Stakeholders’ experience of collaboration in the context of interdisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with chronic pain aiming at return to work

References

• Harker J, Reid KJ, Bekkering GE, et al. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark and Sweden. Pain Res Treat. 2012;2012:371248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):e273–e283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Porteous C, et al. What happens to work if you're unwell? Beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain in a public sector setting. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(1):31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergstrom G, et al. Returning to work – a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Persson E, Stålnacke B, et al. Return to work after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: one- and two-year follow-up based on the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(4):281–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Försäkringskassan; 2020 [updated 2020 Sep 28]. Available from: https://www.forsakringskassan.se/statistik/sjuk/sjuk-och-rehabiliteringspenning
   Google Scholar
• Wiberg M, Friberg E, Palmer E, et al. Sickness absence and subsequent disposable income: a population-based cohort study. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43(4):432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams RM, Westmorland MG, Lin CA, et al. Effectiveness of workplace rehabilitation interventions in the treatment of work-related low back pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(8):607–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Work and Health. Seven ‘Principles’ for successful return to work; 2007. Available from: https://www.iwh.on.ca/sites/iwh/files/iwh/tools/seven_principles_rtw_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015;350:h444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendbekken R, Eriksen HR, Grasdal A, et al. Return to work in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: multidisciplinary intervention versus brief intervention: a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund E, Anderzen I, Andersen A, et al. Multidisciplinary intervention and acceptance and commitment therapy for return-to-work and increased employability among patients with mental illness and/or chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(11):2424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bültmann U, Sherson D, Olsen J, et al. Coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, et al. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HCW, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD006955.
   Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Corbiere M, Coutu MF, et al. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, et al. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekkers-Sánchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, et al. What promotes sustained return to work of employees on long-term sick leave? Perspectives of vocational rehabilitation professionals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(6):481–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):525–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seing I, Stahl C, Nordenfelt L, et al. Policy and practice of work ability: a negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):553–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell E, Kosny A. Communication and collaboration among return-to-work stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(22):2630–2639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsing E, Söderberg E, Berterö C, et al. Primary healthcare professionals' experiences of the sick leave process: a focus group study in Sweden. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):450–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soklaridis S, Ammendolia C, Cassidy D. Looking upstream to understand low back pain and return to work: psychosocial factors as the product of system issues. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9):1557–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axén G. Mer trygghet och bättre försäkring – Parlamentariska socialförsäkringsutredningen SOU 2015:21; 2015. Available from: www.regeringen.se
   Google Scholar
• Lag om koordineringsinsatser för sjukskrivna patienter 2019:1297 (Law on coordination efforts for sick-leave patients). Sveriges riksdag, Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Mandus F. SOU 2020:24 Tillsammans för en välfungerande sjukskrivnings- och rehabiliteringsprocess. In: Socialdepartementet, editor; 2020. Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2020/04/sou-202024/2020
   Google Scholar
• Nastasia I, Coutu MF, Tcaciuc R. Topics and trends in research on non-clinical interventions aimed at preventing prolonged work disability in workers compensated for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs): a systematic, comprehensive literature review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(22):1841–1856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabariego C, Coenen M, Ito E, et al. Effectiveness of integration and re-integration into work strategies for persons with chronic conditions: a systematic review of European strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanholm F, Liedberg GM, Löfgren M, et al. Factors of importance for return to work, experienced by patients with chronic pain that have completed a multimodal rehabilitation program – a focus group study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Socialförsäkringsbalk 2010:110 (Social Insurance Code). Sveriges riksdag, Socialdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Open Code 4.03 Software program. Umeå: Umeå University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand M-J, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–360.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist R. Vocational rehabilitation between work and welfare – the Swedish experience. Scand J Disabil Res. 2003;5(1):68–92.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl C, Mussener U, Svensson T. Implementation of standardized time limits in sickness insurance and return-to-work: experiences of four actors. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1404–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Costa-Black K, Loisel P. Applying theories to better understand socio-political challenges in implementing evidence-based work disability prevention strategies. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(8):952–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck M, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Keisu S, et al. Restoring confidence in return to work: a qualitative study of the experiences of persons with exhaustion disorder after a dialogue-based workplace intervention. PLOS One. 2020;15(7):e0234897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskilsson T, Norlund S, Lehti A, et al. Enhanced capacity to act: managers' perspectives when participating in a dialogue-based workplace intervention for employee return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(2):263–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennehed CP, Holmberg S, Axén I, et al. Early workplace dialogue in physiotherapy practice improved work ability at 1-year follow-up-WorkUp, a randomised controlled trial in primary care. Pain. 2018;159(8):1456–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubertsson J, Petersson IF, Arvidsson B, et al. Sickness absence in musculoskeletal disorders – patients' experiences of interactions with the social insurance agency and health care. A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand MJ, Baril R, et al. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):581–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries HJ, Reneman MF, Groothoff JW, et al. Self-reported work ability and work performance in workers with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, Rees S, Underwood M, et al. Obstacles to returning to work with chronic pain: in-depth interviews with people who are off work due to chronic pain and employers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell O, Johansson SE, Strender LE. Predictors of stable return-to-work in non-acute, non-specific spinal pain: low total prior sick-listing, high self prediction and young age. A two-year prospective cohort study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11(1):53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wåhlin C, Ekberg K, Persson J, et al. Association between clinical and work-related interventions and return-to-work for patients with musculoskeletal or mental disorders. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(4):355–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings EC, van Schalkwyk GI, Grunschel BD, et al. Self-efficacy and paradoxical dependence in chronic back pain: a qualitative analysis. Chronic Illn. 2017;13(4):251–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, et al. Interactions between injured workers and insurers in workers' compensation systems: a systematic review of qualitative research literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):160–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteban E, Coenen M, Ito E, et al. Views and experiences of persons with chronic diseases about strategies that aim to integrate and re-integrate them into work: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toye F, Seers K, Allcock N, et al. A synthesis of qualitative research exploring the barriers to staying in work with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(6):566–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallinen M, Kukkurainen ML, Peltokallio L, et al. Women's narratives on experiences of work ability and functioning in fibromyalgia. Musculoskeletal Care. 2010;8(1):18–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel S, Greasley K, Watson PJ. Barriers to rehabilitation and return to work for unemployed chronic pain patients: a qualitative study. Eur J Pain. 2007;11(8):831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlstrom L, Dellve L, Hagberg M, et al. Women with neck pain on long-term sick leave-approaches used in the return to work process: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):92–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SD, Loiselle CG. Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(2):228–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba YLE. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar