References
- Langton AJ, Ramseur H. Enhancing employment outcomes through job accommodation and assistive technology resources and services. J Vocat Rehabil. 2001;16(1):27–37.
- Lamichhane K, Sawada Y. Disability and returns to education in a developing country. Econ Educ Rev. 2013;37:85–94.
- Johnson KL, Dudgeon B, Kuehn C, et al. Assistive technology use among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(2):330–336.
- Veehof M, Taal E, Rasker J, et al. Possession of assistive devices is related to improved psychological well-being in patients with rheumatic conditions [periodical]. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(8):1679–1683.
- Department of Field Support: Geospatial Information Section, cartographer. CRPD and optional protocol signatures and ratifications. Geneva: United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs; 2017. Map No. 4496 Rev 8.
- United Nations. Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities United Nations; 2006. Available from: https://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf
- Tebbutt E, Brodmann R, Borg J, et al. Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Global Health. 2016;12(1):79.
- National Planning Commission. Nepal’s sustainable development goals: Status and roadmap 2016-2030. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2017.
- The Act Relating to Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2074 (2017); c.9.2, 2017. Available from: https://www.lawcommission.gov.np/en/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/The-Act-Relating-to-Rights-of-Persons-with-Disabilities-2074-2017.pdf
- Regmi K, Naidoo J, Pilkington PA, et al. Decentralization and district health services in Nepal: understanding the views of service users and service providers. J Public Health. 2010;32(3):406–417.
- Paudel YR, Dariang M, Keeling SJ, et al. Addressing the needs of people with disability in Nepal: the urgent need. Disabil Health J. 2016;9(2):186–188.
- Karki J, Rushton S, Bhattarai S, et al. Access to assistive technology for persons with disabilities: a critical review from Nepal, India and Bangladesh. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2021.1892843
- Central Bureau of Statistics. National population and housing census 2011 national report. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2012.
- Paudel R, Upadhyaya T, Pahari DP. People’s perspective on access to health care services in a rural district of Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2012;52(185):20–24.
- World Bank and World Health Organisation. World report on disability; 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability
- United Nations Field Office. District profile: Kalikot. Dadeldhura, Nepal: United Nations Resident Coordinator/Humanitarian Coordinator's Office (UNRCHCO); 2013.
- National Planning Commission. Nepal human development report 2014: beyond geography, unlocking human potential. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2014.
- Nepalgunj Medical College. Physical rehabilitation centre (presentation). Kohalpur: Nepalgunj Medical College; 2017.
- World Health Organisation Priority Assistive Product List. Geneva; 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/priority-assistive-products-list
- Ministry of Health & Population. Priority assistive product list of Nepal: improving access to assistive technology for people of Nepal. Kathmandu: Government of Nepal; 2018.
- Pryor W, Nguyen L, Islam QN, et al. Unmet needs and use of assistive products in two districts of Bangladesh: findings from a household survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2901–2913.
- Boggs D, Polack S, Kuper H, et al. Shifting the focus to functioning: essential for achieving sustainable development goal 3, inclusive universal health coverage and supporting COVID-19 survivors. Glob Health Action. 2021;14(1):1903214.
- Naidoo U, Ennion L. Barriers and facilitators to utilisation of rehabilitation services amongst persons with lower-limb amputations in a rural community in South Africa. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(1):95–103.
- Bright T, Wallace S, Kuper H. A systematic review of access to rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2165–2198.
- Ikeda AJ, Grabowski AM, Lindsley A, et al. A scoping literature review of the provision of orthoses and prostheses in resource-limited environments 2000-2010. Part one: considerations for success. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38(4):269–286.
- Bart J, Por I, Maryam B, et al. Addressing access barriers to health services: an analytical framework for selecting appropriate interventions in low-income Asian countries. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(4):288–300.
- Nepal. The Victoria Hand Project website [cited 2020 Jun 20]. Available from: https://www.victoriahandproject.com/nepal.
- Agee J. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 2009;22(4):431–447.
- Kam S, Kent M, Khodaverdian A, et al. The influence of environmental and personal factors on participation of lower-limb prosthetic users in low-income countries: prosthetists’ perspectives. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(3):245–251.
- Ennion L, Johannesson A. A qualitative study of the challenges of providing pre-prosthetic rehabilitation in rural South Africa. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(2):179–186.
- World Health Organisation & USAID. Joint position paper on the provision of mobility devices in less-resourced settings. Geneva; 2011. Available from: https://www.who.int/disabilities/publications/technology/jpp_final.pdf.
- Van Hees S, Cornielje H, Wagle P, et al. Disability inclusion in primary health care in Nepal: an explorative study of perceived barriers to access governmental health services. DCID. 2015;25(4):99–118.
- Amogh B. Primary care in a rural set up in Nepal: perspectives of a generalist. J Fam Med Primary Care. 2013;2(3):218–221.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). Standards for prosthetics and orthotics: part 1, standards. Geneva: WHO; 2017. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259209/9789241512480-part1-eng.pdf;sequence=1.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). Global call for measuring access to assistive technology using the WHO rapid Assistive Technology Assessment (rATA) questionnaire. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/global-call-for-measuring-access-to-assistive-technology-using-the-who-rapid-assistive-technology-assessment-%28rata%29.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). Improving access to assistive technology. World Health Assembly 71.8: Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA71/A71_21-en.pdf.
- Cieza A. Strengthening rehabilitation in a changing world. Paper presented at: ISPO 18th World Congress – Digital Transformation in an Evolving World; 2021.
- Bhattacharyya O, Khor S, McGahan A, et al. Innovative health service delivery models in low and middle income countries - what can we learn from the private sector? Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:24.
- Girdwood S, Govender K, Long L, et al. Primary healthcare delivery models for uninsured low-income earners during the transition to National Health Insurance: perspectives of private South African providers. S Afr Med J. 2019;109(10):771–783.
- Hartley S, Finkenflugel H, Kuipers P, et al. Community-based rehabilitation: opportunity and challenge. Lancet. 2009;374(9704):1803–1804.
- Borg J, Östergren P-O. Users’ perspectives on the provision of assistive technologies in Bangladesh: awareness, providers, costs and barriers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):301–308.
- Borg J, Lindström A, Larsson S. Assistive technology in developing countries: a review from the perspective of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011;35(1):20–29.
- Parajuli R, Doneys P. Exploring the role of telemedicine in improving access to healthcare services by women and girls in rural Nepal. Telematics Informatics. 2017;34(7):1166–1176.
- Khatri RB, Mishra SR, Khanal V. Female community health volunteers in community-based health programs of Nepal: future perspective. Front Public Health. 2017;5:181.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). Standards from prosthetics and orthotics: part 2, implementation. Geneva: WHO; 2017. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259209/9789241512480-part2-eng.pdf?sequence=2.
- International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics & World Health Organisation. The relationship between prosthetics and orthotics services and community-based rehabilitation: a joint ISPO/WHO statement revised December 2003. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(1):3–8.
- O’Dowd J, MacLachlan M, Khasnabis C, et al. Towards a core set of clinical skills for health-related community based rehabilitation in low and Middle income countries. DCID. 2015;26(3):5–43.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO basic rehabilitation package. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: http://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/documents/health-topics/rehabilitation/basic-rehabilitation-package-information-sheet.pdf?sfvrsn=acd43a7b_3.
- De Witt Jansen B, Brazil K, Passmore P, et al. Evaluation of the impact of telementoring using ECHO© technology on healthcare professionals’ knowledge and self-efficacy in assessing and managing pain for people with advanced dementia nearing the end of life . BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):228.
- Arora S, Kalishman SG, Thornton KA, et al. Project ECHO: a telementoring network model for continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2017;37(4):239–244.
- Sam M, Hansen AH, Childress DS. Characterisation of prosthetic feet used in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(2):132–140.
- Motivation Australia. Pacific Wayfinders mentoring programme; 2021. Available from: http://www.motivation.org.au/learning/pacific-wayfinders-mentoring-programme/
- Zhou C, Crawford A, Serhal E, et al. The impact of project ECHO on participant and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2016;91(10):1439–1461.
- Jensen JS, Heim S. Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans-tibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24(1):47–54.
- Jensen JS, Craig JG, Mtalo LB, et al. Clinical field follow-up of high density polyethylene (HDPE)-Jaipur prosthetic technology for trans-femoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(2):152–166.
- Wu Y, Casanova H, Ikeda A. Plastic soda bottles: a reusable material for making transradial sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(2):100–106.
- Jensen JS, Nilsen R, Zeffer J, et al. Clinical field testing of vulcanized rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in tropical low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006;30(2):195–212.
- Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-femoral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2003;27(1):55–62.
- Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field testing of trans-femoral prosthetic technologies: resin-wood and ICRC-polypropylene. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28(2):141–151.
- Jensen JS, Raab W. Clinical field testing of vulcanized Jaipur rubber feet for trans-tibial amputees in low-income countries. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006;30(3):225–236.
- Eide AH, Neupane S, Hem K. Living conditions among people with disability in Nepal. Trondheim: SINTEF Technology and Society, Department of Health Research; 2016. Available from: https://www.sintef.no/globalassets/sintef-a27656-nepal-printversionfinal.pdf/
- The OANDP Edge. Nonprofit develops more affordable prosthetic liners; 2019. Available from: https://opedge.com/Articles/ViewArticle/2019-12-05/nonprofit-develops-more-affordable-prosthetic-liners.
- World Health Organisation (WHO). A manual for public procurement of assistive products, accessories, spare parts and related services. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013988.
- Puli L, Layton N, Mont D, et al. Assistive technology provider experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10477.
- Layton N, Mont D, Puli L, et al. Access to assistive technology during the COVID-19 pandemic: voices of the users and families. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(21):11273.