2,120
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Physical activity monitoring during hospital stay: a validation study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 449-454 | Received 16 Sep 2021, Accepted 22 Jan 2022, Published online: 17 Feb 2022

References

  • Covinsky KE, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, et al. Loss of independence in activities of daily living in older adults hospitalized with medical illnesses: increased vulnerability with age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(4):451–458.
  • Brown CJ, Redden DT, Flood KL, et al. The underrecognized epidemic of low mobility during hospitalization of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(9):1660–1665.
  • van de Port IG, Valkenet K, Schuurmans M, et al. How to increase activity level in the acute phase after stroke. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(23–24):3574–3578.
  • Pedersen MM, Bodilsen AC, Petersen J, et al. Twenty-four-hour mobility during acute hospitalization in older medical patients. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(3):331–337.
  • Zisberg A, Shadmi E, Gur-Yaish N, et al. Hospital-associated functional decline: the role of hospitalization processes beyond individual risk factors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(1):55–62.
  • Sourdet S, Lafont C, Rolland Y, et al. Preventable iatrogenic disability in elderly patients during hospitalization. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(8):674–681.
  • Kalisch BJ, Landstrom G, Williams RA. Missed nursing care: errors of omission. Nurs Outlook. 2009;57(1):3–9.
  • De Klein K, Valkenet K, Veenhof C. Perspectives of patients and health-care professionals on physical activity of hospitalized patients. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(2):307–314.
  • Valkenet K, Veenhof C. Validity of three accelerometers to investigate lying, sitting, standing and walking. Submitted. 2018.
  • Anderson JL, Green AJ, Yoward LS, et al. Validity and reliability of accelerometry in identification of lying, sitting, standing or purposeful activity in adult hospital inpatients recovering from acute or critical illness: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(2):233–242.
  • Lim SER, Ibrahim K, Sayer AA, et al. Assessment of physical activity of hospitalised older adults: a systematic review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(3):377–386.
  • Valkenet K, Veenhof C. Validity of three accelerometers to investigate lying, sitting, standing and walking. PLOS One. 2019;14(5):e0217545.
  • Sung PS, Lee KJ, Park WH. Coordination of trunk and pelvis in young and elderly individuals during axial trunk rotation. Gait Posture. 2012;36(2):330–331.
  • Swinnen E, Baeyens JP, Pintens S, et al. Walking more slowly than with normal velocity: the influence on trunk and pelvis kinematics in young and older healthy persons. Clin Biomech. 2013;28(7):800–806.
  • Mannini A, Intille SS, Rosenberger M, et al. Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(11):2193–2203.
  • Vooijs M, Alpay LL, Snoeck-Stroband JB, et al. Validity and usability of low-cost accelerometers for internet-based self-monitoring of physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interact J Med Res. 2014;3(4):e14.
  • Gorman E, Hanson HM, Yang PH, et al. Accelerometry analysis of physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults: a systematic review and data analysis. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2014;11:35–49.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
  • Peters DM, Fritz SL, Krotish DE. Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter walk test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013;36(1):24–30.
  • Peel NM, Kuys SS, Klein K. Gait speed as a measure in geriatric assessment in clinical settings: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(1):39–46.
  • Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statist Med. 1998;17(1):101–110.
  • Ghasemi A, Zahediasl S. Normality tests for statistical analysis: a guide for non-statisticians. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;10(2):486–489.
  • Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(5):411–416.
  • Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1986.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310.
  • Giavarina D. Understanding bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med. 2015;25(2):141–151.
  • Svarre FR, Jensen MM, Nielsen J, et al. The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart® HR and StepWatch™ 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9381.
  • Valkenet K, Bor P, van Delft L, et al. Measuring physical activity levels in hospitalized patients: a comparison between behavioural mapping and data from an accelerometer. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(7):1233–1240.
  • Fazio S, Stocking J, Kuhn B, et al. How much do hospitalized adults move? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Appl Nurs Res. 2020;51:151189.
  • de Leeuwerk M, Bor P, van der Ploeg H, et al. The effectiveness of physical activity interventions using activity trackers during or after inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022.
  • Liao JJ. Sample size calculation for an agreement study. Pharm Stat. 2010;9(2):125–132.