317
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

An ICF-based assessment schedule to facilitate the assessment and reporting of functioning in manual medicine – low back pain as a case in point

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 8339-8348 | Received 06 May 2021, Accepted 28 Nov 2021, Published online: 17 Dec 2021

References

  • Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):2006–2017.
  • Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(7):493–505.
  • DeStefano LA. Greenman’s principles of manual medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
  • Walker J, Mertens UK, Schmidt CO, et al. Effect on healthcare utilization and costs of spinal manual therapy for acute low back pain in routine care: a propensity score matched cohort study. PLOS One. 2017;12(5):e0177255.
  • Chevan J, Riddle DL. Factors associated with care seeking from physicians, physical therapists, or chiropractors by persons with spinal pain: a population-based study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(7):467–476.
  • Kinge JM, Knudsen AK, Skirbekk V, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders in Norway: prevalence of chronicity and use of primary and specialist health care services. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:75.
  • Hurwitz EL. Epidemiology: spinal manipulation utilization. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2012;22(5):648–654.
  • Paanalahti K, Holm LW, Nordin M, et al. Three combinations of manual therapy techniques within naprapathy in the treatment of neck and/or back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:176.
  • Rubinstein SM, de Zoete A, van Middelkoop M, et al. Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019;364:l689.
  • Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, et al. What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet. 2018;391(10137):2356–2367.
  • Tagliaferri SD, Miller CT, Owen PJ, et al. Domains of chronic low back pain and assessing treatment effectiveness: a clinical perspective. Pain Pract. 2020;20(2):211–225.
  • Toomey D, Reid D, White S. How manual therapy provided a gateway to a biopsychosocial management approach in an adult with chronic post-surgical low back pain: a case report. J Man Manip Ther. 2021;29(2):107–132.
  • Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD000963.
  • Marin TJ, Van Eerd D, Irvin E, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for subacute low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(6):CD002193.
  • van Erp RMA, Huijnen IPJ, Jakobs MLG, et al. Effectiveness of primary care interventions using a biopsychosocial approach in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Pain Pract. 2019;19(2):224–241.
  • Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Pinto RZ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(11):2791–2803.
  • Nicol R, Yu H, Selb M, et al. How does the measurement of disability in low back pain map unto the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)? A scoping review of the manual medicine literature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100(4):367–395.
  • Kirchberger I, Stucki G, Bohni U, et al. Towards an outcome documentation in manual medicine: a first proposal of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) intervention categories for manual medicine based on a Delphi survey. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;45(3):415–426.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Functioning: the third health indicator in the health system and the key indicator for rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(1):134–138.
  • Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, et al. A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):105–117.
  • Cieza A, Stucki G, Weigl M, et al. ICF core sets for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2004;(44 Suppl):69–74.
  • Prodinger B, Reinhardt JD, Selb M, et al. Towards system-wide implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in routine practice: developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF generic and rehabilitation set. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(6):508–514.
  • Axen I, Mior S, Roe Y, et al. Contextualizing the lived experiences of patients with low back pain from different countries according to the ICF framework. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(5):jrm00189.
  • Cieza A, Oberhauser C, Bickenbach J, et al. Towards a minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:218.
  • Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–144.
  • Kongsted A, Johannesen E, Leboeuf-Yde C. Feasibility of the STarT back screening tool in chiropractic clinics: a cross-sectional study of patients with low back pain. Chiropr Man Ther. 2011;19:10.
  • Scheuringer M, Stucki G, Huber EO, et al. ICF core set for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(7–8):405–410.
  • Boonen A, Braun J, van der Horst Bruinsma IE, et al. ASAS/WHO ICF core sets for ankylosing spondylitis (AS): how to classify the impact of AS on functioning and health. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):102–107.
  • Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;387(10034):2207–2217.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.