Families’ and professionals’ perspectives of building and maintaining engagement in telepractice early intervention for young children with communication disability

References

• Hebbeler K, Spiker D, Bailey D, International S, et al. Early intervention for infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families: Participants, services, and outcomes. Final report of the national early intervention longitudinal study (NEILS). Menlo Park, CA; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Law J, Garrett Z, Nye C. The efficacy of treatment for children with developmental speech and language delay/disorder: a meta-analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;47(4):924–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavidia-Payne S, Meddis K, Mahar N. Correlates of child and family outcomes in an australian community-based early childhood intervention program. J Intellect Develop Disab. 2015;40(1):57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government. National disability insurance scheme act. Canberra: Social Services, Treasury; 2013. (Compilation No. 15).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Education. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, PL 108-446, 20 U.S.C §§ 1400 et seq. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Britto PR, Lye SJ, Proulx K, Early Childhood Development Interventions Review Group, for the Lancet Early Childhood Development Series Steering Committee, et al. Nurturing care: Promoting early childhood development. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):91–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle PL, Fernald LCH, Alderman H, et al. Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and Middle-income countries. The Lancet. 2011;378(9799):1339–1353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cason J, Behl D, Ringwalt S. Overview of states' use of telehealth for the delivery of early intervention (IDEA part C) services. Int J Telerehabil. 2012;4(2):39–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai FYX, Serraglio C, Martin JA. Examining potential barriers to early intervention access in australian hearing impaired children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;78(3):507–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole B, Pickard K, Stredler-Brown A. Report on the use of telehealth in early intervention in Colorado: Strengths and challenges with telehealth as a service delivery method. Int J Telerehabil. 2019;11(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Owolabi MO, Amatya B, et al. Challenges and barriers for implementation of the world health organization global disability action plan in low- and middle- income countries . J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(4):367–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arefadib N, Moore TG. Reporting the health and development of children in rural and remote Australia. Victoria: The Centre for Community Child Health at the Royal Children’s Hospital and the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinescu G, Waite M, Dornan D, et al. A pilot study of telepractice delivery for teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing loss. J Telemed Telecare. 2014;20(3):135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll B, Wainer A, Berger N, et al. Comparison of a self-directed and therapist-assisted telehealth parent-mediated intervention for children with ASD: a pilot RCT. J Autism Dev Disord. 2016;46(7):2275–2284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. The treatment efficacy of multiple opposition phonological approach via telepractice for two children with severe phonological disorders in rural areas of west Texas in the USA. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2018;34(1):63–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen D. Parents, families, and partnerships: Issues and considerations. Inter J Disab Develop Educ Parent Family Professional Relation. 2007;54(3):339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Division for Early Childhood. DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey I, Keen D. A review of processes and outcomes in family-centered services for children with a disability. Topics Early Childhood Spec Educ. 2008;28(1):42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melvin K, Meyer C, Scarinci N. What does “engagement” mean in early speech pathology intervention? A qualitative systematised review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(18):2665–2678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stredler-Brown A. Examination of coaching behaviors used by providers when delivering early intervention via telehealth to families of children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Perspect ASHA Sigs. 2017;2(9):25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert KD, Kohnert K. Common factors in speech-language treatment: an exploratory study of effective clinicians. J Commun Disord. 2010;43(2):133–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert KD. Parent perspectives on the clinician-client relationship in speech-language treatment for children. J Commun Disord. 2018;73:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Levickis P, Rodríguez-Ortiz IR, et al. Working with the parents and families of children with developmental language disorders: an international perspective. J Commun Disord. 2019;82:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis ML, Weiss B, Han S, et al. The influence of parental factors on therapist adherence in multi-systemic therapy. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010;38(6):857–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Arrigo R, Copley JA, Poulsen AA, et al. Parent engagement and disengagement in paediatric settings: an occupational therapy perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(20):2882–2893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaiser KM, Behl D, Callow-Heusser C, et al. Measuring costs and outcomes of tele-intervention when serving families of children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing. Int J Telerehabil. 2013;5(2):3–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akamoglu Y, Meadan H, Pearson JN, et al. Getting connected: Speech and language pathologists’ perceptions of building rapport via telepractice. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2018;30(4):569–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HW, Burke M, Isaacs S, et al. Family perspectives toward using telehealth in early intervention. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2021;33(2):197–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retamal-Walter F, Waite M, Scarinci N. Exploring engagement in telepractice early intervention for young children with communication disabilities and their families: a qualitative systematic review. Disabil Rehabil: Assist. Technol. 2022. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2022.2048098
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy M, Leigh G, Arthur-Kelly M. Comparison of caregiver engagement in telepractice and in-person family-centered early intervention. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020;25(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy M, Leigh G, Arthur-Kelly M. Practitioners' self-assessment of family-centered practice in telepractice versus in-person early intervention. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2021;26(1):46–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines M, Lincoln M, Ramsden R, et al. Speech pathologists' perspectives on transitioning to telepractice: What factors promote acceptance? J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(8):469–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freckmann A, Hines M, Lincoln M. Clinicians' perspectives of therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and telepractice speech-language pathology sessions. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017;19(3):287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. Health Environ Res Design J. 2016;9(4):16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33(1):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. New York (NY): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pessoa ASG, Harper E, Santos IS, et al. Using reflexive interviewing to foster deep understanding of research participants’ perspectives. Int J Qual Methods. 2019;18:160940691882502–160940691882509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retamal-Walter F, Waite M, Scarinci N. Identifying critical behaviours for building engagement in telepractice early intervention: An international e-Delphi study. Int J Lang Commun Disor. DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.12714
   Google Scholar
• Melvin K, Meyer C, Scarinci N. Exploring the complexity of how families are engaged in early speech-language pathology intervention using video-reflexive ethnography. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021;56(2):360–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts Pappas N, McAllister L, McLeod S. Parental beliefs and experiences regarding involvement in intervention for their child with speech sound disorder. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2016;32(2):223–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies KE, Marshall J, Brown LJ, et al. Co-working: Parents’ conception of roles in supporting their children’s speech and language development. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2017;33(2):171–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behl DD, Blaiser K, Cook G, et al. A multisite study evaluating the benefits of early intervention via telepractice. Infants Young Children. 2017;30(2):147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman AC, Demers L, Crossman MK, et al. Part C early intervention dosage and growth in adaptive skills from early childhood through adolescence. Early Childhood Res Q. 2018;43:73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamren K, Quigley S. Implementing coaching in a natural environment through distance technologies. Volta Rev. 2012;112(3):403–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King A, Hoppe RB. "Best practice" for patient-centered communication: a narrative review” . J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(3):385–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barr C. Getting ready to be a patient- and family-centered clinician. In: Meyer C, Scarinci N, Hickson L, editors. Patient and Family-Centered Speech-Language pathology and audiology. New York: Thieme; 2019. p. 22–43.
   Google Scholar
• McBride BA, Curtiss SJ, Uchima K, et al. Father involvement in early intervention: Exploring the gap between service providers’ perceptions and practices. J Early Interv. 2017;39(2):71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar