3,992
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitations

A scoping review of the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of physiotherapy delivered remotely

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3961-3977 | Received 01 May 2022, Accepted 16 Oct 2022, Published online: 02 Nov 2022

References

  • Bettger JP, Thoumi A, Marquevich V, et al. COVID-19: maintaining essential rehabilitation services across the care continuum. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5):e002670.
  • Adhikari SP, Dev R, Sandborgh M. Alternatives to routinely used physiotherapy interventions for achieving maximum patients’ benefits and minimising therapists’ exposure in treatment of COVID-19–a commentary. Europ J Physioth. 2020;22(6):373–378.
  • Russell TG. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(5):217–220.
  • Booth S, Kendall M. Benefits and challenges of providing transitional rehabilitation services to people with spinal cord injury from regional, rural and remote locations. Aust J Rural Health. 2007;15(3):172–178.
  • Field PE, Franklin RC, Barker RN, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation services for people in rural and remote areas: an integrative literature review. Rural Remote Health. 2018;18(4):4738.
  • Taylor S, Ellis I, Gallagher M. Patient satisfaction with a new physiotherapy telephone service for back pain patients. Physiotherapy. 2002;88(11):645–657.
  • Joseph C, Morrissey D, Abdur-Rahman M, et al. Musculoskeletal triage: a mixed methods study, integrating systematic review with expert and patient perspectives. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(4):277–289.
  • Enock L, Saad M, McLean S. Is telephone triage an effective and feasible form of treatment within physiotherapy outpatient settings? A systematic review. Int J Ther Rehab. 2014;21(Sup7):S2–S3.
  • Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–146.
  • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
  • Grona SL, Bath B, Busch A, et al. Use of videoconferencing for physical therapy in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):341–355.
  • Shukla H, Nair SR, Thakker D. Role of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee arthroplasty: evidence from a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):339–346.
  • Bini SA, Mahajan J. Clinical outcomes of remote asynchronous telerehabilitation are equivalent to traditional therapy following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized control study. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(2):239–247.
  • Bettger JP, Green CL, Holmes DN, et al. Effects of virtual exercise rehabilitation in-home therapy compared with traditional care after total knee arthroplasty: VERITAS, a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg. 2020;102(2):101–109.
  • Levinger P, Hallam K, Fraser D, et al. A novel web-support intervention to promote recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Phys Ther Sport. 2017;27:29–37.
  • Correia FD, Nogueira A, Magalhães I, et al. Home-based rehabilitation with a novel digital biofeedback system versus conventional in-person rehabilitation after total knee replacement: a feasibility study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–2.
  • Malliaras P, Merolli M, Williams CM, et al. It’s not hands-on therapy, so it’s very limited’: Telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculosk Sci Pract. 2021;52:102340.
  • Hoogland J, Wijnen A, Munsterman T, et al. Feasibility and patient experience of a home-based rehabilitation program driven by a tablet app and mobility monitoring for patients after a total hip arthroplasty. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(1):e10342.
  • Boissy P, Tousignant M, Moffet H, et al. Conditions of use, reliability, and quality of audio/video-mediated communications during in-home rehabilitation tele-treatment for post knee arthroplasty. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(8):637–649.
  • Cottrell MA, Hill AJ, O'Leary SP, et al. Patients are willing to use telehealth for the multidisciplinary management of chronic musculoskeletal conditions: a cross-sectional survey. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(7):445–452.
  • Martinez de la Cal J, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, et al. Physical therapists’ opinion of E-Health treatment of chronic low back pain. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2021 02;18(4):16–19.
  • Abramsky H, Kaur P, Robitaille M, et al. Patients’ perspectives on and experiences of home exercise programmes delivered with a mobile application. Physiother Can. 2018;70(2):171–178.
  • Tchero H, Tabue-Teguo M, Lannuzel A, et al. Telerehabilitation for stroke survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(10):e10867.
  • Laver KE, Adey-Wakeling Z, Crotty M, et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;1:CD010255.
  • Ramage ER, Fini N, Lynch EA, et al. Look before you leap: Interventions supervised via telehealth involving activities in weight-bearing or standing positions for people after stroke-a scoping review. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab073.
  • Burridge JH, Lee AC, Turk R, et al. Telehealth, wearable sensors, and the internet: will they improve stroke outcomes through increased intensity of therapy, motivation, and adherence to rehabilitation programs? J Neurologic Phys Ther. 2017;41:S32–S38.
  • Yang CL, Waterson S, Eng JJ. Implementation and evaluation of the virtual graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP) for individuals with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic and Beyond. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab083.
  • Held JP, Ferrer B, Mainetti R, et al. Autonomous rehabilitation at stroke patients’ home for balance and gait: safety, usability and compliance of a virtual reality system. Europ J Phys Rehab Med. 2018;54(4):545–553.
  • Kizony R, Weiss PL, Harel S, et al. Tele-rehabilitation service delivery journey from prototype to robust in-home use. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1532–1540.
  • Tyagi S, Lim DS, Ho WH, et al. Acceptance of tele-rehabilitation by stroke patients: perceived barriers and facilitators. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(12):2472–2477.e2.
  • Muller I, Kirby S, Yardley L. Understanding patient experiences of self-managing chronic dizziness: a qualitative study of booklet-based vestibular rehabilitation, with or without remote support. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):e007680.
  • Cox NS, Dal Corso S, Hansen H, et al. Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;1:CD013040.
  • Bonnevie T, Smondack P, Elkins M, et al. Advanced telehealth technology improves home-based exercise therapy for people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2021;67(1):27–40.
  • Hansen H, Bieler T, Beyer N, et al. Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: a randomised multicentre trial. Thorax. 2020;75(5):413–421.
  • Godtfredsen N, Frolich A, Bieler T, et al. 12-Months follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation: a multicentre randomised clinical trial in patients with severe COPD. Respir Med. 2020;172:106129.
  • Cerdán-de-Las-Heras J, Balbino F, Løkke A, et al. Effect of a new tele-rehabilitation program versus standard rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JCM. 2021;11(1):11.
  • Cerdan-de-Las-Heras J, Balbino F, Lokke A, et al. Tele-rehabilitation program in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-a single-center randomized trial. Int J Environ Res Pub Health. 2021;18(19):10016.
  • Hoaas H, Andreassen HK, Lien LA, et al. Adherence and factors affecting satisfaction in long-term telerehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016;16(1):1–4.
  • Zanaboni P, Hoaas H, Aarøen Lien L, et al. Long-term exercise maintenance in COPD via telerehabilitation: a two-year pilot study. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(1):74–82.
  • Paneroni M, Colombo F, Papalia A, et al. Is telerehabilitation a safe and viable option for patients with COPD? A feasibility study. COPD: J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2015;12(2):217–225.
  • Marquis N, Larivée P, Saey D, et al. In-home pulmonary telerehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a pre-experimental study on effectiveness, satisfaction, and adherence. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(11):870–879.
  • Inskip JA, Lauscher HN, Li LC, et al. Patient and health care professional perspectives on using telehealth to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis. 2018;15(1):71–80.
  • Knox L, Gemine R, Dunning M, et al. Reflexive thematic analysis exploring stakeholder experiences of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation (VIPAR). BMJ Open Resp Res. 2021;8(1):e000800.
  • Rawstorn JC, Gant N, Direito A, et al. Telehealth exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(15):1183–1192.
  • Subedi N, Rawstorn JC, Gao L, et al. Implementation of telerehabilitation interventions for the self-management of cardiovascular disease: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(11):e17957.
  • Kikuchi A, Taniguchi T, Nakamoto K, et al. Feasibility of home-based cardiac rehabilitation using an integrated tele-rehabilitation platform in elderly patients with heart failure: a pilot study. J Cardiol. 2021;78(1):66–71.
  • Laustsen S, Oestergaard LG, van Tulder M, et al. Telemonitored exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation improves physical capacity and health-related quality of life. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(1-2):36–44.
  • Rawstorn JC, Gant N, Rolleston A, et al. End users want alternative intervention delivery models: usability and acceptability of the REMOTE-CR exercise-based cardiac telerehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(11):2373–2377.
  • O'Doherty AF, Humphreys H, Dawkes S, et al. How has technology been used to deliver cardiac rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic? An international cross-sectional survey of healthcare professionals conducted by the BACPR. BMJ Open. 2021;11(4):e046051.
  • Miller MJ, Pak SS, Keller DR, et al. Evaluation of pragmatic telehealth physical therapy implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Ther. 2021;101(1):pzaa193.
  • Albahrouh SI, Buabbas AJ. Physiotherapists’ perceptions of and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Kuwait during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21(1):122.
  • Cox NS, Scrivener K, Holland AE, et al. COVID-19: a feasibility study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(4):789–795.
  • Reynolds A, Awan N, Gallagher P. Physiotherapists’ perspective of telehealth during the Covid-19 pandemic. Int J Med Inform. 2021;156:104613.
  • Hall JB, Luechtefeld JT, Woods ML. Adoption of telehealth by pediatric physical therapists during COVID-19: a survey study. Paediatr Phys Ther. 2021;33(4):237–244.
  • Hall JB, Woods ML, Luechtefeld JT. Paediatric physical therapy telehealth and COVID-19: Factors, facilitators, and barriers influencing Effectiveness - A. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2021;33(3):112–118.
  • MacNeill V, Sanders C, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Experiences of front-line health professionals in the delivery of telehealth: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(624):e401–e407.
  • Button K, Nicholas K, Busse M, et al. Integrating self-management support for knee injuries into routine clinical practice: TRAK intervention design and delivery. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;33:53–60.
  • Lawford BJ, Delany C, Bennell KL, et al. I was really sceptical…but it worked really well: a qualitative study of patient perceptions of telephone-delivered exercise therapy by physiotherapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018;26(6):741–750.
  • Cottrell MA, O'Leary SP, Raymer M, et al. Does tele-rehabilitation result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with in-person care for the management of chronic musculoskeletal spinal conditions in the tertiary hospital setting? A non-randomised pilot clinical trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(7):444–452.
  • Estacio EV, Whittle R, Protheroe J. The digital divide: examining socio-demographic factors associated with health literacy, access and use of internet to seek health information. J Health Psychol. 2019;24(12):1668–1675.
  • Mitchell UA, Chebli PG, Ruggiero L, et al. The digital divide in health-related technology use: the significance of race/ethnicity. The Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):6–14.
  • Hawley-Hague H, Tacconi C, Mellone S, et al. One-to-one and group-based teleconferencing for falls rehabilitation: usability, acceptability, and feasibility study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(1):e19690.
  • Jack K, McLean SM, Moffett JK, et al. Barriers to treatment adherence in physiotherapy outpatient clinics: a systematic review. Man Ther. 2010;15(3):220–228.
  • Bassett SF. The assessment of patient adherence to physiotherapy rehabilitation. N Z J Physiother. 2003;31(2):60–66.
  • Moore AJ, Holden MA, Foster NE, et al. Therapeutic alliance facilitates adherence to physiotherapy-led exercise and physical activity for older adults with knee pain: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Physiother. 2020;66(1):45–53.
  • Mair F, Hiscock J, Beaton S. Understanding factors that inhibit or promote the utilization of telecare in chronic lung disease. Chronic Illn. 2008;4(2):110–117.
  • Cottrell MA, Russell TG. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;48:102193.
  • Kruse C, Karem P, Shifflett K, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(1):4–12.
  • Fisk M, Livingstone A, Pit SW. Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19264.