The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire (ÖMSQ-12-TR)

References

• Palazzo C, Ravaud JF, Papelard A, et al. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions. PLOS One. 2014;9(3):e90633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, et al. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006–2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demou E, Smith S, Bhaskar A, et al. Evaluating sickness absence duration by musculoskeletal and mental health issues: a retrospective cohort study of Scottish Healthcare Workers. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e018085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaro J, Magalhães J, Leite M, et al. Musculoskeletal injuries and absenteeism among healthcare professionals-ICD-10 characterization. PLOS One. 2018;13(12):e0207837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March L, Smith EUR, Hoy DG, et al. Burden of disability due to musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2014;28(3):353–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu Y-Y. 0243 Screening and disability prevention for musculoskeletal disorders of high-tech industry workers in Taiwan. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(Suppl 1):A92–A92.
   Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–1571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuorinka I, Jonsson B, Kilbom A, et al. Standardised nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987;18(3):233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill JC, Dunn KM, Lewis M, et al. A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(5):632–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiri R, Heliövaara M, Ahola K, et al. A screening tool for the risk of disability retirement due to musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018;44(1):37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Melloh M, Yelland M, et al. Predictive ability of a modified örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):449–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Burkett B, Neller A, et al. Can long-term impairment in general practitioner whiplash patients be predicted using screening and patient-reported outcomes? Int J Rehabil Res. 2008;31(1):79–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel CP, Burkett B, Melloh M. The shortened örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire: evaluation in a work-injured population. Man Ther. 2013;18(5):378–385.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabel CP, Melloh M, Burkett B, et al. The örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire: validation of a modified primary care musculoskeletal screening tool in an acute work injured population. Manual Therapy. 2012;17(6):554–565.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linton SJ, Halldén K. New Zealand acute low back pain guide patient information screening questionnaire 1996. [cited 23 August 2004]. Available from: https://www.healthnavigator.org.nz/media/1006/nz-acute-low-back-pain-guide-acc.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(2):80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderifar M, Goli H, Ghaljaie F, editors. Snowball sampling: a purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. SDME. 2017;14(3):e67670.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz ÖT, Yakut Y, Uygur F, et al. Tampa kinezyofobi ölçeği’nin türkçe versiyonu ve test-tekrar test güvenirliği. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2011;22(1):44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Soylu C, Kütük B. SF-12 yaşam kalitesi ölçeği’nin türkçe formunun güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2022;33(2):108–116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeşilyurt M, Faydalı S. Ağrı değerlendirmesinde tek boyutlu ölçeklerin kullanımı. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;23(3):444–451.
   Google Scholar
• Veirman E, Van Ryckeghem DML, De Paepe A, et al. Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies. Pain Rep. 2019;4(5):e775.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takasaki H, Gabel CP. Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(8):1409–1415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kori S. Kinisophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manage. 1990;3:35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Crombez G, Vlaeyen JW, Heuts PH, et al. Pain-related fear is more disabling than pain itself: evidence on the role of pain-related fear in chronic back pain disability. Pain. 1999;80(1–2):329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl C, Cleland JA. Visual analogue scale, numeric pain rating scale and the McGill pain questionnaire: an overview of psychometric properties. Phys Ther Rev. 2005;10(2):123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. SAS for windows workbook for tabachnick and fidell using multivariate statistics. New York (NY): Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bujang M, Baharum N. Sample size guideline for correlation analysis. World J Soc Sci Res. 2016;3(1):37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bujang M, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci. 2017;12(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2021; 2021. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Revelle W. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA2020; Version = 2.0.12. Available from:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). J Stat Soft. 2012;48(2):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epskamp S. semPlot: Path diagrams and visual analysis of various SEM Packages' Output. R package version 1.1.2. 2019. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot.
   Google Scholar
• Davis L. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res. 1992;5(4):194–197.
   Google Scholar
• Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. EIMJ. 2019;11(2):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hair J, Black W, Babin B, et al. Exploratory factor analysis. In: Multivariate data analysis, 7th pearson new international ed. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update, 2003. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukaka M. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib MM, Yesmin, S, Moniruzzaman  . A pilot study of prevalence and distributions of musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) among paper based office workers in Bangladesh. Work. 2015;50(3):371–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tveter AT, Øiestad BE, Rysstad TL, et al. Risk assessment for prolonged sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders: protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger T, Maher CG, Rieger MA, et al. Work-break schedules for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7(7):CD012886.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, et al. Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(2):165–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yasir A. Cross cultural adaptation & psychometric validation of instruments: step-wise. Int J Psychiatry. 2016;1(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt TA. Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2011;29(4):304–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher MW, Brown TA. Introduction to confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. In: Handbook of Quantitative Methods for Educational Research: Brill Sense. 2013. p. 287–314.
   Google Scholar
• DiStefano C, Hess B. Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: an empirical review. J Psychoeduc Assess. 2005;23(3):225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveri M. [Physical therapy of patients in general practice. role of the main groups of physical therapy methods in acute and chronic problems of the locomotor system]. Schweizerische Rundschau Fur Medizin Praxis = Revue Suisse de Medecine Praxis. 1989;78(11):281–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach's alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. Malays J Med Sci. 2018;25(6):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontitsis A, Pagge J. A simulation approach on cronbach's alpha statistical significance. Math Comput Simul. 2007;73(5):336–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan S, Agrawal R, Bhalerao S. Development of the Hindi version of the Orebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire–12 items-cross cultural adaptation, validity and test–retest reliability in patients with musculoskeletal dysfunction. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther. 2021;15(4):127–135.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4(4):293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Liang MH, Stucki S, et al. Application of statistical graphics to facilitate selection of health status measures for clinical practice and evaluative research. Clin Rheumatol. 1999;18(2):101–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung M, Voss MW, Bounsanga J, et al. Psychometrics of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function instrument administered by computerized adaptive testing and the disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand in the orthopedic elbow patient population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(3):515–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung M, Hon SD, Franklin JD, et al. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS physical function item bank in patients with spinal disorders. Spine. 2014;39:158–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenfeld A, Bastiaenen C, Brunner F, et al. Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuesta-Vargas AI, González-Sánchez M. Spanish version of the screening örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire: a cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, et al. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: a systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):659–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibzadeh F, Habibzadeh P, Yadollahie M. On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results. Biochem Med. 2016;26(3):297–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. Vol. 398. Newyork (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Power M, Fell G, Wright M. Principles for high-quality, high-value testing. Evid Based Med. 2013;18(1):5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar