749
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

A systematic review of economic analyses of home-based telerehabilitation

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 8188-8200 | Received 22 Feb 2021, Accepted 10 Dec 2021, Published online: 30 Dec 2021

References

  • Junge T, Knudsen HK, Kristensen HK. The effect of long-term, group-based physical, cognitive and social activities on physical performance in elderly, community-dwelling people with mild to moderate dementia. Dementia. 2020;19(6):1829–1843.
  • Scrutinio D, Giardini A, Chiovato L, et al. The new frontiers of rehabilitation medicine in people with chronic disabling illnesses. Eur J Intern Med. 2019;61:1–8.
  • McColl MA, Gupta S, Smith K, et al. Promoting long-term health among people with spinal cord injury: what’s new? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1520.
  • Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states' obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):163–173.
  • Kamenov K, Mills JA, Chatterji S, et al. Needs and unmet needs for rehabilitation services: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(10):1227–1237.
  • Jesus TS, Landry MD, Hoenig H. Global need for physical rehabilitation: systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study 2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(6):980.
  • Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation: a scientific statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019;140(1):e69–e89.
  • Kairy D, Lehoux P, Vincent C, et al. A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(6):427–447.
  • Shulver W, Killington M, Morris C, et al. 'Well, if the kids can do it, I can do it': older rehabilitation patients' experiences of telerehabilitation. Health Expect. 2017;20(1):120–129.
  • Appleby E, Gill ST, Hayes LK, et al. Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in the management of adults with stroke: a systematic review. PLOS One. 2019;14(11):e0225150.
  • Grona SL, Bath B, Busch A, et al. Use of videoconferencing for physical therapy in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):341–355.
  • Chen Y, Chen Y, Zheng K, et al. A qualitative study on user acceptance of a home-based stroke telerehabilitation system. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020;27(2):81–92.
  • Cranen K, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, et al. Toward patient-centered telerehabilitation design: understanding chronic pain patients’ preferences for web-based exercise telerehabilitation using a discrete choice experiment. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e26.
  • Brown J, Buxton M. The economic perspective. Br Med Bull. 1998;54(4):993–1009.
  • Shiell A, Donaldson C, Mitton C, et al. Health economic evaluation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(2):85–88.
  • Scherrenberg M, Falter M, Dendale P. Cost-effectiveness of cardiac telerehabilitation in coronary artery disease and heart failure patients: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J Digital Health. 2020;1(1):20–29.
  • Salawu A, Green A, Crooks MG, et al. A proposal for multidisciplinary tele-rehabilitation in the assessment and rehabilitation of COVID-19 survivors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4890.
  • Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford (UK); New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2015.
  • Shields GE, Elvidge J. Challenges in synthesising cost-effectiveness estimates. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):289.
  • Bendixen RM, Levy CE, Olive ES, et al. Cost effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program to support chronically ill and disabled elders in their homes. Telemed J E Health. 2009;15(1):31–38.
  • Cheng Q, Church J, Haas M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a population-based lifestyle intervention to promote healthy weight and physical activity in non-attenders of cardiac rehabilitation. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25(3):265–274.
  • Collins A, Burns CL, Ward EC, et al. Home-based telehealth service for swallowing and nutrition management following head and neck cancer treatment. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(10):866–872.
  • Comans T, Mihala G, Sakzewski L, et al. The cost-effectiveness of a web-based multimodal therapy for unilateral cerebral palsy: the MiTii randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(7):756–761.
  • Fatoye F, Gebrye T, Fatoye C, et al. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation for people with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(6):e15375.
  • Frederix I, Solmi F, Piepoli MF, et al. Cardiac telerehabilitation: a novel cost-efficient care delivery strategy that can induce long-term health benefits. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(16):1708–1717.
  • Frederix I, Vandijck D, Hens N, et al. Economic and social impact of increased cardiac rehabilitation uptake and cardiac telerehabilitation in Belgium – a cost–benefit analysis. Acta Cardiol. 2018;73(3):222–229.
  • Fusco F, Turchetti G. Telerehabilitation after total knee replacement in Italy: cost-effectiveness and cost–utility analysis of a mixed telerehabilitation-standard rehabilitation programme compared with usual care. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e009964.
  • Gandolfi M, Geroin C, Dimitrova E, et al. Virtual reality telerehabilitation for postural instability in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:7962826.
  • Hinman RS, Campbell PK, Lawford BJ, et al. Does telephone-delivered exercise advice and support by physiotherapists improve pain and/or function in people with knee osteoarthritis? Telecare randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(13):790–797.
  • Housley SN, Garlow AR, Ducote K, et al. Increasing access to cost effective home-based rehabilitation for rural veteran stroke survivors. Austin J Cerebrovasc Dis Stroke. 2016;3(2):1–11.
  • Hwang R, Morris NR, Mandrusiak A, et al. Cost–utility analysis of home-based telerehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(12):1795–1803.
  • Ihrig C. Travel cost savings and practicality for low-vision telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(7):649–654.
  • Kidholm K, Rasmussen MK, Andreasen JJ, et al. Cost–utility analysis of a cardiac telerehabilitation program: the teledialog project. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(7):553–563.
  • Kloek CJJ, van Dongen JM, de Bakker DH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a blended physiotherapy intervention compared to usual physiotherapy in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1082.
  • Körtke H, Stromeyer H, Zittermann A, et al. New East-Westfalian postoperative therapy concept: a telemedicine guide for the study of ambulatory rehabilitation of patients after cardiac surgery. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(4):475–483.
  • Levy CE, Silverman E, Jia H, et al. Effects of physical therapy delivery via home video telerehabilitation on functional and health-related quality of life outcomes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):361–370.
  • Lloréns R, Noé E, Colomer C, et al. Effectiveness, usability, and cost–benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):418–425.e2.
  • Longacre CF, Nyman JA, Visscher SL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the collaborative care to preserve performance in cancer (COPE) trial tele-rehabilitation interventions for patients with advanced cancers. Cancer Med. 2020;9(8):2723–2731.
  • Maddison R, Rawstorn JC, Stewart RAH, et al. Effects and costs of real-time cardiac telerehabilitation: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Heart. 2019;105(2):122–129.
  • Nelson M, Russell T, Crossley K, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation versus traditional care after total hip replacement: a trial-based economic evaluation. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;27:359–366.
  • Pastora-Bernal JM, Martín-Valero R, Barón-López FJ. Cost analysis of telerehabilitation after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(8):553–559.
  • Prvu Bettger J, Green CL, Holmes DN, et al. Effects of virtual exercise rehabilitation in-home therapy compared with traditional care after total knee arthroplasty: VERITAS, a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg. 2020;102(2):101–109.
  • Saiyed M, Hill AJ, Russell TG, et al. Cost analysis of home telerehabilitation for speech treatment in people with Parkinson's disease. J Telemed Telecare. 2020.
  • Schoenberg MR, Ruwe WD, Dawson K, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes and treatment cost between a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation teletherapy program and a face-to-face rehabilitation program. Profess Psychol Res Pract. 2008;39(2):169–175.
  • Shaw MT, Best P, Frontario A, et al. Telerehabilitation benefits patients with multiple sclerosis in an urban setting. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(1):39–45.
  • Shaw L, Bhattarai N, Cant R, et al. An extended stroke rehabilitation service for people who have had a stroke: the EXTRAS RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(24):1–202.
  • Tindall LR, Huebner RA. The impact of an application of telerehabilitation technology on caregiver burden. Int J Telerehabil. 2009;1(1):3–8.
  • Tousignant M, Moffet H, Nadeau S, et al. Cost analysis of in-home telerehabilitation for post-knee arthroplasty. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(3):e83.
  • Whittaker F, Wade V. The costs and benefits of technology-enabled, home-based cardiac rehabilitation measured in a randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(7):419–422.
  • Yardley L, Barker F, Muller I, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of booklet based vestibular rehabilitation for chronic dizziness in primary care: single blind, parallel group, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e2237.
  • Bell KM, Onyeukwu C, Smith CN, et al. A portable system for remote rehabilitation following a total knee replacement: a pilot randomized controlled clinical study. Sensors. 2020;20(21):6118.
  • Raso MG, Arcuri F, Liperoti S, et al. Telemonitoring of patients with chronic traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:598777.
  • Niewada M, Tabor B, Piotrowicz E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients with heart failure in Poland: an analysis based on the results of telerehabilitation in the heart failure patients (TELEREH-HF) randomized clinical trial. Kardiol Pol. 2021;79(5):510–516.
  • Völter C, Stöckmann C, Schirmer C, et al. Tablet-based telerehabilitation versus conventional face-to-face rehabilitation after cochlear implantation: prospective intervention pilot study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(1):e20405.
  • Yilmaz SK, Horn BP, Fore C, et al. An economic cost analysis of an expanding, multi-state behavioural telehealth intervention. J Telemed Telecare. 2019;25(6):353–364.
  • Snoswell CL, Taylor ML, Comans TA, et al. Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(10):e17298.
  • Whitehead SJ, Ali S. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010;96(1):5–21.
  • Eze ND, Mateus C, Cravo Oliveira Hashiguchi T. Telemedicine in the OECD: an umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation. PLOS One. 2020;15(8):e0237585.
  • Kraal JJ, Van den Akker-Van Marle ME, Abu-Hanna A, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared to conventional, centre-based cardiac rehabilitation: results of the FIT@Home study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(12):1260–1273.
  • Cowie A, Moseley O. Home- versus hospital-based exercise training in heart failure: an economic analysis. Br J Cardiol. 2014;21.
  • Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, Lavis JN, et al. Optimal search strategies for detecting health services research studies in MEDLINE. CMAJ. 2004;171(10):1179–1185.
  • McKinlay RJ, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, et al. Optimal search strategies for detecting cost and economic studies in EMBASE. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):67.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.