Consumer involvement in research – parent perceptions of partnership in cerebral palsy research: a qualitative study

References

• Rosenbaum P. Family-centred research: what does it mean and can we do it? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(2):99–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banner D, Bains M, Carroll S, et al. Patient and public engagement in integrated knowledge translation research: are we there yet? Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris C, Shilling V, McHugh C, et al. Why it is crucial to involve families in all stages of childhood disability research. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):769–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Palisano RJ, Graham I. Perspectives and experiences with engaging youth and families in research. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(3):310–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell J, Fudge N, Greenhalgh T. The impact of public involvement in health research: what are we measuring? Why are we measuring it? Should we stop measuring it? Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderst A, Conroy K, Fairbrother G, et al. Engaging consumers in health research: a narrative review. Aust Health Rev. 2020;44(5):806–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs. 2013;32(2):223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore T, Noble-Carr D, McArthur M. Changing things for the better: the use of children and young people's reference groups in social research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2016;19(2):241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHMRC. Statement on consumer and community involvement in health and medical research Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2016. Available from: https://nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/statement-consumer-and-community-involvement-health-and-medical-research.
   Google Scholar
• Gallivan J, Kovacs Burns K, Bellows M, et al. The many faces of patient engagement. J Particip Med. 2012. Available from: https://participatorymedicine.org/journal/evidence/research/2012/12/26/the-many-faces-of-patient-engagement/.
   Google Scholar
• Stallings SC, Boyer AP, Joosten YA, et al. A taxonomy of impacts on clinical and translational research from community stakeholder engagement. Health Expectations. 2019;22(4):731–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton CB, Leese JC, Hoens AM, et al. Framework for advancing the reporting of patient engagement in rheumatology research projects. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19(38).
   Google Scholar
• Smits DW, van Meeteren K, Klem M, et al. Designing a tool to support patient and public involvement in research projects: the involvement matrix. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen S, Doyle-Thomas KAR, Beesley L, et al. How and why should we engage parents as co-researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices. Health Expectations. 2017;20(4):543–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley K. Is it worth doing?' measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2015;1(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staley K. Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research: INVOLVE, National Institute for Health Research; 2009. Available from: https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Involve_Exploring_Impactfinal28.10.09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beighton C, Victor C, Carey IM, et al. I’m sure we made it a better study…’: experiences of adults with intellectual disabilities and parent carers of patient and public involvement in a health research study. J Intellect Disabil. 2019;23(1):78–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daveson BA, de Wolf-Linder S, Witt J, et al. Results of a transparent expert consultation on patient and public involvement in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2015;29(10):939–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodgate RL, Zurba M, Tennent P. Advancing patient engagement: youth and family participation in health research communities of practice. Res Involv Engagem. 2018;4:9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoekstra F, Mrklas KJ, Khan M, et al. A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature. Health Res Policy and Syst. 2020;18(1):51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavens C, Imms C, Drake G, et al. Perspectives of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy about involvement as research partners: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;28:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Morris C, Janssens A, Shilling V, et al. Meaningful health outcomes for paediatric neurodisability: stakeholder prioritisation and appropriateness of patient reported outcome measures. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards V, Wyatt K, Logan S, et al. Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy. Health Expectations. 2011;14(4):429–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen M. People with cerebral palsy and their families as partners in research: International best practice 2017. Available from: https://www.churchilltrust.com.au/project/to-harness-the-expertise-of-international-research-centres-respected-for-their-partnership-with-consumers-and-apply-the-learnings-to-cerebral-palsy-research-in-australia–-canada-usa-netherlands-uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(2):169–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive description. New York: Routledge; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Staniszewska S, Brett J, Simera I, et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ. 2017;358:j3453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz B, Bevan A. Toward more mindful reporting of patient and public involvement in healthcare. Res Involv Engagem. 2021;97(1):61.
   Google Scholar
• Peninsula Cerebra Research Unit PenCRU Childhood Disability Research. What do we mean by research? Available from: http://www.pencru.org/research/whatdowemeanbyresearch/.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Philadelphia: Prentice Hall; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Con A, McGuinness L, et al. Health care communication issues in multiple sclerosis: an interpretive description. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(1):5–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Kirkham SR, O'Flynn-Magee K. The analytic challenge in interpretive description. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Heckert A, Forsythe LP, Carman KL, et al. Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders' perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsythe LP, Frank LB, Workman TA, et al. Patient, caregiver and clinician views on engagement in comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res. 2017;6(3):231–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans BA, Porter A, Snooks H, et al. A co-produced method to involve service users in research: the SUCCESS model. BMC Med Res Method. 2019;19(34).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liabo K, Boddy K, Bortoli S, et al. Public involvement in health research: what does ‘good’ look like in practice? Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jull JE, Davidson L, Dungan R, et al. A review and synthesis of frameworks for engagement in health research to identify concepts of knowledge user engagement. BMC Med Res Method. 2019;19(1):211–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JD, Auerbach AD, Anderson W, et al. Patient stakeholder engagement in research: a narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities. Health Expectations. 2019;22(3):307–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch N, Atherton P, Doyle-Waters MM, et al. Patient-oriented research competencies in health (PORCH) for researchers, patients, healthcare providers, and decision-makers: results of a scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar