Imputation of missing values within WHODAS 2.0 data collected from low back pain patients using the response function approach

References

• Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, et al. Developing the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull. World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun TB, Kostanjesek N, Chatterji S, et al. 2010. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43974.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, et al. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2347–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddikoglu D, Doganay Erdogan B, Gokmen D, et al. Sistematik derleme: WHODAS-2.0 ölçeği ile toplanan verilerde kayıp verilerin ele alınma. Yaklaşımlarının incelenmesi. [systematic review: a study of the approaches to treating missing data in the data collected with the WHODAS-2.0 scale]. Ankara Universitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2019;72(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Moen VP, Drageset J, Eide GE, et al. Validation of world health organization assessment schedule 2.0 in specialized somatic rehabilitation services in Norway. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(2):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung MK, Hung AT, Poon PK, et al. Validation of the world health organization assessment schedule II Chinese traditional version (WHODAS II CT) in persons with disabilities and chronic illnesses for Chinese population. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1902–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu T, Yen C, Chou C, et al. Development of traditional Chinese version of world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36 item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2812–2820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösl M, Cieza A, Stucki G. Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(9):1521–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ćwirlej-Sozańska A, Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska A, Sozański B. Validation of the polish version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in an elderly population (60-70 years old. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(3):386–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulug B, Ertugrul A, Gogus A, et al. Yetiyitimi degerlendirme cizelgesinin (WHODAS II) sizofreni hastalarında gecerlilik ve güvenilirligi. Turk Psikiyatr Derg. 2001;12:121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, et al. Validation of the “world health organization disability assessment schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elhan AH, Oztuna D, Kutlay S, et al. An initial application of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) for measuring disability in patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders. 2008;9:166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirtas H, Amatya A, Doganay B. BinNor: an R package for con-current generation of binary and normal data. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2014;43(3):569–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma K, Van der Ark LA. Investigation and treatment of missing item scores in test and questionnaire data. Multivar Behav Res. 2003;38(4):505–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganay Erdogan B, Elhan A, Demirtas H, et al. Multiple imputation of missing values using the response function method based on a data set of the health assessment questionnaire disability index. Turkish J Rheumatol. 2013;28(1):2–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doganay Erdogan B. Assessing the performance of multiple imputation techniques for rasch models with a simulation study. Ankara University, Graduate School of Health Sciences. PhD thesis; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ginkel IR, Van der Ark LA, Sijtsma K. Multiple imputation of item scores in test and questionnaire data, and influence on psychometric results. Multivar Behav Res. 2007;42(2):387–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robitzsch A, Kiefer T, Wu M. 2020. TAM: Test Analysis Modules. R package version 3.5–19, Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach IJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Heidelberg, Berlin, New York: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis K, Sutton D, Bassett S. Sensory modulation for people with anxiety in a community mental health setting. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2018;34(2):122–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koorevaar A, Hegeman J, Lamers F, et al. Big five personality characteristics are associated with depression subtypes and symptom dimensions of depression in older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(12):e132–e140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi A, Leonardi M, Carella F, et al. Impact of nonmotor symptoms on disability in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Int J Rehabil Res. 2011;34(4):316–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holvast F, Burger H, de Waal MM, et al. Loneliness is associated with poor prognosis in late-life depression: longitudinal analysis of The Netherlands study of depression in older persons. J Affect Disord. 2015;185:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnema H, Majo MC, Volker D, et al. Effectiveness of a tailored implementation programme to improve recognition, diagnosis and treatment of anxiety and depression in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C, Narahari SR, Bose KS, et al. Comparison of three quality of life instruments in lymphatic filariasis: DLQI, WHODAS 2.0, and LFSQQ. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(2):e2716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcardle R, Chisolm TH, Abrams HB, et al. The WHO-DAS II: measuring outcomes of hearing aid intervention for adults. Trends Amplif. 2005;9(3):127–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf A, Tate R, Lannin N, et al. The world health organization disability assessment scale, WHODAS II: reliability and validity in the measurement of activity and participation in a spinal cord injury population. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(9):747–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn JH, Ahn SH, Seong SJ, et al. Prevalence, work-loss days and quality of life of community dwelling subjects with depressive symptoms. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(2):280–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi A, Leonardi M, Covelli V, et al. Concordance between severity of disease, prevalence of nonmotor symptoms, patient-reported quality of life and disability and use of medication in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci. 2012;33(4):847–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slim F, Schie CV, Keukenkamp R, et al. Effects of impairments on activities and participation in people affected by leprosy in The Netherlands. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):536–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira C, Souza RT, Costa ML, et al. Validation of the WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0) 12-item tool against the 36-item version for measuring functioning and disability associated with pregnancy and history of severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;141:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. 1998. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford
   Google Scholar
• Allison PD. 2002. Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Wersebe H, Lieb R, Meyer AH, et al. Changes of valued behaviors and functioning during an acceptance and commitment therapy intervention. J Contextual Behavioral Sci. 2017;6(1):63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilera G, Gómez-Benito J, Pino Ó, et al. Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. J Affect Disord. 2015;174:353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilera G, Gómez-Benito J, Pino O, et al. Utility of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;138(2–3):240–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger JE, Ziegler CH. Can auditory and visual speech perception be trained within a group setting? Am J Audiol. 2008;17(1):80–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koumpouros Y, Papageorgiou E, Sakellari E, et al. Adaptation and psychometric properties evaluation of the Greek version of WHODAS 2.0. Pilot application in Greek elderly population. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method. 2018;18(1):63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu S-J, Liou T-H, Yen C-F, et al. Determinants of employment outcome for the people with schizophrenia using the WHODAS 2.0. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29(2):375–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Liou T-H, Chang K-H, et al. Assessment of functioning and disability in patients with schizophrenia using the WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0 in a large-scale database. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018;268(1):65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius LR, van der Klink JJ, de Boer MR, et al. Predictors of functional improvement and future work status after the disability benefit claim: a prospective cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):680–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen A. Health: perception versus observation. Br Med J. 2002;324(7342):860–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaneh B, Saeed-Banadaky SH, Rahaei Z, et al. Disability and self-care among elders in Yazd. Elderly Health J. 2016;2:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming AR, Fairweather JS, Leahy MJ. Quality of life as a potential rehabilitation service outcome. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2013;57(1):9–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen AB, Mikkelsen EM, Cronin-Fenton D, et al. Missing data and multiple imputation in clinical epidemiological research. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar