletal examination. Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31:885–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain. 1986;27(1):117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 (Suppl.1):S17–S24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Tomé-Pires C, de la Vega R, et al. What determines whether a pain is rated as mild, moderate, or severe? The importance of pain beliefs and pain interference. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(5):414–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Cristobal E, Flavián C, Guinalíu M. Perceived E‐Service Quality (PeSQ). Manag Serv Qual. 2007;17(3):317–340.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peat J, Mellis C, Williams K. Health science research: a handbook of quantitative methods. NSW (Australia): Allen & Unwin; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropract Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson G, Nevill AM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998;26(4):217–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabbe PFM. Chapter 7 – validity. In: Krabbe PFM, editor. The measurement of health and health status. San Diego: Academic Press; 2017. p. 113–134.
   Google Scholar
• Akoglu H. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA, et al. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med. 1997;20(6):589–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivek P, Singh SN, Mishra S, et al. Parallel analysis engine to aid in determining number of factors to retain using R [computer software]; 2017. Available from: https://analytics.gonzaga.edu/parallelengine/
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe LP, Carman KL, Szydlowski V, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff. 2019;38(3):359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mol M. Variation in modern standard Arabic in radio news broadcasts: a synchronic descriptive investigation into the use of complementary particles. Leuven (Belgium): Peeters Publishers; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Jha J, Pathak A, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgeon JA, Zautra AJ. Social pain and physical pain: shared paths to resilience. Pain Manag. 2016;6(1):63–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmulson MJ, Drossman DA. What is new in Rome IV. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;23(2):151–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilika P, Neblett R, Georgoudis G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2020;20(2):188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitance L, Piraux E, Lannoy B, et al. Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the French version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Manual Ther. 2016;25:e83–e84.
   Google Scholar
• Knezevic A, Neblett R, Jeremic-Knezevic M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Serbian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2018;18(4):463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caumo W, Antunes LC, Elkfury JL, et al. The Central Sensitization Inventory validated and adapted for a Brazilian population: psychometric properties and its relationship with brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Pain Res. 2017;10:2109–2122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans E, Ickmans K, Van Dyck D, et al. Association between symptoms of central sensitization and cognitive behavioral factors in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a cross-sectional study. J Manipulat Physiol Ther. 2018;41(2):92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kregel J, Schumacher C, Dolphens M, et al. Convergent validity of the Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory: associations with psychophysical pain measures, quality of life, disability, and pain cognitions in patients with chronic spinal pain. Pain Pract. 2018;18(6):777–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin LD, Leech NL. Understanding correlation: factors that affect the size of r. J Exp Educ. 2006;74(3):249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute M, Laekeman M, Kuss K, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the German Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-GE). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks E, Voogt L, Lenoir D, et al. Convergent validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory in chronic whiplash-associated disorders; associations with quantitative sensory testing, pain intensity, fatigue, and psychosocial factors. Pain Med. 2020;21(12):3401–3412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohashi Y, Fukushima K, Inoue G, et al. Central Sensitization Inventory scores correlate with pain at rest in patients with hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurth A, Nijzink-Ter Steege J, Scheepbouwer P, et al. Assessment of central sensitization in breast cancer survivors: convergent validity and use of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and its short-form as a clustering tool. Clin Pract. 2021;11(3):607–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka K, Nishigami T, Mibu A, et al. Combination of pain location and pain duration is associated with central sensitization-related symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional study. Pain Pract. 2021;21(6):646–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CM, Buenaver LF, Finan P, et al. Sleep, pain catastrophizing, and central sensitization in knee osteoarthritis patients with and without insomnia. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67(10):1387–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel NA, Nijs J, Meeus M, et al. Central sensitization and altered central pain processing in chronic low back pain: fact or myth? Clin J Pain. 2013;29(7):625–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meints SM, Mawla I, Napadow V, et al. The relationship between catastrophizing and altered pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low-back pain. Pain. 2019;160(4):833–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigetoh H, Tanaka Y, Koga M, et al. The mediating effect of central sensitization on the relation between pain intensity and psychological factors: a cross-sectional study with mediation analysis. Pain Res Manag. 2019;2019:3916135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinjikji W, Luetmer PH, Comstock B, et al. Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(4):811–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the U.K. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2220–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedson J, Croft PR. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knezevic A, Neblett R, Colovic P, et al. Convergent and discriminant validity of the Serbian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Pain Pract. 2020;20(7):724–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarotto A, Viti C, Sulli A, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Italian version of the Central Sensitization Inventory. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;37:20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kregel J, Vuijk PJ, Descheemaeker F, et al. The Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): factor analysis, discriminative power, and test–retest reliability. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(7):624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, Neblett R, Chiarotto A, et al. Dimensionality and reliability of the Central Sensitization Inventory in a pooled multicountry sample. J Pain. 2018;19(3):317–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright KB. Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2006;10(3).
   Google Scholar