Toward a paradigm shift in healthcare: using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the capability approach (CA) jointly in theory and practice

References

• Lim SA, Khorrami A, Wassersug RJ. Twenty years on – has patient-centered care been equally well integrated among medical specialties? Postgrad Med. 2022;134(1):20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, et al. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):600–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti A, Nkhoma K, Petrus R, et al. The empirical evidence underpinning the concept and practice of person-centred care for serious illness: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(12):e003330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore L, Britten N, Lydahl D, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31(4):662–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitty CJM, MacEwen C, Goddard A, et al. Rising to the challenge of multimorbidity. BMJ. 2020;368:l6964.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. ICF. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Bundy A. The ICF has made a difference to functioning and disability measurement and statistics. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(12):1450–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Kostansjek N. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: the first 20 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2021;63(4):363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A. Equality of what? In: McMurrin SM, editor. Tanner lectures on human values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M, Sen A. The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra S. The human development model of disability, health and wellbeing. In: Palgrave Pivot, editor. Disability, health and human development. Palgrave studies in disability and international development. New York: Palgrave Pivot; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell PM, Roberts TE, Barton PM, et al. Applications of the capability approach in the health field: a literature review. Soc Indic Res. 2017;133(1):345–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frahsa A, Abel T, Gelius P, et al. The capability approach as a bridging framework across health promotion settings: theoretical and empirical considerations. Health Promot Int. 2021;36(2):493–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostanjsek N. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a conceptual framework and common language for disability statistics and health information systems. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl. 4):S3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson HG. Problems with the ICIDH definition of impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 1996;18(1):52–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer D. The ICIDH and the need for its revision. Disabil Soc. 1998;13(4):503–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J. Human functioning: developments and grand challenges. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021;1:3.
   Google Scholar
• Madden RH, Glozier N, Fortune N, et al. In search of an integrative measure of functioning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(6):5815–5832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes CR, Maribo T, Stallinga HA, et al. Remodeling of the ICF: a commentary. Disabil Health J. 2021;14(1):100978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerniauskaite M, Quintas R, Boldt C, et al. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2009: its use, implementation and operationalisation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(4):281–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maribo T, Petersen KS, Handberg C, et al. Systematic literature review on ICF from 2001 to 2013 in the Nordic countries focusing on clinical and rehabilitation context. J Clin Med Res. 2016;8(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrer RL, Gonzalez Schlenker C, Lozano Romero R, et al. Advanced primary care in San Antonio: linking practice and community strategies to improve health. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(3):288–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrouwere I, Lebeer J, Prinzie P. The use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in primary care: findings of exploratory implementation throughout life. Disabil CBR Inclus Dev. 2016;27(2):57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Snyman S, Heidi Anttila H, de Camargo OAK, et al. The ICanFunction mHealth solution (mICF): a project bringing equity to health and social care within a person-centered approach. J Interprofess Workforce Res Dev. 2019;2(1):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Moran M, Bickford J, Barradell S, et al. Embedding the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in health professions curricula to enable interprofessional education and collaborative practice. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520933855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstün TB. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule WHODAS 2.0. Geneva, Switserland: World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, et al. A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner WA, Ryser L, Huber E, et al. Use of the ICF model as a clinical problem-solving tool in physical therapy and rehabilitation medicine. Phys Ther. 2002;82(11):1098–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheeseman D, Madden R, Bundy A. Your ideas about participation and environment: a new self-report instrument. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1903–1908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Peter C, Müller R, et al. The personal factors of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in the literature – a systematic review and content analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(13–14):1089–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotkamp S, Cibis W, Brüggemann S, et al. Personal factors classification revisited: a proposal in the light of the biopsychosocial model of the World Health Organization (WHO). Aust J Rehabil Counsel. 2020;26(2):73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelsma J. Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a literature survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson RJ, Lollar D, Björck-Åkesson E, et al. ICF and ICF-CY lessons learned: Pandora's box of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(25):2187–2194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heerkens YF, de Weerd M, Huber M, et al. Reconsideration of the scheme of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: incentives from The Netherlands for a global debate. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(5):603–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trani JF, Bakhshi P, Bellanca N, et al. Disabilities through the capability approach lens: implications for public policies. Alter. 2011;5(3):143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Halligan PW. The biopsychosocial model of illness: a model whose time has come. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(8):995–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi M, Fheodoroff K. Goal setting with ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) and multidisciplinary team approach in stroke rehabilitation. In: Platz T, editor. Clinical pathways in stroke rehabilitation. Cham: Springer. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker D. Sen’s concept of agency. Human Development and Capability Association Conference; New Delhi; 2008. p. 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns I. Wellbeing, freedom and social justice: the capability approach re-examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns I. Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Femin Econ. 2003;9(2–3):61–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire S. Valuing freedoms: Sen's capability approach and poverty reduction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum MC. Women and human development: the capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• van Loon MS, van Leeuwen KM, Ostelo RWJG, et al. Quality of life in a broader perspective: does ASCOT reflect the capability approach? Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1181–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Treating patients as persons: a capabilities approach to support delivery of person-centered care. Am J Bioeth. 2013;13(8):29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer RL, Cruz I, Burge S, et al. Measuring capability for healthy diet and physical activity. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(1):46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruger JP. Health capability: conceptualization and operationalization. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(1):41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López Barreda R, Robertson-Preidler J, Bedregal García P. Health assessment and the capability approach. Glob Bioeth. 2019;30(1):19–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welch Saleeby P. Applying the capabilities approach to disability, poverty, and gender. In: Comim F, Nussbaum MC, editors. Capabilities, gender, equality: towards fundamental entitlements. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2014. p. 308–321.
   Google Scholar
• Anand S, Sen A. Human Development Index: methodology & measurement, occasional paper 12, human development report office. New York: UNDP; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Index; [cited 2021 May 25]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi
   Google Scholar
• Chiappero-Martinetti E, Roche JM. Operationalization of the capability approach, from theory to practice: a review of techniques and empirical applications. In: Chiappero-Martinetti E, editor. Debating global society: reach and limits of the capability approach. Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli; 2009. p. 157–201.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Brazier J, Basarir H. The capability approach: a critical review of its application in health Economics. Value Health. 2016;19(6):795–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J. Reconciling the capability approach and the ICF. Alter. 2014;8(1):10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry C, Welch Saleeby P, Chatterji S, et al. From disability theory to practice: essays in honor of Jerome E. Bickenbach. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra S. Reconciling the capability approach and the ICF: a response. Alter. 2014;8(1):24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Shakespeare T. Remodeling the ICF. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(3):337–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch Saleeby P. Applications of a capability approach to disability and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in social work practice. J Soc Work Disabil Rehabil. 2006;6(1–2):217–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maritz R, Aronsky D, Prodinger B. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in electronic health records. A systematic literature review. Appl Clin Inform. 2017;8(3):964–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO; 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/about/collaboration/collaborating-centres
   Google Scholar
• Stallinga HA, Bakker J, Haan SJ, et al. The usability of the preliminary ICF core set for hospitalized patients after a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from the perspective of nurses: a feasibility study. Front Rehabilit Sci. 2021. DOI:10.3389/fresc.2021.710127
   Google Scholar