Health-related quality of life in patients with lower limb amputation – an assessment of the measurement properties of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L using data from the Swedish Amputation and Prosthetics Registry

References

• Davie-Smith F, Coulter E, Kennon B, et al. Factors influencing quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a systematic review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2017;41(6):537–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Van den Heuvel WJA. A systematic literature review of quality of life in lower limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(11):883–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamrad I, Soderberg B, Orneholm H, et al. SwedeAmp-the Swedish amputation and prosthetics registry: 8-year data on 5762 patients with lower limb amputation show sex differences in amputation level and in patient-reported outcome. Acta Orthop. 2020;22:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moxey PW, Gogalniceanu P, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Lower extremity amputations-a review of global variability in incidence. Diabet Med. 2011;28(10):1144–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT I): quality of life and satisfaction are strongly related to mobility for patients with a lower limb prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(5):498–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Netten JJ, Fortington LV, Hinchliffe RJ, et al. Early post-operative mortality after major lower limb amputation: a systematic review of population and regional based studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(2):248–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortington LV, Dijkstra PU, Bosmans JC, et al. Change in health-related quality of life in the first 18 months after lower limb amputation: a prospective, longitudinal study. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(6):587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(14–15):837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJA, Arokiasamy P. Factors affecting quality of life in lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(1):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayakaran P, Perry M, Hale L. Comparison of self-reported physical activity levels and quality of life between individuals with dysvascular and non-dysvascular below-knee amputation: a cross-sectional study. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(2):235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis, and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. Third edition. ed. Chichester, West Sussex (UK); Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–1736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleby J, Devlin NJ, Parkin DW. Using patient reported outcomes to improve health care. Chichester, West Sussex (UK); Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol group: past, present and future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(2):127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennvall GR, Apelqvist J. Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers. J Diabetes Complicat. 2000;14(5):235–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R. Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Medical Decision Making. 2002;22(4):340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes A, Arima H, Woodward M, et al. Changes in quality of life associated with complications of diabetes: results from the ADVANCE study. Value Health. 2016;19(1):36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly DJ, Xie F, Pullenayegum E, et al. Estimation of the impact of diabetes-related complications on health utilities for patients with type 2 diabetes in Ontario, Canada. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(6):939–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sothornwit J, Srisawasdi G, Suwannakin A, et al. Decreased health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot problems. DMSO. 2018;11:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Voko Z, Gaspar K, Inotai A, et al. Osteoporotic fractures may impair life as much as the complications of diabetes. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(6):1375–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangelder MJ, McDonnel J, Van Busschbach JJ, et al. Quality of life after infrainguinal bypass grafting surgery. Dutch bypass oral anticoagulants or aspirin (BOA) study group. J Vasc Surg. 1999;29(5):913–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernstsson O, Janssen MF, Heintz E. Collection and use of EQ-5D for follow-up, decision-making, and quality improvement in health care – the case of the Swedish National Quality Registries. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020;4(1):78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchholz I, Janssen MF, Kohlmann T, et al. A systematic review of studies comparing the measurement properties of the three-level and five-level versions of the EQ-5D. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(6):645–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen MF, Bonsel GJ, Luo N. Is EQ-5D-5L better than EQ-5D-3L? A head-to-Head comparison of descriptive systems and value sets from seven countries. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(6):675–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig BM, Pickard AS, Lubetkin EI. Health problems are more common, but less severe when measured using newer EQ-5D versions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(1):93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafie AA, Vasan Thakumar A, Lim CJ, et al. Psychometric performance assessment of Malay and Malaysian English version of EQ-5D-5L in the Malaysian population. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(1):153–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, et al. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):845–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kim HJ, Lee SI, et al. Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(6):1065–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agborsangaya CB, Lahtinen M, Cooke T, et al. Comparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general population. Health Qual Life Out. 2014;12:74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholz I, Thielker K, Feng YS, et al. Measuring changes in health over time using the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: a head-to-head comparison of measurement properties and sensitivity to change in a German inpatient rehabilitation sample. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(4):829–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia YX, Cui FQ, Li L, et al. Comparison between the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in patients with hepatitis B. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(8):2355–2363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin XJ, Al Sayah F, Ohinmaa A, et al. The EQ-5D-5L is superior to the-3L version in measuring health-related quality of life in patients awaiting THA or TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477(7):1632–1644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner-Spady BL, Marshall DA, Bohm E, et al. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(7):1775–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppe M, Devlin NJ, van Hout B, et al. A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health. 2014;17(4):445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35(11):1095–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS, et al. Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value Health. 2012;15(5):708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Orlandini D, Ferriero G, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the locomotor capabilities index in adults with lower-limb amputation undergoing prosthetic training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):743–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Branemark R, Hagg O. Questionnaire for persons with a transfemoral amputation (Q-TFA): initial validity and reliability of a new outcome measure. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(5):695–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen MF, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Evaluating the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon's indices. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(5):895–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E, Gordon H, Roman J. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ernstsson O, Burstrom K, Heintz E, et al. Reporting and valuing one's own health: a think aloud study using EQ-5D-5L, EQ VAS and a time trade-off question among patients with a chronic condition. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar