Needs and wishes for the future lower limb exoskeleton: an interview study among people with spinal cord injury with community-based exoskeleton experience

References

• Nas K, Yazmalar L, Şah V, et al. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World J Orthop. 2015;6(1):8–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, et al. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47-62.
   Google Scholar
• Kay ED, Deutsch A, Wuermser LA. Predicting walking at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation after a traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(6):745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MP, Truitt AR, Schomer KG, et al. Frequency and age effects of secondary health conditions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(12):882–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaansen JJE, Ruijs LEM, van Koppenhagen CF, et al. Secondary health conditions and quality of life in persons living with spinal cord injury for at least ten years. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(10):853–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi D, Zhang W, Zhang W, et al. A review on lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots. Chinese J Mech Eng. 2019;32(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajeunesse V, Vincent C, Routhier F, et al. Exoskeletons’ design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;3107:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Baunsgaard C, Nissen U, Brust A, et al. Exoskeleton gait training after spinal cord injury: an exploratory study on secondary health conditions. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(9):806–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LE, Zimmermann AK, Herbert WG. Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis. MDER. 2016;22:455–466.
   Google Scholar
• Chun A, Asselin PK, Knezevic S, et al. Changes in bowel function following exoskeletal-assisted walking in persons with spinal cord injury: an observational pilot study. Spinal Cord. 2020;58(4):459–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill A, Ginley OM, Bertrand C, et al. Gym-based exoskeleton walking: a preliminary exploration of non-ambulatory end-user perspectives. Disabil Health J. 2018;11(3):478–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijsseldonk RB, van Nes IJW, Geurts ACH, et al. Exoskeleton home and community use in people with complete spinal cord injury. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgey AS. Robotic exoskeletons: the current pros and cons. World J Orthop. 2018;9(9):112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandilakis C, Sasso-Lance E. Exoskeletons for personal use after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021;102(2):331–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palermo AE, Maher JL, Baunsgaard CB, et al. Clinician-focused overview of bionic exoskeleton use after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017;23(3):234–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, et al. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on a proposed combined exoskeleton-wheelchair technology. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2014;11:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajeunesse V, Routhier F, Vincent C, et al. Perspectives of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury concerning the usability of lower limb exoskeletons: an exploratory study. TAD. 2018;30(1–2):63–76.
   Google Scholar
• van Silfhout L, Hosman AJF, van de Meent H, et al. Design recommendations for exoskeletons: perspectives of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021. DOI:10.1080/10790268.2021.1926177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz H, Patzer D, Galen SS. Robotic exoskeletons for reengaging in everyday activities: promises, pitfalls, and opportunities. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(5):560–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, et al. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(12):2954–2965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner DW. Qualitative interview design: a practical guide for novice investigators. Qual Rep. 2010;15:754–760.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijsseldonk RB, Rijken H, van Nes IJW, et al. A framework for measuring the progress in exoskeleton skills in people with complete spinal cord injury. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:699–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Qualitative research in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett AG. Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: a researcher's experience. Contemp Nurse. 2005;19(1–2):75–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalu FA, Bwalya JC. What makes qualitative research good research? An exploratory analysis of critical elements. IJSSR. 2017;5(2):43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. TAD. 2002;14(3):101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Boeije H. Analysis in qualitative research. Boom Lemma; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kolakowsky-Hayner SA. Safety and feasibility of using the Ekso™ bionic exoskeleton to aid ambulation after spinal cord injury. J Spine. 2013;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon DH, Escalona MJ, Vermette M, et al. Locomotor training using an overground robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with a chronic spinal cord injury living in the community: lessons learned from a feasibility study in terms of recruitment, attendance, learnability, performa. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2018;15:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou C. Becoming en-wheeled: the situated accomplishment of re-embodiment as a wheelchair user after spinal cord injury. Disabil Soc. 2008;23(7):691–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monforte J, Smith B, Pérez-Samaniego V. ‘It's not a part of me, but it is what it is’: the struggle of becoming en-wheeled after spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(17):2447–2453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(1):73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmücke D, et al. Against the odds: what to expect in rehabilitation of chronic spinal cord injury with a neurologically controlled hybrid assistive limb exoskeleton. A subgroup analysis of 55 patients according to age and lesion level. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AS, Livingstone DC, Hurd CL, et al. Retraining walking over ground in a powered exoskeleton after spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study to examine functional gains and neuroplasticity. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2019;16:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota S, Nakata Y, Eguchi K, et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(6):1080–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baunsgaard CB, Nissen UV, Brust AK, et al. Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso bionics article. Spinal Cord. 2017;56:106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Ekso™ and Ekso GT™ – K143690; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. Indego® – K173530; 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 10]. p. 1–12. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf17/K173530.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. ReWalk™ P6.0 – K200032; 2020. p. 1–6
   Google Scholar