Comprehensive approach to reintegration of disability benefit recipients with multiple problems (CARm) into the labour market: results of a randomized controlled trial

References

• OECD. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264088856-en.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Activating the unemployed: what countries do. OECD Employ Outlook 2007 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/40777063.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dean H, MacNeill V, Melrose M. Ready to work? Understanding the experiences of people with multiple problems and needs. Benefits. 2003;11:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JP. Activation and active labour market policies in OECD countries: stylised facts and evidence on their effectiveness. IZA J Labor Policy. 2015;4:4.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselaar J, Prins R, Maurits E, et al. Multiproblematiek bij cliënten, verslag van een verkenning in relatie tot (arbeids) participatie [Clients with multiple problems. An orientation and report in relation to (labour)participation]. Meccano kennis voor beleid en AStri Beleidsonderzoek en-advies; Utrecht/Leiden: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment; 2010. [In Dutch]
   Google Scholar
• Berthoud RM. Disadvantage in employment: a quantitative analysis. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenberg E. On the way to work: welfare participants and barriers to employment. Econ Dev Q. 2002;16(4):314–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins D, Nelms L. Assisting the most disadvantaged job seekers. In: Carlson E, editor. A future that works: economics, employment and the environment. Newcastle: Centre of Full Employment and Equity, University of Newcastle; 2004. p. 371.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay S. Discrimination and other barriers to employment for teens and young adults with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1340–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brongers KA, Cornelius B, Van Der Klink JJL, et al. Development and evaluation of a strength-based method to promote employment of work-disability benefit recipients with multiple problems: a feasibility study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audhoe SS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Hoving JL, et al. Perspectives of unemployed workers with mental health problems: barriers to and solutions for return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(1):28–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brongers KA, Hoekstra T, Roelofs PDDM, et al. Prevalence, types, and combinations of multiple problems among recipients of work disability benefits. Disabil Rehabil. 2021. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2021.1900931
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singley S. Barriers to employment among long-term beneficiaries: a review of recent international evidence. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Brongers KA, Cornelius B, Roelofs PDDM, et al. Feasibility of family group conference to promote return-to-work of persons receiving work disability benefit. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(22):3227–3236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa L, Ribeiro C, Rodrigues S. Are practitioners incorporating a strengths-focused approach when working with multi-problem poor families? J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;17(1):53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp CA, Goscha RJ. The strengths model: a recovery-oriented approach to mental health services. 3rd ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bitter N, Roeg D, van Assen M, et al. How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, et al. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345(1):e5661–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. Wet werk en inkomen naar arbeidsvermogen [Work and Income Act] [Internet]. Netherlands; 2005. Available from: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0019057/2020-03-19.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid. Schattingsbesluit Arbeidsongeschiktheidswetten [Disability Assessment Rule] [Internet]. Netherlands; 2000. Available from: https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0011478/2021-01-01.
   Google Scholar
• Üstün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, R J. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJL, de Boer MR, et al. Predictors of functional improvement and future work status after the disability benefit claim: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):680–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(9):1521–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Grimshaw J, Steen N. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5(1):12–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• den Hollander D, Wilken JP. Supporting recovery and inclusion. Working with the CARe model. Uitgeverij SWP; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Diehr P, Patrick DL, Spertus J, et al. Transforming self-rated health and the SF-36 scales to include death and improve interpretability. Med Care. 2001;39(7):670–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan JA, Aaronson N, Cappelleri JC, et al. Assessing the clinical significance of single items relative to summated scores. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):479–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The WHOQOL GROUP. Development of the world health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA. The world health organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial a report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(2):299–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Sonderen E. The measurement of social support with the social support list-interactions (SSL-I) and the social support list-discrepancies (SSL–D). Dutch manual. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Bosselaar H, Maurits E, Molenaar-Cox P. Clients with multiple problems. An orientation and report in relation to (labour)participation. (In Dutch): Multiproblematiek bij cliënten. Verslag van een verkenning in relatie tot (arbeids)participatie). Meccano kennis voor beleid en AStri Beleidsonderzoek en-advies; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Azuero A, Pisu M, McNees P, et al. An application of longitudinal analysis with skewed outcomes. Nurs Res. 2010;59(4):301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malehi AS, Pourmotahari F, Angali KA. Statistical models for the analysis of skewed healthcare cost data: a simulation study. Health Econ Rev. 2015;5:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammouri HM, Sabo RT, Alsaadawi R, et al. Handling skewed data: a comparison of two popular methods. Appl Sci. 2020;10(18):6247.
   Google Scholar
• van Ours JC. The locking-in effect of subsidized jobs. J Comp Econ. 2004;32:37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner M, Miquel R, Wunsch C. Long-run effects of public sector sponsored training in West Germany. J Eur Econ Assoc. 2011;9(4):742–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medalia A, Choi J. Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009;19(3):353–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heer-Wunderink C d. Successful community living: a “UTOPIA”? A survey of people with severe mental illness in Dutch regional institutes for residential care. 2012. Available from: https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/successful-community-living-a-utopia-a-survey-of-people-with-seve
   Google Scholar