Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with stroke

References

• Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, et al. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. 1999;30(7):1362–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure, and the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke. 2004;35(4):918–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JG, Young NL. A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(3):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care. 1990;28(7):632–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Thompson AJ. Effect sizes can be misleading: is it time to change the way we measure change? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(9):1044–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KL, Chen CT, Chou YT, et al. Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale more responsive than the short form in patients with stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(5):941–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KL, Chou YT, Yu WH, et al. A prospective study of the responsiveness of the original and the short form berg balance scale in people with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(5):468–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100(8):526–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, et al. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel Index, and 10 item Barthel Index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(2):188–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(8):703–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakheit A, Harries SR, Hull RG. Validity of a self-administered version of the Barthel Index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rehabil. 1995;9(3):234–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kucukdeveci AA, Yavuzer G, Tennant A, et al. Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey. Scand J Rehabil Med. 2000;32(2):87–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang CM, Wang YC, Lee CH, et al. A comparison of test-retest reliability and random measurement error of the Barthel Index and modified Barthel Index in patients with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;9:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hocking C, Williams M, Broad J, et al. Sensitivity of Shah, Vanclay and Cooper's modified Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(2):141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Muncer S. Sensitivity of Shah, Vanclay and Cooper's modified Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(5):551–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP Jr., Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Freeman EJ, et al. Interrater reliability of the national institutes of health stroke scale: rating by neurologists and nurses in a community-based stroke incidence study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9(6):323–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LB, Samsa GP. Reliability of the national institutes of health stroke scale. Extension to non-neurologists in the context of a clinical trial. Stroke. 1997;28(2):307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandieh A, Kahaki ZZ, Sadeghian H, et al. The underlying factor structure of national institutes of health stroke scale: an exploratory factor analysis. Int J Neurosci. 2012;122(3):140–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming TB, Churilov L, Linden T, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination are both valid cognitive tools in stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128(2):122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27(3 Suppl):S178–S179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39(11):897–906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat. 1979;7(1):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corp I. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 22.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Wang WC, Sheu CF, et al. Rasch analysis of combining two indices to assess comprehensive ADL function in stroke patients. Stroke. 2004;35(3):721–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, O'Connor RJ, Thompson AJ, et al. Exploring disability rating scale responsiveness II: do more response options help? Neurology. 2006;67(11):2056–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Chen KL, Chou YT, et al. Individual-level responsiveness of the original and short-form postural assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 2013;93(10):1377–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar