170
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients

, , , &
Pages 1405-1411 | Received 06 Oct 2021, Accepted 26 Mar 2022, Published online: 09 Apr 2022

References

  • DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, et al. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(6):500–515.
  • Zou L, Liu F, Shen P, et al. The incidence and risk factors of related lymphedema for breast cancer survivors post-operation: a 2-year follow-up prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer. 2018;25(3):309–314.
  • Erdoğanoğlu Y, Çalık M, Vural M. Functional evaluation of patients with mastectomy lymphedema. Turk J Phys Med Rehab. 2021;67(1):56–61.
  • Klernas P, Johnsson A, Horstmann V, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with lymphoedema - a cross-sectional study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(2):634–644.
  • Vassard D, Olsen MH, Zinckernagel L, et al. Psychological consequences of lymphoedema associated with breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(18):3211–3218.
  • Korucu TS, Ucurum SG, Tastaban E, et al. Comparison of shoulder-arm complex pain, function, and scapular dyskinesia in women with and without unilateral lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021;21(3):e285–e293.
  • Mülkoğlu C, Ayhan F, Erel S. Sexual functions and quality of life in patients developing lymphedema after total mastectomy: a pilot study. Lymphat Res Biol. 2021. DOI:10.1089/lrb.2020.0053
  • Dean LT, Moss SL, Ransome Y, et al. “It still affects our economic situation”: long-term economic burden of breast cancer and lymphedema. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(5):1697–1708.
  • McLaughlin SA, Staley AC, Vicini F, et al. Considerations for clinicians in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: recommendations from a multidisciplinary expert ASBrS panel: part 1: definitions, assessments, education, and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(10):2818–2826.
  • Cornelissen A, Kool M, Keuter X, et al. Quality of life questionnaires in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients: review of the literature. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018;16(2):134–139.
  • Coriddi M, Dayan J, Sobti N, et al. Systematic review of patient-reported outcomes following surgical treatment of lymphedema. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(3):565.
  • Augustin M, Conde ME, Hagenström K, et al. Validation of a short-form of the Freiburg Life Quality Assessment for lymphoedema (FLQA-LS) instrument. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179(6):1329–1333.
  • De Vrieze T, Vos L, Gebruers N, et al. Revision of the lymphedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL): reliability and validity. Lymphat Res Biol. 2019;17(3):347–355.
  • De Vrieze T, Frippiat J, Deltombe T, et al. Cross-cultural validation of the French version of the lymphedema functioning, disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL). Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(19):2797–2804.
  • Klernas P, Johnsson A, Horstmann V, et al. Lymphedema Quality of Life Inventory (LyQLI)-development and investigation of validity and reliability. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(2):427–439.
  • Klernäs P, Johnsson A, Boyages J, et al. Test of responsiveness and sensitivity of the questionnaire “lymphedema quality of life inventory”. Lymphat Res Biol. 2018;16(3):300–308.
  • Monticone M, Ferriero G, Keeley V, et al. Lymphedema quality of life questionnaire (LYMQOL): cross-cultural adaptation and validation in Italian women with upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer. Disabil Rehabil. 2021. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2021.1890842
  • Williams AE, Rapport F, Russell IT, et al. Psychometric development of the Upper Limb Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire demonstrated the patient-reported outcome measure to be a robust measure for breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100:61–70.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549.
  • Zhao H, Wu Y, Tao Y, et al. Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the lymphedema functioning, disability, and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. Cancer Nurs. 2022;45(1):70–82.
  • Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216.
  • Armer JM, Stewart BR. A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population. Lymphat Res Biol. 2005;3(4):208–217.
  • Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):974–986.
  • Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(3):570–579.
  • Wan C, Zhang D, Yang Z, et al. Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the FACT-B for measuring quality of life for patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;106(3):413–418.
  • Coaley K. An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.
  • Dimitrov DM. Statistical methods for validation of assessment scale data in counseling and related fields. Appl Psych Meas. 2007;31(5):367–387.
  • Downing SM. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data. Med Educ. 2004;38(9):1006–1012.
  • Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497.
  • Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467.
  • Osborne JW, Costello AB, Kellow JT. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. In: Osborne JW, editor. Best practices in quantitative methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008.
  • Souza AC, Alexandre N, Guirardello EB. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649–659.
  • Tamam N, Al-Mugren KS, Alrebdi HI, et al. Evaluating the quality of life and sleep quality in saudi women with breast cancer-related lymphedema: a cross-sectional correlational study. Integr Cancer Ther. 2021;20:15347354211046192.
  • Anbari AB, Wanchai A, Armer JM. Breast cancer-related lymphedema and quality of life: a qualitative analysis over years of survivorship. Chronic Illn. 2021;17(3):257–268.
  • Mehnert A, Koch U, Sundermann C, et al. Predictors of fear of recurrence in patients one year after cancer rehabilitation: a prospective study. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1102–1109.
  • Taghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, et al. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;92(3):227–234.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.