Effectiveness of different extrinsic feedback forms on motor learning in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review

References

• Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mac Keith RC, Polani PE, Kessel L, et al. Cerebral palsy. The Lancet. 1958;271(7027):961–962.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan MAE, Mehta S, McMahon PJ. Chapter 12. Rehabilitation. In: Skinner HB, McMahon PJ, editors. Current diagnosis & treatment in orthopedics 5th ed. New York (NY): The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2014. p. 531–540.
   Google Scholar
• Kim H., Shoval HA. Pediatric musculoskeletal medicine. In: Mitra R, editor. Principles of rehabilitation medicine. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education; 2019. p. 1005–1028.
   Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Validation of a model of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(10):974–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger W, Quintern J, Dietz V. Pathophysiology of gait in children with cerebral palsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982; 53(5):538–548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olney SJ, MacPhail HE, Hedden DM, et al. Work and power in hemiplegic cerebral palsy gait. Phys Ther. 1990;70(7):431–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani CA. Dorsal rhizotomy for children with cerebral palsy: support for concepts of motor control. Phys Ther. 1991;71(3):248–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams HG, Pfeiffer KA, O'Neill JR, et al. Motor skill performance and physical activity in preschool children. Obesity. 2008;16(6):1421–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd M, Saunders TJ, Bremer E, et al. Long-term importance of fundamental motor skills: a 20-year follow-up study. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2014;31(1):67–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gorp M, E Roebroeck M, van Eck M, et al. Childhood factors predict participation of young adults with cerebral palsy in domestic life and interpersonal relationships: a prospective cohort study. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(22):3162–3171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haibach-Beach PS, Reid G, Collier DH. Motor learning and development. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2018. English.
   Google Scholar
• Magill R, Anderson D. Motor learning and control. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman S, Woods AM, Subramaniam PR. Task structures, feedback to individual students, and student skill level in physical education. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1998;69(4):420–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlton L, Proteau L, Elliott D. Vision and motor control. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Zubiaur M, Oña A, Delgado J. Learning volleyball serves: a preliminary study of the effects of knowledge of performance and of results. Percept Mot Skills. 1999;89(1):223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selder DJ, Del Rolan N. Knowledge of performance, skill level and performance on the balance beam. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1979;4(3):226–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood CA. Alternate forms of knowledge of results: Interaction of augmented feedback modality on learning [gedruckte ressource]. [alternative formen der ergebniskenntnis: Interaktion der modalitaet des verstaerkten feedbacks auf das lernen]. J Hum Move Stud. 1992;22(6):213–230.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs AJ, Buchanan JJ, Shea CH. Impossible is nothing: 5:3 and 4:3 multi-frequency bimanual coordination. Exp Brain Res. 2010;201(2):249–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vander Linden DW, Cauraugh JH, Greene TA. The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Phys Ther. 1993;73(2):79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol. 1990;16(4):677–691.
   Google Scholar
• RAS. Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In: Requin JSGE, editor. Tutorials in motor neuroscience. NATO ASI series (series D: Behavioural and social sciences). Vol. 62. Dordrecht: Springer; 1991. p. 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, et al. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20(1):21–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutsaarts M, Steenbergen B, Bekkering H. Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy. Exp Brain Res. 2006;172(2):151–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschueren SMP, Swinnen SP, Dom R, et al. Interlimb coordination in patients with Parkinson’s disease: motor learning deficits and the importance of augmented information feedback. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 113(3):497–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli MA, Leis B, Van Gemmert AW, et al. The relationship between knowledge of results and motor learning in parkinsonian patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2002;9(2):89–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert MT, Sambasivan K, Levin MF. Extrinsic feedback and upper limb motor skill learning in typically-developing children and children with cerebral palsy: review. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(2):171–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram Y, Lenger R. Gait improvement in patients with cerebral palsy by visual and auditory feedback. Neuromodulation. 2012;15(1):48–52; discussion 52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtner PA, Leinwand R, Sullivan KJ, et al. Motor learning in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: feedback effects on skill acquisition. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamed NS, Abd-Elwahab MS. Pedometer-based gait training in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(2):157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbourne RT. Accuracy of movement speed and error detection skills in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Percept Mot Skills. 2001;93(2):419–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemayattalab R, Rostami LR. Effects of frequency of feedback on the learning of motor skill in individuals with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2010; 31(1):212–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemayattalab R, Arabameri E, Pourazar M, et al. Effects of self-controlled feedback on learning of a throwing task in children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(9):2884–2889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein ZA, Salem IA, Ali MS. Effect of simultaneous proprioceptive-visual feedback on gait of children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. J Musculoskelet Neuron Interact. 2019;19(4):500–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe DE, Valvano J. The effects of knowledge of performance and cognitive strategies on motor skill learning in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002;14(1):2–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valvano J, Newell KM. Practice of a precision isometric grip-force task by children with spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1998;40(7):464–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemayattalab R. Effects of self-control and instructor-control feedback on motor learning in individuals with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2766–2772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot ML, Junkala J. The effects of auditorally augmented feedback on the eye-hand coordination of students with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 1981; 35(8):525–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram Y, Aharon-Peretz J, Simionovici Y, et al. Walking on virtual tiles. Neural Process Lett. 2002;16(3):227–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baram Y, Miller A. Virtual reality cues for improvement of gait in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2006;66(2):178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28(13-14):831–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J, Chung Y. Influence of visual feedback and rhythmic auditory cue on walking of chronic stroke patient induced by treadmill walking in real-time basis. NRE. 2017;41(2):445–452.
   Google Scholar
• Cha YJ, Kim JD, Choi YR, et al. Effects of gait training with auditory feedback on walking and balancing ability in adults after hemiplegic stroke: a preliminary, randomized, controlled study. Int J Rehab Res. 2018;41(3):239–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oscari F, Secoli R, Avanzini F, et al. Substituting auditory for visual feedback to adapt to altered dynamic and kinematic environments during reaching. Exp Brain Res. 2012;221(1):33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnas J, Stemplewski R, Krutki P. Sex differences in maintaining the requested handgrip force enhanced by auditory or visual feedback. IJERPH. 2020;17(14):5158.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Fujii S, Schlaug G. The use of augmented auditory feedback to improve arm reaching in stroke: a case series. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(11):1115–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh HT, Kantak SS, Sullivan KJ. Movement pattern and parameter learning in children: effects of feedback frequency. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012;83(2):346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway B, Bates J, Occhiogrosso B, et al. Interaction of feedback frequency and task difficulty in children's motor skill learning. Phys Ther. 2012;92(7):948–957.,.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii S, Lulic T, Chen JL. More feedback is better than less: Learning a novel upper limb joint coordination pattern with augmented auditory feedback. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle CM, Kim J, Singer RN. Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Percept Mot Skills. 1995;81(2):627–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG, et al. Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1997;68(4):269–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, et al. Learning benefits of self-controlled knowledge of results in 10-year-old children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(3):405–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, de Medeiros FL, et al. Self-controlled feedback in 10-year-old children: higher feedback frequencies enhance learning. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2008;79(1):122–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snapp-Childs W, Fath AJ, Watson CA, et al. Training to improve manual control in 7-8 and 10-12 year old children: Training eliminates performance differences between ages. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;43:90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill-Rowley K, Rose J. Etiology of impaired selective motor control: emerging evidence and its implications for research and treatment in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(6):522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar