197
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Impact of decompressive craniectomy on functional outcome of severe acquired brain injuries patients, at discharge from intensive inpatient rehabilitation

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 8375-8381 | Received 25 Jun 2021, Accepted 02 Dec 2021, Published online: 20 Dec 2021

References

  • Castellanos-Pinedo F, Cid-Gala M, Duque P, et al. Grupo de trabajo del plan de atención al daño cerebral sobrevenido de Extremadura. Dano cerebral sobrevenido: propuesta de definicion, criterios diagnosticos y clasificacion [acquired brain injury: a proposal for its definition, diagnostic criteria and classification. Rev Neurol. 2012;54(6):357–366.
  • Masson F, Thicoipe M, Aye P, et al. Epidemiology of severe brain injuries: a prospective population-based study. J Trauma. 2001;51(3):481–489.
  • II Conferenza di Consenso Nazionale, Verona, 2005.
  • Lorenz L, Katz G. Severe brain injury in Massachusetts: Assessing the continuum of care. Issue Brief 2015;10(45):1–62.
  • Smith M. Refractory intracranial hypertension: the role of decompressive craniectomy. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(6):1999–2008.
  • Guerra WK, Gaab MR, Dietz H, et al. Surgical decompression for traumatic brain swelling: indications and results. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(2):187–196.
  • Kolias AG, Kirkpatrick PJ, Hutchinson PJ. Decompressive craniectomy: past, present and future. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(7):405–415.
  • Brown DA, Wijdicks EF. Decompressive craniectomy in acute brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;140:299–318.
  • Gopalakrishnan MS, Shanbhag NC, Shukla DP, et al. Complications of decompressive craniectomy. Front Neurol. 2018;9:977.
  • Hawryluk GWJ, Rubiano AM, Totten AM, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury: 2020 update of the decompressive craniectomy Recommendations. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(3):427–434.
  • Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, DECRA Trial Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, et al. Patient outcomes at twelve months after early decompressive craniectomy for diffuse traumatic brain injury in the randomized DECRA clinical trial. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(5):810–816.
  • Barthélemy EJ, Melis M, Gordon E, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016;88:411–420.
  • Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, et al. RESCUEicp trial collaborators. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1119–1130.
  • Sahuquillo J, Arikan F. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;25(1):CD003983.
  • Alexander P, Heels-Ansdell D, Siemieniuk R, et al. Hemicraniectomy versus medical treatment with large MCA infarct: a review and Meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e014390.
  • Yao Z, Ma L, You C, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:121–128.
  • Mohan Rajwani K, Crocker M, Moynihan B. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of malignant Middle cerebral artery infarction. Br J Neurosurg. 2017;31(4):401–409.
  • Bender A, Jox RJ, Grill E, et al. Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(14):235–242.
  • Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the glasgow outcome scale and the extended glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573–585.
  • Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, et al. Exploring the reliability of the modified rankin scale. Stroke. 2009;40(3):762–766.
  • Estraneo A, Moretta P, De Tanti A, et al.; Italian Crs-R Multicentre Validation Group. An italian multicentre validation study of the coma recovery scale revised. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(5):627–634.
  • Elm V, Altman E, Egger DG, et al.; STROBE Initiative. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–349.
  • De Bonis P, Pompucci A, Mangiola A, et al. Post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy: an underestimated risk factor. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(11):1965–1970.
  • Battel I, Calvo I, Walshe M. Cross-Cultural validation of the italian version of the functional oral intake scale. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(3-4):117–123.
  • Hakiki B, Draghi F, Scarpino M, et al. Critical illness polyneuromyopathy: Functional impact after severe acquired brain injuries. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;142(6):574–584.
  • Seel RT, Sherer M, Whyte J, et al.; American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Brain Injury-Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group, Disorders of Consciousness Task Force. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1795–1813.
  • Hirschberg R, Giacino JT. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Neurol Clin. 2011;29(4):773–786.
  • Kotchoubey B, Pavlov YG. A systematic review and Meta-Analysis of the relationship between brain data and the outcome in disorders of consciousness. Front Neurol. 2018;9:315.
  • Chibbaro S, Di Rocco F, Mirone G, et al. Decompressive craniectomy and early cranioplasty for the management of severe head injury: a prospective multicenter study on 147 patients. World Neurosurg. 2011;75(3-4):558–562.
  • Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, et al. Early cranioplasty is associated with greater neurological improvement: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(3):278–288.
  • Goedemans T, Verbaan D, van der Veer O, et al. Complications in cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: timing of the intervention. J Neurol. 2020;267(5):1312–1320.
  • De Cola MC, Corallo F, Pria D, et al. Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: a systematic review. Brain Behav. 2018;8(11):e01106.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.