Integrating an approach to personalised self-management support in stroke and neurorehabilitation service contexts: People1st – a quality improvement initiative

References

• Stroke Association, UK. State of the Nation Stroke Statistics; 2017. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/sites/default/files/state_of_the_nation_2017_final_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bonifacio GB, Ward NS, Emsley HCA, et al. Optimising rehabilitation and recovery after a stroke. Pract Neurol. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• NHS England. NHS long term plan; 2019. Available from: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/
   Google Scholar
• NHS England. NHS universal personalised care: implementing the comprehensive model; 2019. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/universal-personalised-care.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lazcano-Ponce E, Angeles-Llerenas A, Rodríguez-Valentín R, et al. Communication patterns in the doctor–patient relationship: evaluating determinants associated with low paternalism in Mexico. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad N, Ellins E, Krelle H, et al. Person-centred care: from ideas to action. London (UK): The Health Foundation; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk-de Vries A, van Dongen JJJ, van Bokhoven MA. Sustainable interprofessional teamwork needs a team-friendly healthcare system: experiences from a Collaborative Dutch Programme. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(2):167–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulnik ST, Postges H, Brimicombe L, et al. Implementing an interprofessional model of self-management support across a community workforce: a mixed-methods evaluation study. J Interprof Care. 2017;31(1):75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, McKevitt C, Riazi A, et al. How is rehabilitation with and without an integrated self-management approach perceived by UK community-dwelling stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation to explore implementation and contextual variations. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e014109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington K, Simpson SA, Craig P, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council Guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau R, Stevenson F, Ong BN, et al. Achieving change in primary care—effectiveness of strategies for improving implementation of complex interventions: systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddlestone L, Turner J, Eborall H, et al. Application of normalisation process theory in understanding implementation processes in primary care settings in the UK: systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble C, Grealish L, Teodorczuk A, et al. How can end of life care excellence be normalised in hospitals? Lessons from a qualitative framework study. BMC Palliat Care. 2018;17(1):100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glynn LG, Glynn F, Casey M, et al. Implementation of the SMART MOVE intervention in primary care: a qualitative study using normalisation process theory. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NHS England. Next steps on the NHS five-year forward view; 2017. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/NEXT-STEPS-ON-THE-NHS-FIVE-YEAR-FORWARD-VIEW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reeves S. Ideas for the development of the interprofessional education and practice field: an update. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(4):405–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluation training programs: the four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–554.
   Google Scholar
• Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones F, Gage H, Drummond A, et al. Feasibility study of an integrated stroke self-management programme: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e008900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä P, Gawned S, Jones F. Starting early: integration of self-management support into an acute stroke service. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014;3(1).
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä P, Jones F, de Sousa de Abreu MI, et al. Supporting self‐management after traumatic brain injury: codesign and evaluation of a new intervention across a trauma pathway. Health Expect. 2019;22(4):632–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. Worth publishers; 1997. ISBN: 10: 0716728508
   Google Scholar
• Miech EJ, Rattray NA, Flanagan ME, et al. Inside help: an integrative review of champions in healthcare-related implementation. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6.
   Google Scholar
• Duprez V, Vandecasteele T, Verhaeghe S, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to enhance self-management support competencies in the nursing profession: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(8):1807–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch TL, Girling M, May CR, et al. Nomad: implementation measure based on normalization process theory [measurement instrument]; 2015. Available from: http://www.normalizationprocess.org
   Google Scholar
• Adler P, Adler P. Membership roles in field research. Newbury Park: Sage; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Robert G, MacFarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organisations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Thompson-Leduc P. Twelve myths about shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(3):281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris M, Kilbride C. From dictatorship to a reluctant democracy: stroke therapists talking about self-management. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(1):32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makela P. Contaminating data with theory to reimagine support for ‘self-management’. Sociol Rev. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge S, Kayes N, McPherson K. Who is in control? Clinicians’ view on their role in self-management approaches: a qualitative metasynthesis. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):e007413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo M, Goodyear-Smith FA, Weller J, et al. Healthcare practitioners’ personal and professional values. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2016;21(2):257–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell & Fitzsimmons. Behind closed doors. London (UK): Point of Care Foundation; 2017.
   Google Scholar