Supporting rehabilitation stakeholders in making service delivery decisions: a rapid review of multi-criteria decision analysis methods

References

• Barratt A. Evidence based medicine and shared decision making: the challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):407–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Juhnke C. Patient preferences versus physicians’ judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(3):163–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan JG. Shared decision-making-transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):418–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A. Making good decisions in healthcare with multi-criteria decision analysis: the use, current research and future development of MCDA. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(1):29–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thokala P, Devlin N, Marsh K, et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making-an introduction: report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh K, IJzerman M, Thokala P, et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making-emerging good practices: report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(2):125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terris-Prestholt F, Neke N, Grund JM, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to inform the design of complex interventions. Trials. 2019;20(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallego G, Dew A, Lincoln M, et al. Carers’ preferences for the delivery of therapy services for people with disability in rural Australia: evidence from a discrete choice experiment. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(5):371–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006;4:14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolan JG. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: a primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient. 2010;3(4):229–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frazão TDC, Camilo DGG, Cabral ELS, et al. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in health care: a systematic review of the main characteristics and methodological steps. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adunlin G, Diaby V, Xiao H. Application of multicriteria decision analysis in health care: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):1894–1905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancsar E, Swait J. Reconceptualising the external validity of discrete choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(10):951–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaife M, Terris-Prestholt F, Di Tanna GL, et al. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity. Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19(8):1053–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, et al. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):10–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Peters MDJ, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, et al. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Adelaide (SA): JBI; 2020. https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Zarin W, Antony J, et al. An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;70:61–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne (Australia): Veritas Health Innovation; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. NVIvo qualitative data analysis software, 10th ed. Doncaster: QSR International Pty Ltd.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(9):1212–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboagye E, Hagberg J, Axén I, et al. Individual preferences for physical exercise as secondary prevention for non-specific low back pain: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaine K, Rogers J, OʼNeill MR, et al. Clinician perceptions of the importance of hospital discharge components for children. J Healthc Qual. 2018;40(2):79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyde M, Rankin J, Whitty JA, et al. Patient preferences for the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(12):2162–2169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CR, Fargher E, Plumpton C, et al. Investigating preferences for support with life after stroke: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(63):63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charles JM, Roberts JL, Ud Din N, et al. Preferences of older patients regarding hip fracture rehabilitation service configuration: a feasibility discrete choice experiment. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(7):636–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen LC, Cheng LJ, Zhang Y, et al. Acupuncture or low frequency infrared treatment for low back pain in Chinese patients: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claassen AAOM, Kremers–van de Hei K, van den Hoogen FHJ, et al. Most important frequently asked questions from patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a best-worst scaling exercise. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71(7):885–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day SD, Nguyen KH, Comans T, et al. Professional development training preferences of occupational therapists working with older adults in Australia: a discrete choice experiment. Aust Occup Ther J. 2021;68(4):327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne F, Mitton C, MacDonald T, et al. The challenge of obtaining information necessary for multi-criteria decision analysis implementation: the case of physiotherapy services in Canada. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013;11(1):11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon S, Nancarrow SA, Enderby PM, et al. Assessing patient preferences for the delivery of different community-based models of care using a discrete choice experiment. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1204–1214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira GE, Howard K, Zadro JR, et al. People considering exercise to prevent low back pain recurrence prefer exercise programs that differ from programs known to be effective: a discrete choice experiment. J Physiother. 2020;66(4):249–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco MR, Howard K, Sherrington C, et al. Eliciting older people’s preferences for exercise programs: a best-worst scaling choice experiment. J Physiother. 2015;61(1):34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego G, Dew A, Bulkeley K, et al. Factors affecting retention of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural New South Wales, Australia: discrete choice experiment questionnaire development. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(22):22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gallego G, Dew A, Lincoln M, et al. Should I stay or should I go? Exploring the job preferences of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural Australia. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13(53):53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geidl W, Knocke K, Schupp W, et al. Measuring stroke patients’ exercise preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Neurol Int. 2018;10(1):6993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert AW, Mentzakis E, May CR, et al. Patient preferences for use of virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: results from a discrete choice experiment. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022;27(1):62–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel JMM, Snoek GJ, Van Til JA, et al. A multicriteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limbs in persons with tetraplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(5):635–644.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IJzerman MJ, Van Til JA, Bridges JFP. A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation. Patient. 2012;5(1):45–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaambwa B, Ratcliffe J, Shulver W, et al. Investigating the preferences of older people for telehealth as a new model of health care service delivery: a discrete choice experiment. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):301–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra S, Ajmera P, Chorsiya V, et al. Telerehabilitation services in India: an integrated SWOT and AHP analysis. Int J Physiother. 2021;8(3):170–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karyani AK, Rashidian A, Sari AA, et al. Developing attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment on basic health insurance in Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018;32(26).
   Google Scholar
• Karyani AK, Sari AA, Woldemichael A. Eliciting preferences for health insurance in Iran using discrete choice experiment analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(8):488–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer T, Gyrd-Hansen D. Preference heterogeneity and choice of cardiac rehabilitation program: results from a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2008;85(1):124–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer T, Gyrd-Hansen D, Willaing I. Investigating patients’ preferences for cardiac rehabilitation in Denmark. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006;22(2):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhani A, Zeeman H, Wright CJ, et al. Stakeholder priorities for inclusive accessible housing: a systematic review and multicriteria decision analysis. J Multi‐Crit Decis Anal. 2020;27(1-2):5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver K, Ratcliffe J, George S, et al. Early rehabilitation management after stroke: What do stroke patients prefer? J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(4):354–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver K, Ratcliffe J, George S, et al. Is the Nintendo Wii fit really acceptable to older people? A discrete choice experiment. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11(64).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laver K, Ratcliffe J, George S, et al. Preferences for rehabilitation service delivery: a comparison of the views of patients, occupational therapists and other rehabilitation clinicians using a discrete choice experiment. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(2):93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S-F, Lee W-S. Promoting the quality of hospital service for children with developmental delays. Serv Ind J. 2013;33(15–16):1514–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang HW, Chen HG. The need scoping and prioritization of the medical team to integrate new technologies for inpatient rehabilitation services. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120(1 Pt 1):242–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberz D, Borgeson H, Dobson S, et al. A physical therapy mobility checkup for older adults: feasibility and participant preferences from a discrete choice experiment. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2022;9(1):24–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo C, Tran Y, Anderson K, et al. Functional priorities in persons with spinal cord injury: using discrete choice experiments to determine preferences. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(21):1958–1968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milte R, Ratcliffe J, Miller M, et al. What are frail older people prepared to endure to achieve improved mobility following hip fracture? A discrete choice experiment. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(1):81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milte R, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, et al. Cognitive overload? An exploration of the potential impact of cognitive functioning in discrete choice experiments with older people in health care. Value Health. 2014;17(5):655–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher A, Bethge S. Preferences of overweight and obese patients for weight loss programs: a discrete-choice experiment. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13(3):e034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Napora JK, Demyanovich H, Mulliken A, et al. Patients’ preferences for occupational therapy after upper extremity fractures: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e039888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsahin I, Mustapha MT, Albarwary S, et al. An investigation to choose the proper therapy technique in the management of autism spectrum disorder. J Comp Eff Res. 2021;10(5):423–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SS, Canning CG, Löfgren N, et al. People with Parkinson’s disease are more willing to do additional exercise if the exercise program has specific attributes: a discrete choice experiment. J Physiother. 2021;67(1):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecchia L, Bath PA, Pendleton N, et al. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for examining healthcare professionals’ assessments of risk factors: the relative importance of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people. Methods Inf Med. 2010;49:435–444.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinto D, Danilovich MK, Hansen P, et al. Qualitative development of a discrete choice experiment for physical activity interventions to improve Knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1210–1216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poder TG, Beffarat M, Benkhalti M, et al. A discrete choice experiment on preferences of patients with low back pain about non-surgical treatments: identification, refinement and selection of attributes and levels. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:933–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademaker MM, Essers BAB, Stokroos RJ, et al. What tinnitus therapy outcome measures are important for patients? – A discrete choice experiment. Front Neurol. 2021;12(668880).
   Google Scholar
• Raymond M-H, Demers L, Feldman DE. Differences in waiting list prioritization preferences of occupational therapists, elderly people, and persons with disabilities: a discrete choice experiment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(1):35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahabi S, Skempes D, Behzadifar M, et al. Recommendations to improve insurance coverage for physiotherapy services in Iran: a multi criteria decision-making approach. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021;19(1):80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamuli E, Torgerson D, Northgraves M, et al. Identifying the primary outcome for a randomised controlled trial in rheumatoid arthritis: the role of a discrete choice experiment. J Foot Ankle Res. 2017;10(57):57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Niekerk K, Dada S, Tönsing K. Perspectives of rehabilitation professionals on assistive technology provision to young children in South Africa: a national survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;0(0):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, et al. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):457–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Wu J, Lin Q. A novel method for designing and optimizing the layout of facilities in bathroom for the elderly in home-based rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):333–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Wong ELY, Wong AYK, et al. Preference of older adults for flexibility in service and providers in community-based social care: a discrete choice experiment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb EJD, Lynch Y, Meads D, et al. Finding the best fit: examining the decision-making of augmentative and alternative communication professionals in the UK using a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e030274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb EJD, Meads D, Lynch Y, et al. What’s important in AAC decision making for children? Evidence from a best-worst scaling survey. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(2):80–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi D, Ryan M, Campbell S, et al. Using discrete choice experiments to inform randomised controlled trials: an application to chronic low back pain management in primary care. Eur J Pain. 2011;15(5):531.e1–531.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo J, Yoon M, Lee CK, et al. An exploratory survey of priorities in establishing telepractice system for SLPs and caregivers in Korea. Commun Disord Q. 2021;42(4):230–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere JJ, Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4(Pt 4):527–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauber AB, González JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Zweifel P, Kaczynski A, et al. Experimental measurement of preferences in health care using best-worst scaling (BWS): theoretical and statistical issues. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6(5).
   Google Scholar
• Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, et al. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6(2).
   Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Boland L, et al. 20th anniversary ottawa decision support framework: part 3 overview of systematic reviews and updated framework. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(3):379–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert AW, May CR, Brown H, et al. A qualitative investigation into the results of a discrete choice experiment and the impact of COVID-19 on patient preferences for virtual consultations. Arch Physiother. 2021;11(1):20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, et al. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar