The use of virtual reality in the rehabilitation of aphasia: a systematic review

References

• Berg K, Isaksen J, Wallace SJ, et al. Establishing consensus on a definition of aphasia: an e-Delphi study of international aphasia researchers. Aphasiology. 2022;36(4):385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Lyden P, Brady M, et al. Aphasia and dysarthria in acute stroke: recovery and functional outcome. Int J Stroke. 2015;10(3):400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code C, Petheram B. Delivering for aphasia. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011;13(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Association. State of the nation: stroke statistics [cited 2019 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.stroke.org.uk/resources/state-nation-stroke-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) post-acute organisational audit; 2015. Available from: https://www.strokeaudit.org/Documents/National/PostAcuteOrg/2015/2015-PAOrgGenericReportPhase2.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Northcott S, Hilari K. Why do people lose their friends after a stroke?: friendship loss post stroke. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(5):524–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Ryan B, Hudson K, et al. Reducing the psychosocial impact of aphasia on mood and quality of life in people with aphasia and the impact of caregiving in family members through the aphasia action success knowledge (aphasia ASK) program: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell EY, Waite LJ. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. J Health Soc Behav. 2009;50(1):31–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House JS. Social isolation kills, but how and why? Psychosom Med. 2001;63(2):273–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brummett BH, Barefoot JC, Siegler IC, et al. Characteristics of socially isolated patients with coronary artery disease who are at elevated risk for mortality. Psychosom Med. 2001;63(2):267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie N, Cherney LR. Aphasia in North america: highlights of a white paper. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(10):e117.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42407
   Google Scholar
• Wisenburn B, Mahoney K. A meta-analysis of word-finding treatments for aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(11):1338–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehri A, Jalaie S. A systematic review on methods of evaluate sentence production deficits in agrammatic aphasia patients: validity and reliability issues. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(9):885–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper L, Marshall J, Boyle M, et al. Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base. Aphasiology. 2021;35(9):1125–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson R, Wielaert S. Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1 Suppl):70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton S, Lane K, Shiggins C. Supporting communication for people with aphasia in stroke rehabilitation: transfer of training in a multidisciplinary stroke team. Aphasiology. 2016;30(5):629–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrubsole K, Lin T, Burton C, et al. Delivering an iterative communication partner training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: a pilot implementation study and process evaluation. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021;56(3):620–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauhanen M, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen P, et al. Domains and determinants of quality of life after stroke caused by brain infarction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(12):1541–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Northcott S, Roy P, et al. Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: the first six months. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(2):181–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Needle JJ, Harrison KL. What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(1):S86–S95.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K. The impact of stroke: are people with aphasia different to those without? Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(3):211–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam JMC, Wodchis WP. The relationship of 60 disease diagnoses and 15 conditions to preference-based health-related quality of life in Ontario hospital-based long-term care residents. Med Care. 2010;48(4):380–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall L, Sherratt S, Rogers P, et al. What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology. 2011;25(3):309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doedens W, Meteyard L. The importance of situated language use for aphasia rehabilitation. PsyArXiv. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Doedens WJ, Meteyard L. What is functional communication? A theoretical framework for real-world communication applied to aphasia rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rev. 2022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Dictionary [cited 2021 Apr 13]. Available from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/virtual-reality
   Google Scholar
• Thomas M, Cinganotto L, Heike P. Digital game-based language learning in 3D immersive environments: the GUINEVERE project. Innovation in Language Learning, International Conference; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, et al. Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2006;243(3):291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant L, Brunner M, Hemsley B. A review of virtual reality technologies in the field of communication disability: implications for practice and research. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):365–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y, Lin H, Yang Y. Players’ value structure in digital games. Games Cult. 2017;12(1):72–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns P, Power C, Barlet M, et al. Enabled players: the value of accessible digital games. Games Cult. 2021;16(2):262–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarwood J. The most beautiful video games inspired by famous artists [cited 2021 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.vice.com/en/article/qbxm9d/the-most-beautiful-video-games-inspired-by-famous-artists-211
   Google Scholar
• Mekbib DB, Han J, Zhang L, et al. Virtual reality therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Brain Inj. 2020;34(4):456–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamians R, Proffitt R, Kline D, et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality- and gaming-based interventions for upper extremity rehabilitation poststroke: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(5):885–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghai S, Ghai I, Lamontagne A. Virtual reality training enhances gait poststroke: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1478(1):18–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu F, Lin S, et al. Effects of virtual reality rehabilitation training on cognitive function and activities of daily living of patients with poststroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;103(7):1422–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You SH, Jang SH, Kim Y-H, et al. Virtual reality–induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1166–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, et al. Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy. PLOS One. 2014;9(3):e93318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aminov A, Rogers JM, Middleton S, et al. What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt Murphy M, Resteghini C, Feys P, et al. An overview of systematic reviews on upper extremity outcome measures after stroke. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palma G, Freitas T, Bonuzzi G, et al. Effects of virtual reality for stroke individuals based on the international classification of functioning and health: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;24(4):269–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Huang X, Zhang B, et al. Effects of virtual reality in post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(12):5249–5259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picano C, Quadrini A, Pisano F, et al. Adjunctive approaches to aphasia rehabilitation: a review on efficacy and safety. Brain Sci. 2021;11(1):41.
   Google Scholar
• Repetto C, Paolillo MP, Tuena C, et al. Innovative technology-based interventions in aphasia rehabilitation: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2020;35:12, 1623–1646.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Booth T, Devane N, et al. Evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(8):e0160381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grechuta K, Bellaster BR, Munne RE, et al. The effects of silent visuomotor cueing on word retrieval in Broca’s aphasies: a pilot study. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017;2017:193–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grechuta K, Ballester B, Munne R, et al. Augmented dyadic therapy boosts recovery of language function in patients with nonfluent aphasia. Stroke. 2019;50(5):1270–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragher M, Steel G, Talbot R, et al. Adapting therapy for a new world: storytelling therapy in EVA park. Aphasiology. 2021;35(5):704–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Devane N, Edmonds L, et al. Delivering word retrieval therapies for people with aphasia in a virtual communication environment. Aphasiology. 2018;32(9):1054–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall J, Devane N, Talbot R, et al. A randomised trial of social support group intervention for people with aphasia: a novel application of virtual reality. PLOS One. 2020;15(9):e0239715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grechuta K, Rubio B, Duff A, et al. Intensive language-action therapy in virtual reality for a rehabilitation gaming system. J Pain Manage. 2016;9(3):243–254.
   Google Scholar
• Grechuta K, Rubio Ballester B, Espín Munné R, et al. Multisensory cueing facilitates naming in aphasia. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020;17(1):122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maresca G, Maggio MG, Latella D, et al. Toward improving poststroke aphasia: a pilot study on the growing use of telerehabilitation for the continuity of care. J Stoke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(10):104303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giachero A, Calati M, Pia L, et al. Conversational therapy through semi-immersive virtual reality environments for language recovery and psychological well-being in post stroke aphasia. Behav Neurol. 2020;2020:2846046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Chen P, Li X, et al. Clinical research on therapeutic effect of virtual reality technology on Broca aphasia patients. In: 2nd International Conference on Information Technology (INCIT); 2017 November. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29(4):353–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. The western aphasia battery–revised (WAB-R). Pearson; 2007. doi: 10.1037/t15168-000.
   Google Scholar
• Holland A, Frattali C, Fromm D. Communication activities of daily living-2. Austin (TX): Pro-Ed; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Le Dorze G, et al. Many ways of measuring: a scoping review of measurement instruments for use with people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2022;36(4):401–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley AM, Szikszay TM, Lin C-C, et al. A systematic review of the measurement properties and usage of the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDRO) scale. Physiotherapy. 2015;101:e1043.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Rosenkoetter U, Wakim D, et al. Risk of bias in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale: an expanded manual for the critical appraisal of single-case reports. Sydney: PsycBITE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Perdices M, Tate RL, Rosenkoetter U. An algorithm to evaluate methodological rigor and risk of bias in single-case studies. Behav Modif. 2019:014544551986303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, et al. Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: the 15-item risk of bias in N-of-1 trials (RoBiNT) scale. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(5):619–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Occupational Therapy Association. Guidelines for systematic reviews [cited 2022 Jan 14]. Available from: https://ajot.submit2aota.org/journals/ajot/forms/systematic_reviews.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323(7303):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Graziosi S, Brunton J, et al. EPPI-reviewer: advanced software for systematic reviews, maps and evidence synthesis. EPPI-Centre software. London: UCL Social Research Institute; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hartholt A, Traum D, Marsella S, et al. All together now, introducing the virtual human toolkit. Conference: Intelligent Virtual Agents; 2013. p. 368.
   Google Scholar
• Carragher M, Sage K, Conroy P. Preliminary analysis from a novel treatment targeting the exchange of new information within storytelling for people with nonfluent aphasia and their partners. Aphasiology. 2015;29(11):1383–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Braun EJ, Lee JB, et al. Optimising recovery in aphasia: learning following exposure to a single dose of computer-based script training. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;21(5):448–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Lee JB, Kim KA, et al. Web-based oral reading for language in aphasia (Web ORLA®): a pilot randomized control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(7):976–987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinyak-Fliszar M, Martin N, Keshner E, et al. Using virtual technology to promote functional communication in aphasia: preliminary evidence from interactive dialogues with human and virtual clinicians. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24(4):S974–S989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell S, Martin N, Keshner EA. Engagement with a virtual clinician encourages gesture usage in speakers with aphasia. International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation; 2017. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson C, Choy JJ, Holland A, et al. Sentactics®: computer-automated treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology. 2010;24(10):1242–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartholt A, Traum D, Marsella S, et al. All together now, introducing the virtual human toolkit. Conference: Intelligent Virtual Agents; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Girvan C. What is a virtual world? definition and classification. Education Tech Research Dev. 2018;66(5):1087–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandino L, Binder JR, Desai RH, et al. Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: a framework for embodied semantics. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(5):2018–2034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1993;36(2):338–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Druks J, Masterson J. An object and action naming battery. Hove: Psychology Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Huber W, Poeck K, Willmes K. The aachen aphasia test. Adv Neurol. 1984;42:291–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lea & Febiger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• De Renzi E, Vignolo LA. The token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain. 1962;85:665–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts LL, Hurwitz R, Lee JB, et al. Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;20(2):274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth A, Perkins L. Conversation analysis profile for people with aphasia (CAPPA). London: Whurr Publishers Ltd; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). TAD. 2002;14(3):107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(7):1621–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brumfitt SM, Sheeran P. The development and validation of the Visual Analogue Self-Esteem Scale (VASES). Br J Clin Psychol. 1999;38(4):387–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Babbitt EM, Semik P, et al. Psychometric properties of the communication confidence rating scale for aphasia (CCRSA): phase 1. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benaim C, Cailly B, Perennou D, et al. Validation of the aphasic depression rating scale. Stroke. 2004;35(7):1692–1696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. The world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL). Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2012. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-HIS-HSI-Rev.2012.03
   Google Scholar
• Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2012;78(3):155–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hilari K, Byng S, Lamping DL, et al. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke. 2003;34(8):1944–1950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf C, Caute A, Haigh Z, et al. A comparison of remote therapy, face to face therapy and an attention control intervention for people with aphasia: a quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(4):359–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds LA, Nadeau SE, Kiran S. Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(3):402–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Difrancesco S, Pulvermüller F, Mohr B. Intensive language-action therapy (ILAT): the methods. Aphasiology. 2012;26(11):1317–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Halper AS, Holland AL, et al. Computerized script training for aphasia: preliminary results. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17(1):19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney LR, Merbitz CT, Grip JC. Efficacy of oral reading in aphasia treatment outcome. Rehabil Lit. 1986;47(5–6):112–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shadden BB, Agan JP. Renegotiation of identity: the social context of aphasia support groups. Top Lang Disord. 2004;24(3):174–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland AL, Nelson RL, Goldberg SA. Counselling in communication disorders: a wellness perspective. 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Plural Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Attard MC, Lanyon L, Togher L, et al. Consumer perspectives on community aphasia groups: a narrative literature review in the context of psychological well-being. Aphasiology. 2015;29(8):983–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman MEP, Steen TA, Park N, et al. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of interventions. Am Psychol. 2005;60(5):410–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konnerup U. Renegotiation of self after a brain injury using immersive virtual environments: a contribution to technology-mediated speech therapy. Denmark: Aalborg University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hall N, Boisvert M, Steele R. Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: a systematic review. Int J Telerehabil. 2013;5(1):27–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer R, Enderby P, Paterson G. Using computers to enable self-management of aphasia therapy exercises for word finding: the patient and carer perspective. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013;48(5):508–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Dimairo M, Cooper C, et al. Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(9):821–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Roches CA, Kiran S. Technology-based rehabilitation to improve communication after acquired brain injury. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaya A, Woolf C, Devane N, et al. Receiving aphasia intervention in a virtual environment: the participants’ perspective. Aphasiology. 2018;32(5):538–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliers JR, Wilson S, Marshall J, et al. Experiencing EVA park, a multi-user virtual world for people with aphasia. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cole T, Gillies M. Thinking and doing: challenge, agency, and the eudaimonic experience in video games. Games Cult. 2021;16(2):187–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns P, Cox A, Nordin AI. Immersion in digital games: review of gaming experience research. In: Angelides MC, Angelides MC, Agius H, Agius H, editors. Handbook of digital games. 1st ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2014. p. 337–361.
   Google Scholar
• Maples-Keller J, Bunnell BE, Kim S, et al. The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2017;25(3):103–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(2):180–185. doi: 10.1177/1747493018806200.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. Report from ROMA: an update on the development of a core outcome set for aphasia research. Aphasiology. 2018;32(sup1):241–242.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SJ, Worrall L, Rose T, et al. Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study. Aphasiology. 2017;31(6):643–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper LT, Franklin S, De Aguiar V, et al. An umbrella review of aphasia intervention description in research: the AsPIRE project. Aphasiology. 2022;36(4):467–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaccavento S, Falcone R, Cellamare F, et al. Effects of computer-based therapy versus therapist-mediated therapy in stroke-related aphasia: pilot non-inferiority study. J Commun Disord. 2021;94:106158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster J, Whitworth A, Morris J. Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. Aphasiology. 2015;29(11):1240–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caute A, Cruice M, Devane N, et al. Delivering group support for people with aphasia in a virtual world: experiences of service providers. Disabil Rehabil. 2021;28:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassel S, Power E, Campbell A, et al. Recommendations for the design and implementation of virtual reality for acquired brain injury rehabilitation: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e26344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams K, Moffatt K, McCall D, et al. Designing conversation cues on a head-worn display to support persons with aphasia. In: CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2015; ACM. p. 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health England. Briefing document: first incidence of stroke. London: PHE Publications; 2018. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/678444/Stroke_incidence_briefing_document_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. The impact of aphasia on internet and technology use. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(21):2986–2996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar