695
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Ride-on car training using sitting and standing postures for mobility and socialization in young children with motor delays: a randomized controlled trial

, , , , &
Pages 1453-1460 | Received 12 Aug 2021, Accepted 04 Apr 2022, Published online: 13 Apr 2022

References

  • Huang HH, Galloway JC. Modified ride-on toy cars for early power mobility: a technical report [research support, N.I.H., extramural technical report]. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2012;24(2):149–154.
  • Huang HH, Chen CL. The use of modified ride-on cars to maximize mobility and improve socialization-a group design. Res Dev Disabil. 2017;61:172–180.
  • Logan SW, Feldner HA, Bogart KR, et al. Toy-based technologies for children with disabilities simultaneously supporting self-directed mobility, participation, and function: a technical report. Front Robot AI. 2017;4:1–10.
  • James D, Pfaff J, Jeffries LM. Modified ride-on cars as early mobility for children with mobility limitations: a scoping review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(5):525–542.
  • Bray N, Kolehmainen N, McAnuff J, et al. Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(50):1–194.
  • Pritchard-Wiart L, Bragg E, Thompson-Hodgetts S. The young movers project: a case series describing modified toy car use as an early movement option for young children with mobility limitations. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(6):598–613.
  • Huang HH. Perspectives on early power mobility training, motivation and social participation in young children with motor disabilities. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2330.
  • Huang HH, Huang HW, Chen YM, et al. Modified ride-on cars and mastery motivation in young children with disabilities: effects of environmental modifications. Res Dev Disabil. 2018;83:37–46.
  • Huang HH, Ragonesi CB, Stoner T, et al. Modified toy cars for mobility and socialization: case report of a child with cerebral palsy [case reports research support, N.I.H., extramural]. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26(1):76–84.
  • Logan SW, Feldner HA, Galloway JC, et al. Modified ride-on car use by children with complex medical needs. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016;28(1):100–107.
  • Clearfield MW. Learning to walk changes infants’ social interactions. Infant Behav Dev. 2011;34(1):15–25.
  • Adolph KE, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Ishak S, et al. Locomotor experience and use of social information are posture specific [research support, N.I.H., extramural. Dev Psychol. 2008;44(6):1705–1714.
  • Anderson DI, Campos JJ, Witherington DC, et al. The role of locomotion in psychological development. Front Psychol. 2013;4:440.
  • Kretch KS, Franchak JM, Adolph KE. Crawling and walking infants see the world differently. Child Dev. 2014;85(4):1503–1518.
  • Karasik LB, Tamis-Lemonda CS, Adolph KE. Crawling and walking infants elicit different verbal responses from mothers. Dev Sci. 2014;17(3):388–395.
  • Logan SW, Lobo MA, Feldner HA, et al. Power-up: exploration and play in a novel modified ride-on car for standing. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017;29(1):30–37.
  • Logan SW, Catena MA, Sabet A, et al. Standing tall: feasibility of a modified ride-on car that encourages standing. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2019;31(1):E6–E13.
  • Hospodar CM, Sabet A, Logan SW, et al. Exploratory analysis of a developmentally progressive modified ride-on car intervention for young children with down syndrome. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15:1–9.
  • Huang HH, Chen YM, Huang HW, et al. Modified ride-on cars and young children with disabilities: effects of combining mobility and social training. Front Pediatr. 2018;5:299.
  • Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 2000.
  • Huang H-H, Chang C-H, Tsai W-Y, et al. Ride-on cars with different postures and motivation in children with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2022;76(3):1–10.
  • Logan SW, Huang HH, Stahlin K, et al. Modified ride-on car for mobility and socialization: single-case study of an infant with down syndrome. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26(4):418–426.
  • Hsu CC, Su S, Shao SJ, et al. Chinese child developmental inventory: a tentative normative data. Acta Paediatr Sin. 1978;19:142–157.
  • Wu HC, Hsu CC, Chiu V, et al. Diagnostic validity of the Chinese child development inventory in screening children with developmental language delay. Tzu Chi Med J. 2013;25(4):228–232.
  • Schmidt RC, Fitzpatrick P. Dynamical perspective on motor learning. In: Zelaznik HN, editor. Advances in motor learning and control. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1996. p. 195–223.
  • Newell KM, Liu Y, Mayer-Kress G. Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychol Rev. 2001;108(1):57–82.
  • Huang HH, Chen YM, Huang HW. Ride-on car training for behavioral changes in mobility and socialization among young children with disabilities. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017;29(3):207–213.
  • Chen KL, Hsieh CL, Sheu CF, et al. Reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory in children with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(4):273–278.
  • Feldman AB, Haley SM, Coryell J. Concurrent and construct validity of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Phys Ther. 1990;70(10):602–610.
  • Chen KL, Tseng MH, Hu FC, et al. Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory: a cross-cultural comparison of daily function between Taiwanese and American children. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(6):1590–1600.
  • Knox V, Usen Y. Clinical review of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Br J Occup Ther. 2000;63(1):29–32.
  • Kenyon LK, Hostnik L, McElroy R, et al. Power mobility training methods for children: a systematic review. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018;30(1):2–8.
  • King GA, McDougall J, Palisano RJ, et al. Goal attainment scaling: its use in evaluating pediatric therapy programs. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1999;19:31–52.
  • Palisano RJ. Validity of goal attainment scaling in infants with motor delays. Phys Ther. 1993;73(10):651–658; discussion 658–660.
  • Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Galama K, et al. Goal attainment scaling in paediatric rehabilitation: a report on the clinical training of an interdisciplinary team. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34(4):521–529.
  • Kiresuk TJ, Smith A, Cardillo JE. Goal attainment scaling: applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1994.
  • Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):362–370.
  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, et al. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2003.
  • Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, et al. Establishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2003;83(10):888–898.
  • Adolph KE, Kretch KS. Gibson’s theory of perceptual learning. In: H Keller DS, editor. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2015. p. 127–134.
  • Case-Smith J, O’Brien CJ. Occupational therapy for children and adolescents. 6th ed. Maryland Heights (MO): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
  • Burtner PA, Leinwand R, Sullivan KJ, et al. Motor learning in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: feedback effects on skill acquisition. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):259–266.
  • Gibson EJ, Pick AD. An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000.
  • Berthier NE, Rosenstein MT, Barto AG. Approximate optimal control as a model for motor learning. Psychol Rev. 2005;112(2):329–346.
  • Richardson ZS, Khetani MA, Scully E, et al. Social and functional characteristics of receipt and service use intensity of core early intervention services. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19(7):722–732.
  • Richardson ZS, Scully EA, Dooling-Litfin JK, et al. Early intervention service intensity and change in children’s functional capabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(5):815–821.
  • Law MC, Darrah J, Pollock N, et al. Focus on function: a cluster, randomized controlled trial comparing child- versus context-focused intervention for young children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(7):621–629.
  • Hoch JE, Rachwani J, Adolph KE. Where infants go: real-time dynamics of locomotor exploration in crawling and walking infants. Child Dev. 2020;91(3):1001–1020.
  • Thurman SL, Corbetta D. Spatial exploration and changes in infant-mother dyads around transitions in infant locomotion. Dev Psychol. 2017;53(7):1207–1221.
  • Franchak JM, Kretch KS, Adolph KE. See and be seen: infant-caregiver social looking during locomotor free play. Dev Sci. 2018;21(4):e12626.
  • Saxena S, Kumaran S, Rao BK. Energy expenditure during standing in children with cerebral palsy: a brief report. PRM. 2016;9(3):241–245.
  • Verschuren O, Peterson MD, Leferink S, et al. Muscle activation and energy-requirements for varying postures in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr. 2014;165(5):1011–1016.
  • Haley SM, Coster WJ, Ludlow LH, et al. Pediatric evaluation of disability inventory: development, standardization and administration manual. Boston (MA): New England Medical Center Publications; 1992.
  • Harpster K, Sheehan A, Foster EA, et al. The methodological application of goal attainment scaling in pediatric rehabilitation research: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(24):2855–2864.
  • Livingstone R, Paleg G. Practice considerations for the introduction and use of power mobility for children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):210–221.
  • Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(5):411–416.
  • Campos JJ, Anderson DI, Barbu-Roth MA, et al. Travel broadens the mind. Infancy. 2000;1(2):149–219.
  • Clearfield MW, Osborne CN, Mullen M. Learning by looking: infants’ social looking behavior across the transition from crawling to walking. J Exp Child Psychol. 2008;100(4):297–307.23.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.