Reliability and validity of the public transportation use assessment form for individuals after stroke

References

• Julien D, Richard L, Gauvin L, et al. Transit use and walking as potential mediators of the association between accessibility to services and amenities and social participation among urban-dwelling older adults: insights from the VoisiNuAge study. J Transport Health. 2015;2(1):35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowsky C, Olofsson A, Nyman A, et al. Patterns of participation: facilitating and hindering aspects related to places for activities outside the home after stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(3):204–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel K, Ståhl A, Risberg J, et al. Post-stroke functional limitations and changes in use of mode of transport. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17(2):162–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finestone HM, Marshall SC, Rozenberg D, et al. Differences between poststroke drivers and nondrivers: demographic characteristics, medical status, and transportation use. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(11):904–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogawa M, Sawada T, Ishizuki C, et al. Reasons for the lack of practice using public transportation at sub-acute rehabilitation hospitals in a Japanese urban community. Asian J Occup Ther. 2016;12(1):67–74.
   Google Scholar
• Risser R, Iwarsson S, Ståhl A. How do people with cognitive functional limitations post-stroke manage the use of buses in local public transport? Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2012;15(2):111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HF, Wu CY, Lin KC, et al. Rasch validation of a combined measure of basic and extended daily life functioning after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27(2):125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson HC, Selander H. Transport mobility 5 years after stroke in an urban setting. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2018;25(3):180–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkvist J, Risser R, Iwarsson S, et al. The challenge of using public transport: descriptions by people with cognitive functional limitations. J Transp Land Use. 2018;2(1):65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Asplund K, Wallin S, Jonsson F. Use of public transport by stroke survivors with persistent disability. Scand J Disabil Res. 2012;14(4):289–299.
   Google Scholar
• Logan PA, Gladman JRF, Radford KA. The use of transport by stroke patients. Br J Occup Ther. 2001;64(5):261–264.
   Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, et al. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13(3):43–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer JH, Wang E, Smith D. Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(2):315–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl A, Månsson Lexell E. Facilitators for travelling with local public transport among people with mild cognitive limitations after stroke. Scand J Occup Ther. 2018;25(2):108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushizawa K, Otaka Y, Kitamura S, et al. Development of an assessment form for the performance of public transportation use in individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments; 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 8]. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miyai I, Sonoda S, Nagai S, et al. Results of new policies for inpatient rehabilitation coverage in Japan. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(6):540–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summary of medical treatment fee revision in 2016. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Health Insurance Bureau, Medical Economics Division; 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 26]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-12400000-Hokenkyoku/0000115977.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chiba Prefectural Government. Report on the Chiba prefecture monthly population survey, 2017; 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 3]. Available from: https://www.pref.chiba.lg.jp/toukei/toukeidata/joujuu/nenpou/2017/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Kanto Regional Development Bureau. Result of survey of Tokyo metropolitan area personal trip; 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.tokyo-pt.jp/static/hp/file/press/1127press.pdf
   Google Scholar
• East Japan Railway Company; 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.jreast.co.jp/e/
   Google Scholar
• Keisei Electric Railway; 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 20]. Available from: https://www.keisei.co.jp/
   Google Scholar
• Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, et al. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS) – a new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med. 1994;31(2):119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, et al. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). In Chino N, Melvin JL eds,: Functional evaluation of stroke patients. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag; 1996. p. 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Data Management Service of the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation and the Center for Functional Assessment Research. Guide for use of the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation including the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), version. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990;12(1):6–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(11):1018–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can. 1989;41(6):304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Mao HF, Hsueh IP, Tang PF, et al. Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1022–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji T, Liu M, Sonoda S, et al. The Stroke Impairment Assessment Set: its internal consistency and predictive validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(7):863–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohs SC. The block-design tests. J Exp Psychol. 1920;3(5):357–376.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke. 2005;36(9):100–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, et al. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(5):400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, et al. The Frenchay Activities Index: assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993;24(8):1173–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker SJ, Rudd AG, Douiri A, et al. Comparison of 2 extended activities of daily living scales with the Barthel index and predictors of their outcomes: cohort study within the South London Stroke Register (SLSR). Stroke. 2012;43(5):1362–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(12):1226–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, et al. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(2):188–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford JP. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P, et al. Measuring participation after stroke: a review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1):177–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KC, Chen HF, Wu CY, et al. Multi dimensional Rasch validation of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients receiving rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(1):58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piercy M, Carter J, Mant J, et al. Inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in patients with stroke and their carers. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(4):433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post MWM, de Witte LP. Good inter-rater reliability of the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(5):548–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel KA, Ståhl A, Iwarsson S. Inter-rater agreement of a modified and extended Swedish version of the Frenchay Activities Index (FAI). Eur J Ageing. 2013;10(3):247–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Duckett SJ, Duncombe D, et al. Validity of the AusTOM scales: a comparison of the AusTOMs and EuroQol-5D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2(1):64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chase S, Ratcliff G, Hoesch K. Functional Assessment of Cognitive Transit Skills: FACTS: guidelines for production, administration and scoring; 1996 [cited 2021 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.nadtc.org/wp-content/uploads/634712790936203900_Functional_Assessment_Co.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Szary P, Feeley C. Development of a Transportation Skills Assessment Tool (TSAT) for individuals with autistic spectrum disorder to aid in finding safe and accessible paratransit services. Final report. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; 2012.
   Google Scholar