Explicit versus implicit lower extremity sensory retraining for post-stroke chronic sensory deficits: a randomized controlled trial

References

• Asanuma H, Pavlides C. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals. NeuroReport. 1997;8(4):i–vi.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ, Friel KM, Delia SW. Role of sensory deficits in motor impairments after injury to primary motor cortex. Neuropharmacology. 2000;39(5):733–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino H, Hwang EJ, Hedrick NG, et al. Circuit mechanisms of sensorimotor learning. Neuron. 2016;92(4):705–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM, Macdonell RA, Matyas TA. SENSe: study of the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation on sensation: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(4):304–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson S, Crow JL, Connell L, et al. Sensory impairments of the lower limb after stroke: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):441–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JE, Hedman LD. Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(3):200–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Bourbonnais D, Noreau L, et al. Participation after stroke compared to normal aging. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(6):353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM, Lamp G, Turville M. The state-of-the-science on somatosensory function and its impact on daily life in adults and older adults, and following stroke: a scoping review. Occup Ther J. 2016;36:27S–41S.
   Google Scholar
• Gorst T, Rogers A, Morrison SC, et al. The prevalence, distribution, and functional importance of lower limb somatosensory impairments in chronic stroke survivors: a cross sectional observational study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(20):2443–2450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schabrun SM, Hillier S. Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(1):27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia FS, Kuys S, Low Choy N. Sensory retraining of the leg after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(6):964–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumpa LU, Cahill LS, Carey LM. Somatosensory assessment and treatment after stroke: an evidence-practice gap. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle S, Bennett S, Fasoli SE, et al. Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010:CD006331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Serrada I, Hordacre B, Hillier S. Does sensory retraining improve sensation and sensorimotor function following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morioka S, Yagi F. Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(6):600–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byl N, Roderick J, Mohamed O, et al. Effectiveness of sensory and motor rehabilitation of the upper limb following the principles of neuroplasticity: patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17(3):176–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(3):241–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch E, Hillier S, Stiller K, et al. Sensory retraining of the lower limb after acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(9):1101–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smania N, Montagnana B, Faccioli S, et al. Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(11):1692–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turville ML, Cahill LS, Matyas TA, et al. The effectiveness of somatosensory retraining for improving sensory function in the arm following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(5):834–846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey LM. SENSe, helping stroke survivors regain a sense of touch. A manual for therapists. An evidence-based approach to sensory rehabilitation after stroke. Australia: The Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Melbourne Brain Centre; 2012. p. 201.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer Y, Elboim Gabyzon M. Does sensory transcutaneous electrical stimulation enhance motor recovery following a stroke? A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(9):799–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell JP, Masters RS, Eves FF. From novice to no know-how: a longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. J Sports Sci. 2000;18(2):111–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab M, Masters RSW, Maxwell J, et al. Discovery learning in sports: implicit or explicit processes? Int J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009;7(4):413–430.
   Google Scholar
• Kal E, Prosée R, Winters M, et al. Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor skills compared to explicit motor learning? A systematic review. PLOS One. 2018;13(9):e0203591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleynen M, Braun SM, Bleijlevens MH, et al. Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. PLOS One. 2014;9(6):e100227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yekutiel M. Sensory reeducation of the hand after stroke. London and Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers Ltd.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Flor H, Denke C, Schaefer M, et al. Effect of sensory discrimination training on cortical reorganisation and phantom limb pain. Lancet. 2001;357(9270):1763–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal E, Winters M, van der Kamp J, et al. Is implicit motor learning preserved after stroke? A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLOS One. 2016;11(12):e0166376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie LJ, Kleynen M, Meijer K, et al. Implicit and explicit motor learning interventions have similar effects on walking speed in people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2021;101(5):pzab017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MJ, Riddoch MJ, Crome P. Test–retest stability of three tests for unilateral visual neglect in patients with stroke: star cancellation, line bisection, and the baking tray task. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14(4):403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamay S, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1641–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiengkaew V, Jitaree K, Chaiyawat P. Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1201–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell Krotoski J, Tomancik E. The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. J Hand Surg Am. 1987;12(1):155–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ofek H, Alperin M, Laufer Y. Lower Extremity Position Test: a new clinical quantitative assessment tool of proprioception post stroke. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):479–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flansbjer U-B, Holmbäck AM, Downham D, et al. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(2):75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blennerhassett JM, Carey LM, Matyas TA. Grip force regulation during pinch grip lifts under somatosensory guidance: comparison between people with stroke and healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(3):418–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattenstroth J, Kalisch T, Peters S, et al. Long-term sensory stimulation therapy improves hand function and restores cortical responsiveness in patients with chronic cerebral lesions. Three single case studies. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner W, Ryser L, Huber E, et al. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82(11):1098–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A(1):M28–M34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers AM. Discriminative and evaluative properties of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53A:287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting with neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchignoni F, Horak F, Godi M, et al. Using psychometric techniques to improve the balance evaluation systems test: the mini-BESTest. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(4):323–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S-M, Studenski S, Duncan PW, et al. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1840–1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S-M, Perera S, Duncan P, et al. Physical and social functioning after stroke: comparison of the stroke impact scale and short form-36. Stroke. 2003;34(2):488–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ. Predicting activities after stroke: what is clinically relevant? Int J Stroke. 2013;8(1):25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han L, Law Gibson D, Reding M. Key neurological impairments influence function-related group outcomes after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1920–1924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page P. Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(5):726–736.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fulk GD, Echternach JL. Test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change of gait speed in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32(1):8–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dal Bello-Haas V, Klassen L, Sheppard MS, et al. Psychometric properties of activity, self-efficacy, and quality-of-life measures in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physiother Can. 2011;63(1):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp MK, Niebuhr R, Roche P, et al. A prospective study to establish the minimal clinically important difference of the Mini-BESTest in individuals with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K-c, Fu T, Wu C-y, et al. Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the stroke impact scale in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):486–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar