Change in care hours, cost, and functional independence following continence and assistive technology intervention in an acquired brain injury population

References

• Kawanabe E, Suzuki M, Tanaka S, et al. Impairment in toileting behavior after a stroke: Impairment in toileting behavior. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(8):1166–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Hilz M-J, Neundoerfer B, et al. Impact of urinary incontinence after stroke: results from a prospective population-based stroke register. Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(4):322–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Coshall C, Lawrence E, et al. Recovery from poststroke urinary incontinence: associated factors and impact on outcome. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(9):1229–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua K, Chuo A, Kong KH. Urinary incontinence after traumatic brain injury: incidence, outcomes and correlates. Brain Injury. 2003;17(6):469–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer JA, Naughton BJ, Dunlop DD, et al. Predicting stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcome using a classification tree approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(6):619–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Hahn M, Dromerick A. Post stroke urinary loss, incontinence and life satisfaction: when does post-stroke urinary loss become incontinence? Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(1):39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebner RA, Johnson K, Bennett CM, et al. Community participation and quality of life outcomes after adult traumatic brain injury. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(2):177–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokler PJ, Sandstrom R, Griffin M, et al. Predicting discharge destination for patients with severe motor stroke: important functional tasks. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;14(3):181–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John G, Primmaz S, Crichton S, et al. Urinary incontinence and indwelling urinary catheters as predictors of death after new-onset stroke: a report of the South London Stroke Register. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(1):118–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John G, Bardini C, Mégevand P, et al. Urinary incontinence as a predictor of death after new-onset stroke: a meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(10):1548–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain KR, Perry SI, Peet SM, et al. Prevalence and impact of urinary symptoms among Community-Dwelling stroke survivors. Stroke. 2000;31(4):886–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MD, McKevitt C, Lawrence E, et al. Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke. Age Ageing. 2007;36(3):316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limampai P, Wongsrithep W, Kuptniratsaikul V. Depression after stroke at 12-month follow-up: a multicenter study. Int J Neurosci. 2017;127(10):887–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J, Rugg S. The importance of independence in toileting: the views of stroke survivors and their occupational therapists. Br J Occup Ther. 2005;68(4):165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Talley KMC, Wyman JF, Bronas UG, et al. Factors associated with toileting disability in older adults without dementia living in residential care facilities. Nurs Res. 2014;63(2):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottenden A, Bliss, DZ, Buckley B, et al. Management using continence products. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Arnhem (The Netherlands): European Association of Urology; 2013. p. 1651-1786.
   Google Scholar
• Yachnin D, Gharib G, Jutai J, et al. Technology-assisted toilets: improving independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017;4:2055668317725686.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler M, Mayer H, Kesselring J, et al. (Can) not talk about it – urinary incontinence from the point of view of stroke survivors: a qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(1):371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barer DH. Continence after stroke: Useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Ageing. 1989;18(3):183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yachnin D, Finestone H, Chin A, et al. Can technology-assisted toilets improve hygiene and independence in geriatric rehabilitation? A cohort study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):626–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung J, Jones A, Jhangri GS, et al. Toileting disability in older people residing in long-term care or assisted living facilities: a scoping review of the literature. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2019;46(5):424–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindén A, Lexell J, Lund ML. Improvements of task performance in daily life after acquired brain injury using commonly available everyday technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):214–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Lane JP. Assessing consumer profiles of ‘ideal’ assistive technologies in ten categories: an integration of quantitative and qualitative methods. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(12):528–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawton MP, Nahemow L. Ecology and the aging process. In: Eisdorfer C, Lawton MP, editors. The psychology of adult development and aging. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1973. p. 619–674.
   Google Scholar
• Charters E, Gillett L, Simpson G. Efficacy of electronic portable assistive devices for people with acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(1):82–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Jensen MP, Søberg MS, et al. Information and communication technology-based assistive technology to compensate for impaired cognition in everyday life: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:810–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madara Marasinghe K. Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agree EM, Freedman VA, Cornman JC, et al. Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: when does assistive technology take the place of personal care? The journals of gerontology. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005;60(5):S272–S280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich R, Caracciolo A. Analysing the cost of individual assistive technology programmes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(4):207–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, et al. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(8):701–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Tonge P, Nyein K, et al. The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS): a measure of nursing dependency in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12(4):304–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K. The Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment (NPCNA): a directly costable outcome measure in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(3):253–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Paul S, Williams H. Efficiency of specialist rehabilitation in reducing dependency and costs of continuing care for adults with complex acquired brain injuries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(5):634–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government, NHaMRC, Australian Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research 2007 (updated 2018). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mann G, Troeung L, Wagland J, et al. Cohort profile: the acquired brain injury community REhabilitation and support services OuTcomes CohoRT (ABI-RESTaRT), Western Australia, 1991–2020. BMJ Open. 2021;11(9):e052728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre. AROC impairment coding guidelines; 2013. Available from: https://documents.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@chsd/@aroc/documents/doc/uow125260.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams H, Harris R, Turner‐Stokes L. Northwick park care needs assessment: adaptation for inpatient neurological rehabilitation settings. J Adv Nurs. 2007;59(6):612–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency, NDIS Price Guide: ACT/NT/SA/WA; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert RJ, Turner-Stokes L. Psychometric evaluation of the Northwick Park Dependency Scale. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(10):936–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Nyein K, Turner-Stokes T, et al. The UK FIM + FAM: development and evaluation. Clin Rehabil. 1999;13(4):277–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Siegert RJ. A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1885–1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Fielding B, Jackson D, et al. The UK FIM + FAM extended activities of daily living module: evaluation of scoring accuracy and reliability. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(10):825–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 16. College Station (TX): StataCorp LLC; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York (NY): Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Erceg-Hurn DM, Mirosevich VM. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. Am Psychol. 2008;63(7):591–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Statist. 1979;7(1):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Dzingina M, Shavelle R, et al. Estimated life-time savings in the cost of ongoing care following specialist rehabilitation for severe traumatic brain injury in the United Kingdom. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2019;34(4):205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris AR, Ho MT, Lapsley H, et al. Costs of managing urinary and faecal incontinence in a Sub-acute care facility: a “bottom-up” approach. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(1):56–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG, et al. Natural history and effects on 2-year outcomes of urinary incontinence after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(1):122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar