Free-living monitoring of ambulatory activity after treatments for lower extremity musculoskeletal cancers using an accelerometer-based wearable – a new paradigm to outcome assessment in musculoskeletal oncology?

References

• Davis AM, Punniyamoorthy S, Griffin AM, et al. Symptoms and their relationship to disability following treatment for lower extremity tumours. Sarcoma. 1999;3(2):73–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enneking WF, editor. Modification of the system for functional evaluation in the surgical management of musculoskeletal tumors. In: Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. New York (NY): Churchill Livingston; 1987. p. 626–639.
   Google Scholar
• Furtado S, Errington L, Godfrey A, et al. Objective clinical measurement of physical functioning after treatment for lower extremity sarcoma; a systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(6):968–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty CP, Bennett MB, Dickinson IC, et al. Assessment of kinematic and kinetic patterns following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma. Gait Posture. 2009;30(4):547–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carty CP, Bennett MB, Dickinson IC, et al. Electromyographic assessment of gait function following limb salvage procedures for bone sarcoma. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010;20(3):502–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(3):267–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilas-Boas MDC, Choupina HMP, Rocha AP, et al. Full-body motion assessment: concurrent validation of two body tracking depth sensors versus a gold standard system during gait. J Biomech. 2019;87:189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arif M, Kattan A. Physical activities monitoring using wearable acceleration sensors attached to the body. PLOS One. 2015;10(7):e0130851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Din S, Godfrey A, Mazzà C, et al. Free-living monitoring of Parkinson's disease: lessons from the field. Mov Disord. 2016;31(9):1293–1313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freedson P, Bowles HR, Troiano R, et al. Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl. 1):S1–S4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DM, O'Brien ES, Kamrud KE, et al. Utilization of wearable technology to assess gait and mobility post-stroke: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):67–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaric M, Brooks E, Moore L, et al. Effects of physical activity on cancer survival: a systematic review. Physiother Can. 2010;62(1):25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado S, Grimer RJ, Cool P, et al. Physical functioning, pain and quality of life after amputation for musculoskeletal tumours: a national survey. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-b(9):1284–1290. Sep
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum D, Brandes M, Hardes J, et al. Physical activity levels after limb salvage surgery are not related to clinical scores-objective activity assessment in 22 patients after malignant bone tumor treatment with modular prostheses. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98(2):97–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dam MS, Kok GJ, Munneke M, et al. Measuring physical activity in patients after surgery for a malignant tumour in the leg. The reliability and validity of a continuous ambulatory activity monitor. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(7):1015–1019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tudor-Locke C, Bassett DR. How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health. Sports Med. 2004;34(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey A, Del Din S, Rochester L, et al. Detecting free-living steps and walking bouts: validating an algorithm for macro gait analysis. Physiol Meas. 2017;38(1):N1–N15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano MA, Borradaile KE, Lewis BA, et al. Accelerometer use in a physical activity intervention trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010;31(6):514–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis RA, Neal RD, Williams NH, et al. Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2009;59(564):e234–e247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantz M, Skubic M, Abbott C, et al. Automated in-home fall risk assessment and detection sensor system for elders. Gerontologist. 2015;55(Suppl. 1):S78–S87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson EK, Rose PW, Neal RD, et al. Personalised cancer follow-up: risk stratification, needs assessment or both?. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado S, Godfrey A, Del Din S, et al. Are accelerometer-based functional outcome assessments feasible and valid after treatment for lower extremity sarcomas? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(3):482–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis AM, Wright JG, Williams JI, et al. Development of a measure of physical function for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(5):508–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1995;4(6):523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore D. The basic practice of statistics. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brodie MA, Lord SR, Coppens MJ, et al. Eight-week remote monitoring using a freely worn device reveals unstable gait patterns in older fallers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62(11):2588–2594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladha CJL, Olivier P. Shaker table validation of OpenMovement AX3 accelerometer. Ahmerst (ICAMPAM 2013 AMHERST), Ahmerst (ICAMPAM 2013 AMHERST). In 3rd International Conference on Ambulatory Monitoring of Physical Activity and Movement. 2013. p. 69–70.
   Google Scholar
• van Schooten KR, Elders PJ, Lips P, et al. Assessing physical activity in older adults: required days of trunk accelerometer measurements for reliable estimation. J Aging Phys Act. 2015;23(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velotta JW, Ramirez A, Winstead J, et al. Relationship between leg dominance tests and type of task. In: ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Del Din S, Godfrey A, Galna B, et al. Free-living gait characteristics in ageing and Parkinson's disease: impact of environment and ambulatory bout length. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godfrey A, Lord S, Galna B, et al. The association between retirement and age on physical activity in older adults. Age Ageing. 2014;43(3):386–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey A, Morris R, Hickey A, et al. Beyond the front end: investigating a thigh worn accelerometer device for step count and bout detection in Parkinson's disease. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38(12):1524–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord S, Galna B, Rochester L. Moving forward on gait measurement: toward a more refined approach. Mov Disord. 2013;28(11):1534–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Din S, Godfrey A, Rochester L. Validation of an accelerometer to quantify a comprehensive battery of gait characteristics in healthy older adults and Parkinson's disease: toward clinical and at home use. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2016;20(3):838–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfrey A, Del Din S, Barry G, et al. Instrumenting gait with an accelerometer: a system and algorithm examination. Med Eng Phys. 2015;37(4):400–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie MAD, Coppens MJM, Lord SR, et al. Wearable pendant device monitoring using new wavelet-based methods shows daily life and laboratory gaits are different. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2016;54(4):663–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin ED, Najafi B, Murer K, et al. Quantification of everyday motor function in a geriatric population. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(3):417–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk M, Hauer K, Zieschang T, et al. Sensor-derived physical activity parameters can predict future falls in people with dementia. Gerontology. 2014;60(6):483–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy RM. What hypotheses do “nonparametric” two-group tests actually test? Stata J. 2012;12(2):182–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R, Rubin DB. r equivalent: a simple effect size indicator. Psychol Methods. 2003;8(4):492–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao C, Ye J, Esteves RM, et al. Using Spearman's correlation coefficients for exploratory data analysis on big dataset. Concurrency Comput Pract Experience. 2016;28(14):3866–3878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara J, O'Brien N, Godfrey A, et al. Pilot randomised controlled trial of a web-based intervention to promote healthy eating, physical activity and meaningful social connections compared with usual care control in people of retirement age recruited from workplaces. PLOS One. 2016;11(7):e0159703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews CE, Hagströmer M, Pober DM, et al. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl. 1):S68–S76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugiura H, Katagiri H, Yonekawa M, et al. Walking ability and activities of daily living after limb salvage operations for malignant bone and soft-tissue tumors of the lower limbs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121(3):131–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neill B, McDonough SM, Wilson JJ, et al. Comparing accelerometer, pedometer and a questionnaire for measuring physical activity in bronchiectasis: a validity and feasibility study? Respir Res. 2017;18(1):16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksnes LH, Bauer HC, Jebsen NL, et al. Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90-B(6):786–794.
   Google Scholar
• Ku PX, Abu Osman NA, Wan Abas WAB. Balance control in lower extremity amputees during quiet standing: a systematic review. Gait Posture. 2014;39(2):672–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health; 2002; [cited 2016 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):329–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor-Locke C, Craig CL, Aoyagi Y, et al. How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:80–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield ED, Ducharme N, Koski KG. Individual, social and environmental factors influencing physical activity levels and behaviours of multiethnic socio-economically disadvantaged urban mothers in Canada: a mixed methods approach. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman A, Smith B, Stoker L, et al. Geographical influences upon physical activity participation: evidence of a 'coastal effect'. Aust N Z J Public Health. 1999;23(3):322–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey A, Stuart S, O'Donovan K, et al. Walk on the wild side: the complexity of free-living mobility assessment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(6):624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storm FA, Heller BW, Mazzà C. Step detection and activity recognition accuracy of seven physical activity monitors. PLOS One. 2015;10(3):e0118723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar