Normalising interdisciplinary role-based goal setting in inpatient brain injury rehabilitation: reflections and recommendations of clinicians

References

• Ponsford JL, Downing MG, Olver J, et al. Longitudinal follow-up of patients with traumatic brain injury: outcome at two, five, and ten years post-injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(1):64–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Pick A, Nair A, et al. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;22(12):CD004170.
   Google Scholar
• Karol RL. Team models in neurorehabilitation: structure, function, and culture change. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(4):655–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabljevec K, Singh R, Denes Z, et al. Evidence-based position paper on physical and rehabilitation medicine professional practice for adults with acquired brain injury. The European PRM position (UEMS PRM section). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(6):971–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller E, Murray L, Richards L, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and the Stroke Council, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Stroke. 2010;41(10):2402–2448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund JH, Holmstrom IK, Kumlin T, et al. “Same same or different? A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care?”. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Cornwell PL, et al. Qualitative exploration of a client-centered, goal-directed approach to community-based occupational therapy for adults with traumatic brain injury. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63(5):559–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott S, Fleming J, Doig E. Refining a clinical practice framework to engage clients with brain injury in goal setting. Aust Occup Ther J. 2019;66(3):313–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Kuipers P, et al. Goal-directed outpatient rehabilitation following TBI: a pilot study of programme effectiveness and comparison of outcomes in home and day hospital settings. Brain Inj. 2011;25(11):1114–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Rose H, Ashford S, et al. Patient engagement and satisfaction with goal planning: impact on outcome from rehabilitaion. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2015;22(5):210–216.
   Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Fleming J, Shum D, et al. Comparison of individual, group and combined intervention formats in a randomized controlled trial for facilitating goal attainment and improving psychosocial function following acquired brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(2):81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb P, Glueckauf R. The effects of direct involvement in goal setting on rehabilitation outcome for persons with traumatic brain injuries. Rehabil Psychol. 1994;39(3):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Kuipers P, Cornwell P, et al. Development of self-awareness after severe traumatic brain injury through participation in occupation-based rehabilitation: mixed-methods analysis of a case series. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68(5):578–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flashman LA, McAllister TW. Lack of awareness and its impact in traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2002;17(4):285–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ownsworth T, Clare L. The association between awareness deficits and rehabilitation outcome following acquired brain injury. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26(6):783–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox L, Douglas JM. A scoping review of the nature and outcomes of extended rehabilitation programmes after very severe brain injury. Brain Inj. 2018;32(8):1000–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Bill A, et al. Cost efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e010238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccenna L, Knox L, Douglas J. Briefing paper – Slow Stream Rehabilitation: an overview. [Internet]. Victoria: La Trobe University; 2016 [cited 2021 Jun 23]. Available from: https://www.summerfoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/ssr-briefing-paper-7-june-2016-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1):1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Long JC, et al. When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scobbie L, Duncan EAS, Brady MC, et al. Facilitators and “deal breakers”: a mixed methods study investigating implementation of the goal setting action planning (G-AP) framework in community rehabilitation teams. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Weyer RC, Ballinger C, Playford ED. Goal setting in neurological rehabilitation: staff perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(17):1419–1427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queensland Health. Statewide adult brain injury rehabilitation service plan 2016–2026. State of Queensland; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Pick V, Douglas D, New A, et al. Role-based goal planning: a new approach to enhance participation of rehabilitation patients with severe acquired brain injury. JARNA. 2020;23(1):13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Dungey K, Douglas D, Pick V, et al. Role-based goal setting in catastrophically brain injured individuals: a new paradigm. JARNA. 2020;23(1):7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott S, Fleming J, Doig E. Goal setting approaches and principles used in rehabilitation for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic scoping review. Brain Inj. 2015;29(13-14):1515–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polinder S, Haagsma J, van Klaveren D, et al. Health-related quality of life after TBI: a systematic review of study design, instruments, measurement properties, and outcome. Popul Health Metr. 2015;13(4):4–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Rose H, Lakra C, et al. Goal-setting and attainment in prolonged disorders of consciousness – development of a structured approach. Brain Inj. 2020;34(1):78–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rannisto M, Rosti-Otajärvi E, Mäntynen A, et al. The use of goal attainment scaling in neuropsychological rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(21):1984–1991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski J, Richards LG. Reliability and sensitivity to change of goal attainment scaling in occupational therapy nonclassroom educational experiences. Am J Occup Ther. 2015;69(Supplement_2):6912350030p1–6912350030p5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurr B. Usefulness of a key worker system in a hospital-based brain injury rehabilitation setting. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69(3):134–137.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley F, Kielhofner G, Barris R, et al. The role checklist: Development and empirical assessment of reliability. Occup Ther J Res. 1986;6(3):157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford S, Williams H, Nair A, et al. Categorisation of goals set using goal attainment scaling for treatment of leg spasticity: a multicentre analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(16):1925–1930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. 4th ed. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of normalisation process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–554.
   Google Scholar
• Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8(63):63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneheim U, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday RC, Cano S, Freeman JA, et al. Should patients participate in clinical decision making? An optimised balance block design controlled study of goal setting in a rehabilitation unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(6):576–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, et al. Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(2):159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessup RL, Osborne RH, Buchbinder R, et al. Using co-design to develop interventions to address health literacy needs in a hospitalised population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):989.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DiazGranados D, Dow AW, Appelbaum N, et al. Interprofessional practice in different patient care settings: a qualitative exploration. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(2):151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein G, Feltovich PJ, Bradshaw JM, et al. Common ground and coordination in joint activity. New York: Wiley; 2004. Chapter 6, Organizational Simulation; p. 139–184.
   Google Scholar
• Kabo FW, Cotton-Nessler N, Hwang Y, et al. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Res Policy. 2014;43(9):1469–1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant SE, Tyson SF, Kirk S, et al. What are the barriers and facilitators to goal-setting during rehabilitation for stroke and other acquired brain injuries? A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(9):921–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt AW, Le Dorze G, Trentham B, et al. Elucidating a Goal-Setting continuum in brain injury rehabilitation. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(8):1044–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk TJ, Sherman RE. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs. Commun Ment Health J. 1968;4(6):443–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, Ponsford J. Goal attainment scaling in brain injury rehabilitation: strengths, limitations and recommendations for future applications. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(5):661–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, et al. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar