Characteristics of peer-based interventions for individuals with neurological conditions: a scoping review

References

• Barclay L, Hilton GM. A scoping review of peer-led interventions following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(8):626–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassaway J, Jones ML, Sweatman WM, et al. Peer-led, transformative learning approaches increase classroom engagement in care self-management classes during inpatient rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42(3):338–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GBD 2015 Neurological Disorders Collaborator Group. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders during 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:877–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp MR, Scarlett LJ, Ruissen GR, et al. Peer mentoring of adults with spinal cord injury: a transformational leadership perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(19):1884–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin H, Hazan J, Wilson P. Self-management for people with long-term neurological conditions. Br J Community Nurs. 2012;17(6):250–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rini C, Lawsin C, Austin J, et al. Peer mentoring and survivors’ stories for cancer patients: positive effects and some cautionary notes. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(1):163–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heisler M. Overview of peer support models to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Diabetes Spectr. 2007;20(4):214–221.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey L, Bigby C. Health education by peers with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2018;30(1):141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Georgiou M. Perceived effectiveness and mechanisms of community peer-based programmes for spinal cord injuries-a systematic review of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(3):225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE. Teaching coping skills enhances quality of life more than peer support: results of a randomized trial with multiple sclerosis patients. Health Psychol. 1999;18(3):211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris RP, Fletcher-Smith JC, Radford KA. A systematic review of peer mentoring interventions for people with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):1030–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy BB, Luong D, Perrier L, et al. Peer support interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramchand R, Ahluwalia SC, Xenakis L, et al. A systematic review of peer-supported interventions for health promotion and disease prevention. Prev Med. 2017;101:156–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungberg I, Kroll T, Libin A, et al. Using peer mentoring for people with spinal cord injury to enhance self-efficacy beliefs and prevent medical complications. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(3–4):351–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabigon RD, Wojciechowski E, Rosen L, et al. Interprofessional collaboration and peer mentors for bowel education in spinal cord injury: a case consultation. Rehabil Nurs J. 2017;44:123–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Neurological conditions in household population [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310046701.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, et al. How common are the “common” neurologic disorders? Neurology. 2007;68(5):326–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzheimer Society of Canada. How relationships change [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 4]. Available from: https://alzheimer.ca/en/Home/Living-with-dementia/Staying-connected/How-relationships-change.
   Google Scholar
• Pillemer K, Suitor JJ. Peer support for alzheimer’s caregivers: is it enough to make a difference? Res Aging. 2002;24(2):171–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharett E, Madathil KC, Lopes S, et al. An investigation of the information sought by caregivers of Alzheimer’s Patients on Online Peer Support Groups. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(10):640–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson DA, Brady E, Yi E-H, et al. Friendsourcing peer support for Alzheimer’s caregivers using facebook social media. J Technol Hum Serv. 2018;36(2-3):105–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software [Internet]; [cited 2019 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.covidence.org.
   Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Trok K, Jorgensen S, et al. Active rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury in Botswana – effects of a community peer-based programme. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(10):897–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassaway J, Jones ML, Sweatman WM, et al. Effects of peer mentoring on self-efficacy and hospital readmission after inpatient rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(8):1526–1534.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann DD, Sundby J, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. Implementing volunteer peer mentoring as a supplement to professional efforts in primary rehabilitation of persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(10):881–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan BV, Brody M, Everhart-Skeels S, et al. Randomized trial of a peer-led, telephone-based empowerment intervention for persons with chronic spinal cord injury improves health Self-Management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1067–1076.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones ML, Gassaway J, Sweatman WM. Peer mentoring reduces unplanned readmissions and improves self-efficacy following inpatient rehabilitation for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;44(3):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Ginis KA, Shaw RB, Stork MJ, et al. Pilot study of a training program to enhance transformational leadership in spinal cord injury peer mentors. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018;4(1):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw RB, Sweet SN, McBride CB, et al. Operationalizing the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the collective impact of autonomous community programs that promote health and well-being. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):803.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shem K, Medel R, Wright J, et al. Return to work and school: a model mentoring program for youth and young adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49(4):544–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffey L, Bigby C. I feel free’: the experience of a peer education program with Fijians with spinal cord injury. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2018;30(2):175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemtob K, Caron JG, Fortier MS, et al. Exploring the peer mentorship experiences of adults with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63(4):542–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Tasiemski T, Augutis M, et al. Active rehabilitation-a community peer-based approach for persons with spinal cord injury: international utilisation of key elements. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(6):545–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainforth H, Giroux E, Shaw R, et al. Investigating characteristics of quality peer mentors with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(10):1916–1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas BM, Price L, Freeman JA. Qualitative evaluation of a community peer support service for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(4):295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houlihan BV, Everhart-Skeels S, Gutnick D, et al. Empowering adults with chronic spinal cord injury to prevent secondary conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1687–1695.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth K, Mueller G, Wyss A. Experiences of peer counselling during inpatient rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injuries. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5:1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skeels SE, Pernigotti D, Houlihan BV, et al. SCI peer health coach influence on self-management with peers: a qualitative analysis. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(11):1016–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veith EM, Sherman JE, Pellino TA, et al. Qualitative analysis of the peer-mentoring relationship among individuals with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2006;51(4):289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines CL. Promoting community reentry: the TIRR PEERS program. Psychosoc Process. 2000;13:185–187.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez B, Hayes E, Balcazar F, et al. Responding to the needs of the underserved: a peer-mentor approach. SCI Psychosoc Process. 2001;14:142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Allin S, Shepherd J, Thorson T, et al. Web-Based health coaching for spinal cord injury: results from a mixed methods feasibility evaluation. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;7(2):e16351.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Balcazar FE, Kelly EH, Keys CB, et al. Using peer mentoring to support the rehabilitation of individuals with violently acquired spinal cord injuries. J Appl Rehabil Couns. 2011;42(4):3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lucke KT, Lucke JF, Martinez H. Evaluation of a professional + peer telephone intervention with spinal cord injured individuals following rehabilitation in South Texas. J Multicult Nurs Health JMCNH. 2004;10:68–74.
   Google Scholar
• Colon-Semenza C, Latham NK, Quintiliani LM, et al. Peer coaching through mHealth targeting physical activity in people with parkinson disease: feasibility study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(2):e42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soundy A, Collett J, Lawrie S, et al. A qualitative study on the impact of first steps-A peer-led educational intervention for people newly diagnosed with parkinson’s disease. Behav Sci Basel Switz. 2019;9(10):107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howell S, Beeke S, Pring T, et al. Measuring outcomes of a peer-led social communication skills intervention for adults with acquired brain injury: a pilot investigation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;31(7):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen MA, Davis LC, Bogaards JA, et al. Making connections after brain injury: development and evaluation of a social peer-mentoring program for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2011;26(1):4–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wobma R, Nijland R, Kwakkel G. Patient characteristics related to the need for peer support in rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e025665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, Cummins C, Kayes N, et al. Making sense of recovery after traumatic brain injury through a peer mentoring intervention: a qualitative exploration. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10):e020672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreci G. A model system of traumatic brain injury peer support importance, development and process. Neurorehabilitation. 1996;7(3):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wobma R, Nijland RH, Ket JC, et al. Evidence for peer support in rehabilitation for individuals with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(10):837–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakmann L, Norup A, Forchhammer BH. Hit in the heart of life: How meeting like-Minded peers may contribute to psychosocial recovery of adolescents and young adults with acquired brain injury. Front Neurol. 2019;10:521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea A, Frawley P, Leahy JW, et al. A critical appraisal of sexuality and relationship programs for people with acquired brain injury. Sex Disabil. 2020;38(1):57–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronish IM, Goldfinger JZ, Negron R, et al. Effect of peer education on stroke prevention: the prevent recurrence of all inner-city strokes through education randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2014;45(11):3330–3336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler D, Egan M, Kubina LA. Peer support for stroke survivors: a case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris R, Morris P. Participants’ experiences of hospital-based peer support groups for stroke patients and carers . Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(4):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijekoon S, Wilson W, Gowan N, et al. Experiences of occupational performance in survivors of stroke attending peer support groups. Can J Occup Ther. 2020;87(3):173–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Behn N, James K, et al. Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: a feasibility randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(8):1151–1163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson-Algar P, Williams S, Burton CR, et al. Getting back to life after stroke: co-designing a peer-led coaching intervention to enable stroke survivors to rebuild a meaningful life after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;42(10):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghani A. A comparative study of the effect of peer-led and lecture-based education on health literacy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2021;9:76–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohr DC, Burke H, Beckner V, et al. A preliminary report on a skills-based telephone-administered peer support programme for patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005;11(2):222–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng L, Amatya B, Khan F. Outcomes of a peer support program in multiple sclerosis in an australian community cohort: a prospective study. J Neurodegener Dis Print. 2013;2013:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Messmer Uccelli M, Mancuso Mohr L, Battaglia MA, et al. Peer support groups in multiple sclerosis: current effectiveness and future directions. Mult Scler. 2004;10(1):80–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz CE, Sendor M. Helping others helps oneself: response shift effects in peer support. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(11):1563–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best KL, Miller WC, Huston G, et al. Pilot study of a Peer-Led wheelchair training program to improve Self-Efficacy using a manual wheelchair: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes R, Fleming P, Henshall L. Peer support groups after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj. 2020;34(7):847–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):464–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham, AL; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology. 2012;38(4):219–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour H, Ramage-Morin PL, Wong SL. Multiple sclerosis: prevalence and impact. Stat Can Health Rep. 2018;29:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Agency of Canada. Stroke in Canada: highlights from the Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System, 2017 [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 4]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/stroke-canada-fact-sheet.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hoddinott P, Chalmers M, Pill R. One-to-One or Group-Based peer support for breastfeeding? Women's perceptions of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention. Birth. 2006;33(2):139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana MJ, Manalili K, Jolley RJ, et al. How to practice person-centred care: a conceptual framework. Health Expect. 2018;21(2):429–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie P. Really putting patients first: ensuring significant involvement for patients in healthcare decision making. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(632):108–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar