UTAUT2-based questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation to Canadian French

References

• Laver KE, Schoene D, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(12):Cd010255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanlon P, Daines L, Campbell C, et al. Telehealth interventions to support self-management of long-term conditions: a systematic metareview of diabetes, heart failure, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan S, Ali S, Bermak A. Recent developments in printing flexible and wearable sensing electronics for healthcare applications. Sensors. 2019;19(5):1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Pavic A, Goodwin VA. Wearable inertial sensors to measure gait and posture characteristic differences in older adult fallers and non-fallers: a scoping review. Gait Posture. 2020;76:110–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gampala S, Vankeshwaram V, Gadula SSP. Is artificial intelligence the new friend for radiologists? A review article. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e11137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munzer BW, Khan MM, Shipman B, et al. Augmented reality in emergency medicine: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(4):e12368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubin O, Alnajjar F, Jishtu N, et al. Exoskeletons with virtual reality, augmented reality, and gamification for stroke patients' rehabilitation: systematic review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;6(2):e12010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lajeunesse V, Vincent C, Routhier F, et al. Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(7):535–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin M, Lettre J, Routhier F, et al. Impacts of robotic arm use on individuals with upper extremity disabilities: a scoping review. Can J Occup Ther. 2018;85(5):397–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, et al. m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(1):212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):241–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MM, Freeman M, Kaye J, et al. A systematic review of clinician and staff views on the acceptability of incorporating remote monitoring technology into primary care. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20(5):428–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadal C, Doherty G, Sas C. Technology acceptability, acceptance and adoption-definitions and measurement. ACM CHI 2019 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2019 May 4–9; Glasgow, Scotland, UK; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Martin N, Jamet É ,Erhel S, et al., editors. From acceptability to acceptance: does experience with the product influence user initial representations? Toronto: HCI International; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Simblett S, Greer B, Matcham F, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of engagement with remote measurement technology for managing health: systematic review and content analysis of findings. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(7):e10480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost H. A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manuf. 2018;22:960–967.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Tarawneh J. Technology acceptance models and adoption of innovations: a literature review. Int J Sci Res. 2019;9:833.
   Google Scholar
• Tarhini A, Arachchilage N, Masa'deh RE, et al. A critical review of theories and models of technology adoption and acceptance in information system research. Int J Technol Diffus. 2015;6:58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly. 2012;36(1):157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares J, Oliveira T. Electronic health record patient portal adoption by health care consumers: an acceptance model and survey. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(3):e49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivumäki T, Pekkarinen S, Lappi M, et al. Consumer adoption of future MyData-based preventive eHealth services: an acceptance model and survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(12):e429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CY, Yang MC. Empirical investigation of factors influencing consumer intention to use an artificial intelligence-powered mobile application for weight loss and health management. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(10):1240–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshlyansky L, Cairns P, Thimbleby H. Validating the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) tool cross-culturally. Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI…But Not as We Know It. Vol. 2; University of Lancaster, United Kingdom. 1531429: BCS Learning & Development Ltd.; 2007. p. 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(Suppl 1):S124–S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17(2):268–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund AM. Measuring usability with the use questionnaire. Usabil Interface. 2001;8(2):3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pagaling GT, Espiritu AI, Dellosa MAA, et al. The practice of teleneurology in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(2):811–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Lin Y, Wei Y, et al. Intervention of WeChat group guidance in rapid rehabilitation after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:8914997.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith-Turchyn J, Adams SC, Sabiston CM. Testing of a self-administered 6-minute walk test using technology: usability, reliability and validity study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(3):e22818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein J, Santo RM, Guillemin F. A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(4):435–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray-Kaeser S, Satink T, Andresen M, et al. European-French cross-cultural adaptation of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire and pretest in French-Speaking Switzerland. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015;35(2):132–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisvert S, Francoeur J, Gallani MC. Cross-Cultural adaptation and reliability of the French-Canadian version of the European heart failure self-care behaviour scale-9. J Nurs Meas. 2019;27(3):458–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar