Ethical aspects of the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a qualitative study

References

• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. Fit mind, fit job: from evidence to practice in mental health and work. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish Social Insurance Agency [SSIA]. Uppföljning av sjukfrånvarons utveckling 2020 [follow up of the development of sickness absence 2020]. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• OECD E. Union (EU). Health at a glance: Europe 2018: State of health in the EU cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbiere M, Mazaniello-Chezol M, Bastien MF, et al. Stakeholders’ role and actions in the return-to-work process of workers on Sick-Leave due to common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(3):381–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell E, Kosny A. Communication and collaboration among return-to-work stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(22):2630–2639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liukko J, Kuuva N. Cooperation of return-to-work professionals: the challenges of multi-actor work disability management. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1466–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, et al. The work ability divide: holistic and reductionistic approaches in swedish interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(3):264–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund L, Hellman T, Engblom M, et al. Coordination of return-to-work for employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: facilitators and barriers. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;2020:1–9. Epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Skarpaas LS, Haveraaen LA, Smastuen MC, et al. Horizontal return to work coordination was more common in RTW programs than the recommended vertical coordination. The Rapid-RTW cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand MJ, Nastasia I, Coutu MF, et al. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkkainen R, Saaranen T, Rasanen K. Return-to-work coordinators’ practices for workers with burnout. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(3):493–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohatko-Naismith J, Guest M, James C, et al. Australian general practitioners’ perspective on the role of the workplace return-to-Work coordinator. Aust J Prim Health. 2018;24(6):502–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lag om koordineringsinsatser för sjukskrivna patienter [act on coordination measures for persons on sick leave] (SFS:2019:1297). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Heintz E, Lintamo L, Hultcrantz M, et al. Framework for systematic identification of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies: the Sbu approach. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31(3):124–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21(3):312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schandelmaier S, Ebrahim S, Burkhardt SCA, et al. Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, et al. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;3(3):CD011618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li W, Wolbring G. Analysis of engagement between ethics and return-to-work discourses in respective academic literature. Work. 2019;64(1):3–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ståhl C, MacEachen E, Lippel K. Ethical perspectives in work disability prevention and return to work: toward a common vocabulary for analyzing stakeholders’ actions and interactions. J Bus Ethics. 2014;120(2):237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA). EUnetHTA Joint Action 2, Work Package 8. HTA Core Model® version 3.0 (Pdf). 2016 [cited 2021 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/HTACoreModel3.0-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Statens beredning för medicinsk och social utvärdering [Swedish agency for health technology assessment and assessment of social services]. Implementeringsstöd för psykiatrisk evidens i primärvården: en systematisk litteraturöversikt [implementation of psychiatric guidelines and evidence-based knowledge in the primary care sector]. Stockholm: SBU; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;11(4):589–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk Brämberg E, Sandman L, Hellman T, et al. Facilitators, barriers and ethical values related to the coordination of return-to-work among employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders: a protocol for a qualitative study (the CORE-project). BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e032463. 17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socialförsäkringsbalk [Social Insurance code] (SFS 2010:110). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Arbetsmiljölagen [Work Environment Act] (SFS 1977:1160). Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Hälso- och sjukvårdsförvaltningen. Lägre sjukskrivning med rehabkoordinator: utvärdering och utveckling av rehabkoordinator för patienter med långvarig smärta och/eller lätt medelsvår psykisk ohälsa i Stockholms läns landsting. Stockholm: Stockholms läns landsting; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Patientlag [Patient Act] (SFS: 2014:821). Stockholm: Socialdeparementet; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Juth N. Genetic information – values and rights. The morality of presymptomatic genetic testing [dissertation]. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Patientdatalag [Patient Data Act] (SFS: 2008:355). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• General Data Protection Regulation. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Toth KE, Yvon F, Villotti P, et al. Disclosure dilemmas: how people with a mental health condition perceive and manage disclosure at work. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prioriteringar inom hälso- och sjukvården [Ethical platform for healthcare priority setting] (Proposition 1996/97:60). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hälso- och Sjukvårdslag [The Health and Medical Services Act] (SFS 2017:30). Stockholm: Socialdepartementet; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kalvemark S, Hoglund AT, Hansson MG, et al. Living with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(6):1075–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bognar G. The ethics of healthcare rationing: an introduction. London: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Etuknwa A, Daniels K, Eib C. Sustainable return to work: a systematic review focusing on personal and social factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(4):679–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfit D. Equality or priority? In: Clayton MWA, editor. The ideal of equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002. p. 81–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hirose I. Egalitarianism and prioritarianism. In: Brooks T, editor. New waves in ethics. Basingstoke: McMillan; 2011. p. 88–107.
   Google Scholar
• Diskrimineringslag [Discrimination Act] (2008:567). Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdepartementet; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Langley A, Lindberg K, Mork BE, et al. Boundary work among groups, occupations, and organizations: from cartography to process. ANNALS. 2019;13(2):704–736.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CE. Organizational ethics – a practical approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Svärd V, Friberg E, Azad A. How people with multimorbidity and psychosocial difficulties experience support by rehabilitation coordinators during sickness absence. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:1245–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers E. Social stigma is an underestimated contributing factor to unemployment in people with mental illness or mental health issues: position paper and future directions. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmlund. Return to work: Exploring paths toward work after spinal cord injury and designing a rehabilitation intervention [dissertation]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Davies R, Ives J, Dunn M. A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams EN, Morrow SL. Achieving trustworthiness in qualitative research: a pan-paradigmatic perspective. Psychother Res. 2009;19(4–5):576–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar