Co-creation and stroke rehabilitation: a scoping review

References

• Palmer VJ, Weavell W, Callander R, et al. The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Med Humanit. 2019;45(3):247–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, et al. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogrin R, Dickins M, Johnstone G, et al. Co-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(2):494–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo R. Contextualizing co-production of health care: a systematic literature review. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2016;29(1):72–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco F, Marsilio M, Guglielmetti C. Co-production in health policy and management: a comprehensive bibliometric review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):504–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg W, Bekkers V, Tummers L. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag Rev. 2015;17(9):1333–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler D, Hauteclocque J, Grimes D, et al. Development of the integrated Parkinson's Care Network (IPCN): using co-design to plan collaborative care for people with Parkinson's disease. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(5):1355–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Realpe A, Wallace LM. What is co-production? 2010. Available from: https://improve.bmj.com/sites/default/files/resources/what_is_co-production.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berwick DM. Era 3 for medicine and health care. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;315(13):1329–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke D, Jones F, Harris R, et al. What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(7):e014650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsrud K, Kucharska J, Adlington K, et al. Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature. J Public Health. 2021;43(1):197–208.
   Google Scholar
• Lim S, Morris H, Pizzirani B, et al. Evaluating hospital tools and services that were co-produced with patients: a rapid review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020;32(4):231–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 10 facts on noncommunicable diseases; 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/noncommunicable_diseases/en/
   Google Scholar
• Clark E, Bennett K, Ward N, et al. One size does not fit all – stroke survivor's views on group self-management interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(5):569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béjot Y, Daubail B, Giroud M. Epidemiology of stroke and transient ischemic attacks: current knowledge and perspectives. Rev Neurol. 2016;172(1):59–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabi M, et al. Stroke: a global response is needed. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(9):634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi RV, Moran AE, Feigin VL, et al. Stroke prevalence, mortality and disability-adjusted life years in adults aged 20–64 years in 1990–2013: data from the Global Burden of Disease 2013 Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;45(3):190–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putaala J. Ischemic stroke in young adults. Continuum. 2020;26(2):386–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitehead S, Baalbergen E. Poststroke rehabilitation. S Afr Med J. 2019;109(2):81–83.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Pöstges H, Brimicombe L. Building bridges between healthcare professionals, patients and families: a coproduced and integrated approach to self-management support in stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;39(4):471–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, et al. Self-management support interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic meta-review. PLOS One. 2015;10(7):e0131448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):98–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowdell F, Dyson J, Sykes M, et al. How and how well have older people been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies: a scoping review with narrative summary. Health Soc Care Community. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, et al. Appraising the evidence: reviewing disparate data systematically. Qual Health Res. 2002;12(9):1284–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software; 2021. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. What is the framework for innovation? Design Council's evolved Double Diamond; 2021. Available from: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/what-framework-innovation-design-councils-evolved-double-diamond
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom S, Flink M, Elf M, et al. The manifestation of participation within a co-design process involving patients, significant others and health-care professionals. Health Expect. 2021;24(3):905–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaroodi HM, Adam MTP, Chiong R, et al. Empathic avatars in stroke rehabilitation: a co-designed mHealth artifact for stroke survivors. In: Maedche A, vom Brocke J, Hevner A, editors. Designing the digital transformation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information System and Technology; 2017 May 30–Jun 1; Karlsruhe, Germany. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Balatsoukas P, Porat T, Sassoon I, et al. User involvement in the design of a data-driven self-management decision support tool for stroke survivors. In: Dumnić B, Delimar M, Stefanović C, editors. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Smart Technologies; 2019 Jul 1–4; Novi Sad, Serbia. Red Hook (NY): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2019. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Fernández L, Alava-Menica A, Marti-Carrera J, et al. Patients as co-designers of the STARR system prototype. In: Mayora O, Forti S, editors. Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2019 May 20–23; Trento, Italy. New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery; 2019. p. 422–425.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Gombert K, Honey S, et al. Addressing inactivity after stroke: the Collaborative Rehabilitation in Acute Stroke (CREATE) study. Int J Stroke. 2020;16(6):669–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Gombert-Waldron K, Honey S, et al. Using co-production to increase activity in acute stroke units: the CREATE mixed-methods study. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2020;8(35):1–136.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson S, Nasr N, Parker J, et al. Developing a personalised self-management system for post stroke rehabilitation; utilising a user-centred design methodology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(6):521–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulnik ST, Pöstges H, Townsend R, et al. A gift from experience: co-production and co-design in stroke and self-management. Des Health. 2019;3(1):98–118.
   Google Scholar
• Olafsdottir SA, Jonsdottir H, Magnusson C, et al. Developing ActivABLES for community-dwelling stroke survivors using the medical research council framework for complex interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):463–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porat T, Marshall IJ, Sadler E, et al. Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e030385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns Á, Kelly H, Pitt I. Rating experience of ICT-delivered aphasia rehabilitation: co-design of a feedback questionnaire. Aphasiology. 2020;34(3):319–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr N, Leon B, Mountain G, et al. The experience of living with stroke and using technology: opportunities to engage and co-design with end users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(8):653–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J, Morton S, Hall J, et al. A co-production approach guided by the behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention for reducing sedentary behaviour after stroke. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020;6(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Driver S, McShan E, Swank C, et al. Creating an appropriate adaptation of a healthy lifestyle intervention for people after stroke. Brain Inj. 2020;34(11):1497–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson-Algar P, Williams S, Burton CR, et al. Getting back to life after stroke: co-designing a peer-led coaching intervention to enable stroke survivors to rebuild a meaningful life after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(10):1359–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler E, Sarre S, Tinker A, et al. Developing a novel peer support intervention to promote resilience after stroke. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(5):1590–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epping-Jordan JE, Pruitt SD, Bengoa R, et al. Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(4):299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan H, Wilkinson A, Chen D, et al. Components of community rehabilitation programme for adults with chronic conditions: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;97:114–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier S, Inglis-Jassiem G. Rehabilitation for community-dwelling people with stroke: home or centre based? A systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2010;5(3):178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frolov AA, Kozlovskaya IB, Biryukova EV, et al. Use of robotic devices in post-stroke rehabilitation. Neurosci Behav Phys. 2018;48(9):1053–1066.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Abel KT, Janecek JT, et al. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;123:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber LM, Stein J. The use of robots in stroke rehabilitation: a narrative review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Du M, Zhou L. Use of mobile applications in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(7):489–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beran D, Lazo-Porras M, Cardenas MK, et al. Moving from formative research to co-creation of interventions: insights from a community health system project in Mozambique, Nepal and Peru. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(6):e001183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Owens J, Cribb A. What are the professional, political, and ethical challenges of co-creating health care systems? AMA J Ethics. 2017;19(11):1132–1138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodyear-Smith F, Jackson C, Greenhalgh T. Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar