Moving into new housing designed for people with disability: preliminary evaluation of outcomes

References

• Veitch JA. Investigating and influencing how buildings affect health: interdisciplinary endeavours. Can Psychol. 2008;49(4):281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle T, Dunn JR. Effects of housing circumstances on health, quality of life and healthcare use for people with severe mental illness: a review. Health Soc Care Community. 2008;16(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh AM, Aitken Z, Baker E, et al. Housing tenure and affordability and mental health following disability acquisition in adulthood. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver S, Gosden-Kaye EZ, Winkler D, et al. The outcomes of individualized housing for people with disability and complex needs: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Current and future demand for specialist disability services. Canberra: AIHW; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Housing for people with intellectual disabilities and the National Disability Insurance Scheme reforms. Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;2(1):45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown J, Mansell J, Kozma A. Deinstitutionalization in intellectual disabilities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20(5):437–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Allocating homes for people with intellectual disability: needs, mix and choice. Soc Pol Admin. 2011;45(3):280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh F. Disability and mental health in Ireland: searching out good practice. Mullingar, Ireland: Genio; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Advisory Council to the NDIS. Pathway to contemporary options of housing and support. Canberra; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Living with disability in inaccessible housing: social, health and economic impacts. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Habitat UN. The right to adequate housing fact sheet no. 21/Rev. 1. Geneva: UN; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Douglas J. Supported decision making. Choice, preference, and disability. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 45–66.
   Google Scholar
• Connellan J. Commentary on housing for people with intellectual disabilities and the National Disability Insurance Scheme reforms (Wiesel, 2015). Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;2(1):56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleporos G, Craig D, Brown M, et al. Housing and support for younger people with disabilities transitioning to independent living: elements for success in the design and implementation of disability care Australia, a National Disability Insurance Scheme. Melbourne (VIC): Youth Disability Advocacy Service; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Bould E, Beadle-Brown J. Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018;43(3):295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichá R, Charlie Lakin K, Larson SA, et al. Correlates of everyday choice and support-related choice for 8,892 randomly sampled adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in 19 states. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;50(6):486–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer M, Bolding N. Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001;45(Pt 5):371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow E, Walker N. Does supported living work for people with severe intellectual disabilities? Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil. 2015;9(6):338–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey R, Kelly F, Craig S, et al. Irish persons with intellectual disability moving from family care to residential accommodation in a period of austerity. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018;31(5):833–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey R, Bunting B, Keogh F, et al. The impact on social relationships of moving from congregated settings to personalized accommodation. J Intellect Disabil. 2019;23(2):149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamwal R, Callaway L, Ackerl J, et al. Electronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: implications for occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(2):89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord JOHN, Hutchison P. Individualised support and funding: building blocks for capacity building and inclusion related papers. Disabil Soc. 2003;18(1):71–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tøssebro J. Scandinavian disability policy: from deinstitutionalisation to non-discrimination and beyond. Alter. 2016;10(2):111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency. NDIS quarterly report to disability ministers – Q4 2020–2021. Australia; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Foster M, Henman P, Tilse C, et al. Reasonable and necessary’ care: the challenge of operationalising the NDIS policy principle in allocating disability care in Australia. Aust J Soc Issues. 2016;51(1):27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency. National Disability Insurance Scheme Act. Canberra; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Robert S. National Disability Insurance Scheme (Specialist Disability Accommodation) Rules 2020. Australia: Government Australia; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Aimers N, Wellecke C, Winkler D, et al. Specialist Disability Accommodation supply in Australia. Melbourne: Summer Foundation; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas JM. Conceptualizing self and maintaining social connection following severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27(1):60–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Lin K-C, Liing R-J, et al. Validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of EQ-5D-5L in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(6):1585–1596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reenen M, Janssen B. EQ-5D-5L user guide: basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Rotterdam: EuroQol Research Foundation; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Parkin D, Devlin NJ. Assessing the performance of the EQ-VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(3):977–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart-Brown S, Janmohamed K. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). User guide. Version 1. NHS Health Scotland, University of Warwick and University of Edinburgh; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, et al. The Community Integration Questionnaire – Revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63(3):143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R. Manual for the Care and Needs Scale (CANS). Unpublished manuscript, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney Revised Version. Vol. 1; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey N, Kaambwa B, Currow DC, et al. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D–5L: South Australian population norms. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunger M, Sabariego C, Stollenwerk B, et al. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the EQ-5D in German stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(7):1205–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainz A, Meisinger C, Linseisen J, et al. Changes of health-related quality of life within the first year after stroke – results from a prospective stroke cohort study. Front Neurol. 2021;12:1746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard SA, Johnson JA, Feeny DH. Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(1):207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost J. Hypothesis testing: an intuitive guide for making data driven decisions. State College (PA): Statistics by Jim Publishing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics. 1945;1(6):80–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu C, Wilcher K, Jones A. Perceived COVID-19 impacts on stress, resilience, and mental health among people with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal prospective study. J Rehabil. 2021;87(1):80–87.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin D, Devlin N. Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost–utility analysis? Health Econ. 2006;15(7):653–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):987–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felce D, Perry J, Kerr M. A comparison of activity levels among adults with intellectual disabilities living in family homes and out-of-family placements. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2011;24(5):421–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner JF, Carran DT. Attainment of personal outcomes by people with developmental disabilities. Ment Retard. 2005;43(3):157–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee B, Mangadu T, Tansey TN, et al. The intermediary role of loneliness in the relationship between COVID-19 stress and maladaptive coping among people with disabilities and chronic health conditions. J Rehabil. 2021;87(1):33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• NDIA. A home for living: Specialist Disability Accommodation Innovation Plan. Report no. DA0426; 2018.
   Google Scholar