233
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Keeping it all in balance: a qualitative analysis of the role of balance outcome measurement in physical therapist decision-making and patient outcomes

, ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 3099-3107 | Received 21 Sep 2021, Accepted 25 Aug 2022, Published online: 09 Sep 2022

References

  • Van Peppen RP, Maissan FJ, Van Genderen FR, et al. Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13(4):255–270.
  • Danzl MM, Hunter EG. Perceived value of stroke outcome measures across the post-acute care continuum: a qualitative case study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2013;29(3):202–210.
  • Pattison KM, Brooks D, Cameron JI, et al. Factors influencing physical therapists’ use of standardized measures of walking capacity poststroke across the care continuum. Phys Ther. 2015;95(11):1507–1517.
  • McGinnis PQ, Hack LM, Nixon-Cave K, et al. Factors that influence the clinical decision making of physical therapists in choosing a balance assessment approach. Phys Ther. 2009;89(3):233–247.
  • Potter K, Fulk GD, Salem Y, et al. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part I. Making sound decisions. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35(2):57–64.
  • Sullivan JE, Andrews AW, Lanzino D, et al. Outcome measures in neurological physical therapy practice: part II. A patient-centered process. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011;35(2):65–74.
  • Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–135.
  • Wedge FM, Braswell-Christy J, Brown CJ, et al. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(2):119–133.
  • Commission on Accreditation of Physical Therapy Education. Standards and required elements for accreditation of physical therapist education programs; 2020.
  • Moore JL, Potter K, Blankshain K, et al. A core set of outcome measures for adults with neurologic conditions undergoing rehabilitation: a clinical practice guideline. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2018;42(3):174–220.
  • Andrews AW, Folger SE, Norbet SE, et al. Tests and measures used by specialist physical therapists when examining patients with stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32(3):122–128.
  • Outcome measurement [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2016. [cited 2017 Mar 1]. Available from: www.apta.org/outcomemeasures.
  • Lyon MF, Mitchell K, Medley A, et al. The impact of standardized balance measurement on physical therapist decision-making in acquired brain injury: a survey. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022;[cited 2022 Sep 6];[15 p.]. DOI:10.1080/09593985.2022.2040067.
  • Partridge CJ. The outcome of physiotherapy and its measurement. Physiotherapy 1982;68(11):362–363.
  • Functional measures [Internet]. Baltimare, MD: US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2019. [cited 2020 Sep 1]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Post-Acute-Care-Quality-Initiatives/Functional-Measures-.
  • Sibley KM, Straus SE, Inness EL, et al. Balance assessment practices and use of standardized balance measures among Ontario physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2011;91(11):1583–1591.
  • Beattie P. Measurement of health outcomes in the clinical setting: applications to physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2001;17(3):173–185.
  • ANPT outcome measures recommendations (EDGE): Stroke [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy; 2018. [cited 2019 Jan 3]. Available from: https://www.neuropt.org/practice-resources/neurology-section-outcome-measures-recommendations/stroke.
  • Bland MD, Whitson M, Harris H, et al. Descriptive data analysis examining how standardized assessments are used to guide post-acute discharge recommendations for rehabilitation services after stroke. Phys Ther. 2015;95(5):710–719.
  • Membership matters: FAQ about APTA membership [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2017. [cited 2019 Jan 3]. Available from: https://www.apta.org/MembershipMatters/faq/.
  • ANPT outcome measures recommendations (EDGE): Traumatic brain injury [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2013. [cited 2019 Jan 3]. Available from https://www.neuropt.org/practice-resources/neurology-section-outcome-measures-recommendations/traumatic-brain-injury.
  • Sullivan JE, Crowner BE, Kluding PM, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther. 2013;93(10):1383–1396.
  • Potter K, Cohen ET, Allen DD, et al. Outcome measures for individuals with multiple sclerosis: recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys Ther. 2014;94(5):593–608.
  • Kahn JH, Tappan R, Newman CP, et al. Outcome measure recommendations from the spinal cord injury EDGE task force. Phys Ther. 2016;96(11):1832–1842.
  • McCulloch KL, de Joya AL, Hays K, et al. Outcome measures for persons with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy TBI EDGE task force. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016;40(4):269–280.
  • Reistetter TA, Kuo Y, Karmarkar AM, et al. Geographic and facility variation in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: multilevel analysis of functional status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(7):1248–1254.
  • Bell N, Kidanie T, Cai B, et al. Geographic variation in outpatient health care service utilization after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):341–346.
  • Wainwright SF, Shepard KF, Harman LB, et al. Novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians: a comparison of how reflection is used to inform the clinical decision-making process. Phys Ther. 2010;90(1):75–88.
  • Osborne JA. Documentation for physical therapist practice; 2016.
  • Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, et al. Traumatic brain injury–related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(9):1–16.
  • Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Epidemiology and rehabilitation [Internet]. Atlanta, (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015 [cited 2017 May 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/TBI_Report_to_Congress_Epi_and_Rehab-a.pdf.
  • Hillier SL, Sharpe MH, Metzer J. Outcomes 5 years post traumatic brain injury (with further reference to neurophysical impairment and disability). Brain Inj. 1997;11(9):661–675.
  • Garland SJ, Ivanova TD, Mochizuki G. Recovery of standing balance and health-related quality of life after mild or moderately severe stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):218–227.
  • Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86(1):30–38.
  • Basford JR, Chou L, Kaufman KR, et al. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(3):343–349.
  • Howe JA, Inness EL, Venturini A, et al. The community balance and mobility scale-a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(10):885–895.
  • Williams G, Willmott C. Higher levels of mobility are associated with greater societal participation and better quality-of-life. Brain Inj. 2012;26(9):1065–1071.
  • Michael KM, Allen JK, Macko RF. Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Archiv Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1552–1556.
  • Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2015.
  • Harting J, Rutten GM, Rutten ST, et al. A qualitative application of the diffusion of innovations theory to examine determinants of guideline adherence among physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2009;89(3):221–232.
  • Zanca JM, Dijkers MP. Describing what we do: a qualitative study of clinicians’ perspectives on classifying rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(1 Suppl):S55–S65.e2.
  • Payne G, Payne J. Key concepts in social research. London: Sage; 2004.
  • Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2016.
  • Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(3):214–222.
  • Rehabilitation measures database [Internet]. Shirley Ryan. AbilityLab [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures.
  • Huhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, et al. Clinical reasoning in physical therapy: a concept analysis. Phys Ther. 2019;99(4):440–456.
  • Edwards I, Jones M, Carr J, et al. Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2004;84(4):312–330.
  • Baker SE, Painter EE, Morgan BC, et al. Systematic clinical reasoning in physical therapy (SCRIPT): tool for the purposeful practice of clinical reasoning in orthopedic manual physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2017;97(1):61–70.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.