Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of Duke Activity Status Index in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

References

• Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2021 Report. [cited 2021 Jan 3]. Available from: http://goldcopd.org/
   Google Scholar
• Olopade CO, Beck KC, Viggiano RW, et al. Exercise limitation and pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin V, Saey D, Laviolette L, et al. Exercise capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mechanisms of limitation. COPD: J Chronic Obstruct Pulmonary Dis. 2007;4(3):195–204.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell DE, Aaron S, Bourbeau J, et al. Canadian thoracic society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – 2007 update. Can Respir J. 2007;14(suppl b):5B–32B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in over 16s: diagnosis and management. Pract Nurse. 2018;48(12):2–72. [cited Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG115
   Google Scholar
• Maddocks M, Nolan CM, Man WDC. Simple functional tests in COPD: Stand up and be counted!. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1700104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64(10):651–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter R, Holiday DB, Grothues C, et al. Criterion validity of the Duke Activity Status Index for assessing functional capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2002;22(4):298–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grodin JL, Hammadah M, Fan Y, et al. Prognostic value of estimating functional capacity with the use of the duke activity status index in stable patients with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2015;21(1):44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravani P, Kilb B, Bedi H, et al. The Duke Activity Status Index in patients with chronic kidney disease: a reliability study. CJASN. 2012;7(4):573–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares L dos A, Neto JB, Jardim JR, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of reproducibility of the duke activity status index for COPD patients in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38(6):684–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culver BH, Graham BL, Coates AL, ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Pulmonary Function Laboratories, et al. Recommendations for a standardized pulmonary function report. An Official American Thoracic Society Technical Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care . 2017;196(11):1463–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(24):3186–3191.15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Respir Med. 1991;85:25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akiki Z, Hallit S, Layoun N, et al. Validation of the St George's respiratory questionnaire and risks factors affecting the quality of life of Lebanese COPD and asthma patients. J Asthma. 2019;56(11):1212–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin Bland J, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;327(8476):307–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, et al. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(8):730–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govil N, Parag K, Kumar B, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Duke Activity Status Index in the Hindi language. Ann Card Anaesth. 2020;23(3):315–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vibulchai N, Thanasilp S, Preechawong S, et al. Validation of the Thai version of the Duke Activity Status Index in patients with a previous myocardial infarction. Asian Biomed. 2014;8(5):623–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink G, Moshe S, Goshen J, et al. Functional evaluation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: pulmonary function test versus cardiopulmonary exercise test. J Occup Environ Med. 2002;44(1):54–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meriem M, Cherif J, Toujani S, et al. Sit-to-stand test and 6-min walking test correlation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Med. 2015; 273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’donnell DE, Elbehairy AF, Webb KA, et al. The link between reduced inspiratory capacity and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14:30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar